this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
134 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28100 readers
2055 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Thursday that demands made by Democrats for new restrictions on federal immigration officers are “unrealistic” and warned that the Department of Homeland Security will shut down next week if they do not work with Republicans and the White House.

Democrats say they will not vote for a DHS spending bill when funding runs out unless there are “dramatic changes” at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal law enforcement agencies in the wake of the fatal shootings of two protesters in Minneapolis last month.

The Democratic leaders, Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, released an expanded list of 10 detailed proposals on Wednesday night for restraining Donald Trump’s aggressive campaign of immigration enforcement. Among the demands are a requirement for judicial warrants, better identification of DHS officers, new use of force standards and a stop to racial profiling.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)

They are already caving, Schumer is backtracking the whole masked ICE thing

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Controlled opposition leader — an Epstein class operative — continues to ensure the fascist coup succeeds unopposed.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What's Jill Stein doing? Besides meeting with Putin, obviously.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You mean the .ml dipshit with the hammer & sickle pfp voted for a notorious grifting 3rd party candidate rather than the only candidate that could have defeated Trump and wasn't a fascist like he is?

Color me shocked and shooken /s

Hey, at least they get to virtue signal that they voted against genocide (their lack of meaningful participation objectively aided Trump, and he was/is FAR more genocidal than any Dem).

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait - is this a presidential election year? I thought only came out to check for her shadow every four years…

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

No, it's mid terms this year. I'm just throwing shade at a known Jill Stein voter. Because you're right. She is in her hyperbaric chamber for about another year. A complete joke of a candidate.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 3 points 2 days ago

No masks! Except they can wear them sometimes, as a treat

[–] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So let it. They passed the last funding bill because it also included other departments, this is DHS by itself. Let’s see how many ICE show up for work when they stop getting paid.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I assume many of them do it just so they can legally terrorize people, so they may last longer than you’d think.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Don’t forget the abductions and rape. I’m sure majority of those fuckwards are doing it just for that. Organized chaos, purposeful unaccountability for everything, no records of who is where. Bastards the lot of them.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wasn't there reporting that they're not getting paid anyways?

Bonuses due to labyrinthine rules. If their paychecks stop, it’s a whole different situation.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

JFC keep it shut down, there's no guarantee and no enforcement if DHS ignores those demands. Who is going to arrest them? Pam Bondi sure the hell won't let the FBI touch them.

[–] FatCrab@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

DHS comprises more agencies than just ICE, like FEMA, so that's why I'm assuming they're trying to "compromise." That said, fuck it, DHS has always been an egregious consolidation of power and stain--and FEMA has been made totally useless anyhow.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lol who is fighting to fund DHS at all? Let it just remained unfunded until it dies. Like, what do the Dems lose by just refusing to support anything but 100% of the demands? 2/3 of the population is against ICE right now.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Schumer: No! That other 1/3 is the only part that matters!

/s

[–] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 10 points 2 days ago

"We can't win an election without winning over this 1/3 that literally never votes for us, so we better piss off the other 2/3 that sometimes do"

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Israel and billionaires.

Unironically its Israel and billionaires.

Israel wants a fascist USA because they have total control over the entire GOP, and most establishment Dems, but they've lost popular support from Americans.

Billionaires want a fascist USA because they'll own it. You see what they did in the Epstein Files released thus far? They want to do that to a whole country.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 2 days ago

They shoulda shut that fucking agency down in 2002.

[–] core@leminal.space 4 points 2 days ago

Don't threaten me with a good time.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm looking forward to it for more selfish reasons. Last time I flew they weren't paying any TSA and it was such a pleasant airport experience. I have upcoming flights that I hope benefit similarly.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

TSA is a worthless self-inflicted wound to the country. If I could fly on "I'll Take My Chances" Air, I absolutely would just to reclaim my time from the security theater.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

TSA is nothing but a false sense of security. As someone that used to work for aairline safely and security the true threats to airlines and air travel never come close to crossing paths with TSA

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Honestly, TSA itself creates a huge terror target. If some latter-day Bin Ladin wanted to disrupt the air travel system through acts of mass violence? The airport security lines themselves are a huge target. IIRC there actually have been cases of terrorists attacking airport security lines. If you've ever been to a packed airport on a busy travel day, it should be obvious. Giant TSA line, hundreds of people packed in like cattle. What keeps someone from just wandering up with a bomb in their carry on and detonating it right there in the line? Nothing. And nothing can. You going to make people wait in a security line to get into the security line?

And in terms of actually disrupting the infrastructure of travel, disrupting society, the economy, etc., such attacks have impacts similar to blowing a plane out of the sky. How long is that airport going to be out of commission now that the mandated security line is now a mass crime scene?

Anyway, these are the darker thoughts I think in the back of my mind when stuck in an endless TSA line...

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Democrats: Task failed successfully.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They are trying to push the save act. It's basically a law to take away women's right to vote. I kid you not.

They say it's to make it so only u.s citizens can vote. But it states that name must match birth certificate. No exceptions.

Who often changes their name in our culture ?

It also takes voting away from people who became citizens but weren't born here.

Who doesn't have a u.a birth certificate?