this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
84 points (94.7% liked)

politics

27968 readers
4078 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Unsurprisingly, there has been little indication the American progressive left perceives Newsom as deserving anything but disdain. Recent weeks have only bolstered the sense that committing to the abolition of ICE is a prerequisite for any remotely moral candidate in 2028. If Newsom fails to become that candidate, it will not be because he appeared too left-wing, but because he lacked the guts or the inclination to be anything except what he manifestly is: a preening political operator, beholden to a status quo that no longer exists.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Newsom would keep ice and the patriot act in place and wouldn't even fix the cost of living

[–] karashta@sopuli.xyz 30 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

He's a hollow bell that tolls for money

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. When the rubber meets the profits Newsom will always side with capital. It's he better than trump? Yes. But is he the man to fix our nation. Absolutely not.

[–] karashta@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 hours ago
[–] halfsalesman@piefed.social 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, Newsom would be an extremely depressing dystopian candidate. I want Ro Khanna or AOC. Or either one as president and vice president.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Ro Khanna is just lighting things up this year. Very pleased with everything he's been doing

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

He doesn't have a chance, because it's going to be a fair primary all the way thru.

They might be able to buy the first couple states especially if they start early, but they can't keep up the whole cycle which is why prior DNCs always tried to call it like 2 weeks after the first states vote.

2028 will run until ever state votes, and the DNC isn't going to favor anyone.

So the only chance Newsom has, is depressing turnout for the primary.

Which is why so many people keep acting like the DNC hasn't changed, they've already fell for the propaganda and are spreading it.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 10 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

why do you think the primarys will be fair this time and that the DNC won't favour a corporate Democrat? There's been no evidence or prior indications that this will be the case this time that I have seen.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

why do you think the primarys will be fair this time and that the DNC won’t favour a corporate Democrat

Because the chair is all powerful and accountable to no one...

And the new one led Minnesota for like a decade and ran fair primaries turning a purple state progressive without any bias.

It's been a year, and they've been sending record breaking levels of funding back to state parties, that's why we keep "over performing" in special elections.

What's important here, is that this funding was a cudgel wielded by prior neoliberals: do what we saw or we'll bankrupt your whole state.

That threat is literally gone.

Had you not "seen" any of that on billionaire owned media?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

To them the dnc doing what they do to tip the scales in the open rather than completely behind the scenes is proof they won't...

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's crazy to me honestly.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Especially with all the shenanigans that have happened since the new chair took over to fuck over progressives. But sure totally will be different this time

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

The DNC will back whoever THEY want as their candidate and they will do everything on their power to make sure everyone else falls in line. And they will use the same tropes they've always used about 'most important election of our lifetime™' and every liberal voter will fall on line