this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
112 points (99.1% liked)

Games

45797 readers
1073 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 59 minutes ago

Ya know... if they had spent a single second on the story instead and maybe made a cohesive plot that followed anywhere close to the first instead of phoning in the bullshit they did...it might have been a bit more well received.

[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised. I was going into the final stretch of Outer Worlds 1 and realized I just don't care. It wasn't a bad game but New Vegas it was not.

[–] trebor8201@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Right. An hour after maxing out my character I realized I wasn't really having fun anymore, I was just trying to get it over with.

[–] whitecollarcry@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Saw it came out and thought for a second "I want to play that" but in reality there was nothing redeeming from the first to bring me back

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

i finished the first one but couldn't even push past 2 hours on the second. Just awful

[–] SmokyOrange@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Thats where I'm at. I'm just now wrapping up Outer Worlds 1 and its just not that good or memorable.

I think it was good, but not memorable. It was... Fine. It was a fun romp, I don't feel like I wasted it, but I don't think there needs to be a huge franchise either.

I'm all for fine games. Not everything needs to be red dead levels and they did that with outer worlds. That said, I was shocked when Microsoft wanted 80 bucks for it when the first one was clearly a 40 dollar game

[–] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Outer worlds 1 was fine. It was goofy, had character, but no depth to it's story. The gunplay was not good, not for me anyway. Can we not do bullet sponges and leveled lists? Can levels give you abilities instead of numbers? Honestly would have been a better game if it was an isometric RPG, which obsidian is good at making.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

Was. But I do agree.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

$70 for a game is mad. Even if it was critically acclaimed and award winning who can afford that when most people struggle to live? Even $50 is a lot of money. Big game developers have lost the plot.

AAA games are just too expensive and many are just not finished at release now. I'm not forking out top dollar for a half finished game. Outer Worlds 2 is still $89.99 CAD. That is absolutely insane in my opinion. I enjoyed the first one, but I also bought it on sale. Indy games nowadays are generally a better bang for your buck anyways and theyre only $30-40 regular price and they are also generally at a finished state or at the very least very honest about the state they are in.

I'll probably pick the game up in 2 years when its $20 on Steam or something.

[–] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

This will be the new normal for a couple years. Then when no one in the US can afford a $30 game. They'll set the prices back for $60.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I mean I play the games either way.

So whether companies learn to make their games affordable for the vast majority of Americans who are cash strapped or not is irrelevant to me.

I'm just wondering how long it takes these companies to realize how many others like me there are out there and that they could be making a lot more money if they just made prices reasonable.

I actualy finally have a decent income and I still do what I do if the price isn't fair, just out of spite.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

This for me too. It is too high a ticket price for a game I want to play but am not completely excited about. My hardware will possibly also struggle with this title, so that was too high of a barrier for me.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Awe fuck. Loved 2. What a shame :(

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How did you like 2 vs the first? Haven't beat the first got it for free with my prime subscription and just got to monarch. So far liking it!

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Felt very polished and the dialogue tress are massive.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

I didn't realise it came out already. Whoops.

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

I mean, there's no great secret, right ? The Outer Worlds is just an alright-ish franchise. Bethesda without the incompetence, but also without the hype.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

and without the fun

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

I don't often see people making the mistake that way around. I mostly saw people not realising that the outer wilds was a different game to the outer worlds.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The Outer Wilds

That's the wrong game

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

And just to be clear, The Outer Wilds is way more than just alright.

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah sorry, very easy to confuse ! Outer Wilds is one of the defining masterpieces of gaming, Outer Worlds is just alright.

[–] Kjell@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I liked the first Outer Worlds but didn't even look towards Outer Worlds 2 because it was other better or more interesting games that was released last year.

It feels like it was to much to release Avowed, Outer Worlds 2 and Grounded 2 in the same year. They should have spread out the games more to polish them more before the release.

[–] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 27 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

God man, shits so sad but I'd be lying if I said I was surprised at all. The first one was very OK, like it was certainly a game that I played and bothered completing. They were very lucky someone had the idea to make Parvati in the first game, the rest of the crew was a snooze fest (at least for me). But then I see the shitty commercial they made for the companions in the 2nd game, and no fucking wonder it didn't sell! They tell you nothing, play that god awful song over some shitty footage and crack a joke about how none of them are romance-able. They then charge 80 bucks, and make fun of you if you pay for their premium edition, yea go fuck yourself obsidian, and stop taking credit for new Vegas, none of those team members are still around.

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 hours ago

Might just be me but.... I really like the companions in the Outer Worlds 2. They're way better than the first game. The inability to romance them was actually a selling point to me, because I assumed that meant each character's arc would focus on their own story unrelated to their relationship with the player, like in New Vegas.

So far, I've loved how Inez especially expands on the history of Auntie's Choice. There's one companion that's just a little goofy, but I also don't know how you'd do that character without making them extremely naive.

The game as a whole actually is much more fleshed-out than the first, at least thus far (halfway through). I highly recommend getting it on a sale.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

This is an accurate take haha.

[–] Zaraki42@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

Don't apologize for enjoying a game.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Honestly, the first one was Ok, I'm kinda surprised there was a second one.

Ok, not really surprised since every IP needs to be a franchise, but you know what I mean.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 hours ago

Your extremely expensive try-hard sequel to a just OK game didn't blow everyone away? Womp womp. Obsidian died when MS bought them.

[–] commander@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Outer Worlds 2, Avowed, Mass Effect Andromeda, Dragon Age Veilguard - each one of these games were touted for their improved combat, at least improved movement. That's not to say any are great, just that they're not as clunky as previous games. They are not standout in that regard. So for Bioware and Obsidian, it is still the case that their draw is writing in a higher budget RPG than the startup indie scene. Pretty much where Owlcat is now getting to with Warhammer and the Expanse licensed games, that's where Bioware and Obsidian were 20-25 years ago. Narrative games

Bioware and Obsidian games aren't so fun to play to appeal with mediocre writing. I think like an 80+% reduction of irony, snark, sarcasm, eye rolls, modern slang, knods to modern culture would do wonders for their games writing. Don't have to get rid of all of it. Just have them be more fun finds in a dialog tree that make them memorable and each high quality while the rest of the narrative takes itself seriously. I'll 5 great jokes over 100, "ehh I get it. I guess that's funny."

[–] Devmapall@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I couldn't get into veil guard. The combat was pretty good and it looks pretty. The characters were annoying and seemed... Type cast? All their dialogue seemed corny. Maybe they get better throughout the story but the story also didn't grab me.

I played all the others and the mass effect series multiple times. I even enjoyed Andromeda for what it was (though I quit at the final mission save for some reason).

[–] commander@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

My guess on Veilguard is that after the original creator left, now it was up to remaining writers to maintain passion in lore that they didn't formulate. So Veilguard, it all gets watered down and anticlimactically rolled out and the focus ended up being relationship drama which still sucked. A Dragon Age game that wants to be Lifetime channel medieval teenage fantasy romance but the characters are all seasoned combat veteran adults so it's very weird for them to behaving so childish and unprofessional or even blase about the world ending/faith shattering reveals in the story

I played DA1-3 a bunch of times. Veilguard just sucks. ME1-3 I never liked like KOTOR 1and 2 but good enough. Andromeda, it's not interesting. Dropped maybe halfway through. Good gunplay and movement but overly big uninteresting worlds. I don't remember what any character wanted. At least Inquisition, the different areas were visually memorable

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not shocked. this seems like, at best, it might be a $10 steam pickup... Same as the first game

load more comments (1 replies)

I kept getting mixed up with Outer Worlds and Outer Wilds, and got really excited then disappointed when I heard about Outer Worlds 2, thinking that Outer Wilds was getting a sequel. So it was always a bummer to me even without actually playing the game.

[–] CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

The first one was mostly terrible and coasted on, 'not Bethesda ' and fallout vibes. But it was shallow and janky.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I remember getting it because the hype around it being better at RPG storytelling than Fallout 4 which was still new was the number one thing I heard about it.

While it is better written, I'll give it that, it very much suffers from the same lack of interesting choices that Fallout 4 has. You have rebel, capitalist, and maybe sometimes a neutral 3rd option. Having two of those three choices just make one side happy and the other mad at you isn't exactly the kind of depth I was hoping for.

And the action is pretty mid at best, while Fallout 4 I have pretty much always thought of as a pretty damn good looter shooter where it fails at being a halfway decent RPG.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 56 points 17 hours ago (9 children)

It underperformed due to them overcharging for it.

I had my sights set on buying it shortly after launch, then they decided to charge €80 for it on launch, and still charge €70 for it.

I would be fine with €60, but more is just greedy.

And yes I noticed way too late that they had it on sale for €50 this december, and I missed that opportunity due to other expenses.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 31 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's a great game imho, but I was gifted my copy - in no world is a game worth €80, it's completely divorced from reality. Fucking tragic the publisher just killed it on delivery.

load more comments (1 replies)

I basically refuse to pay more than $50 for a game.

The outer wilds had some good press but by the time I was interested it was given away for free. Guessing that’ll be the case here too.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TalkingFlower@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

For some reason, I just felt the humour was trying too hard, plus the price tag made the overall package unappealing to me.

[–] Yarny@lemmy.ml 18 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Didn't mind the first one, but you are out of your mind if you think I would pay $70 for this game. Especially after they tried to sell it for $80 at first. Thank god that didn't fly. Fuck you Microsoft.

It's crazy too, because most games that launch for $70, you can just wait 3 months and then they'll have a 30% sale. I will be picking it up this March, should go on sale for like 40%.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No way in hell I’d pay its nearly $100CAD asking price.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›