this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
111 points (98.3% liked)

News

36994 readers
2070 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This week, Drop Site News revealed a draft resolution from Trump’s newly christened “Board of Peace.” The resolution outlines what is, in essence, Phase Two of Trump’s unrealistic peace plan that ushered in a new phase of horror in Gaza under the guise of a ceasefire.

The actions outlined in the resolution ignore realities on the ground and paint a very grim picture of what the United States is planning for Gaza. Far from abandoning the ludicrous and offensive imagery Trump shared in that AI video from last year of himself and Elon Musk on a beach in an unrecognizable Gaza, this resolution is the battle plan to turn Gaza into the playground for the wealthy that Jared Kushner presented to the World Economic Forum at Davos last week.

It’s a Gaza where the only Palestinians remaining are those chosen to be the servants in the new regime.

It’s a Gaza under permanent American occupation.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Oil drives our Israel policy: New government documents reveal a very different history of America and the Middle East

Excerpted from "Dying to Forget: Oil, Power, Palestine, and the Foundations of U.S. Policy in the Middle East":

The record of U.S. policy from 1945 to 1949 challenges fundamental assumptions about U.S. understanding and involvement in the struggle over Palestine that continue to dominate mainstream interpretations of U.S. policy in the Middle East. Coming to grips with the U.S. record and its frequently mythified depiction of the struggle over Palestine is criti­cal. Those engaged in the creation of the Common Archive, a project of Zochrot, the Israeli NGO, in which Israelis and Palestinians have joined to reconstruct the history of Palestinian villages destroyed by Israel in 1948, clearly understand the importance of this record. Palestinian historians have long written about this history, and Israel’s “New His­torians” have confirmed it in their challenge to the dominant Israeli narrative of the war of 1948.

The Middle East in 2014 is not a mirror image of what it was in 1948, when the struggle over Palestine was at its height. "In the imme­diate postwar years, the United States defined its policy in the Near and Middle East in terms of assuring unimpeded access and control by U.S. oil companies of its great material prize, petroleum.

It almost seems like if the history that's usually just glossed over (if it's mentioned at all in the U.S.) included the reality of the history behind most U.S. foreign policy since WWII, there would be way less support for propaganda that somehow always justifies the invasion of other countries, and coincidentally works out to make the wealthiest people at the top even more wealthy. Always at the expense of freedom and liberty for the little people below who made the mistake of existing on top of the oil (or whatever natural resources happen to be the oil of the future) those at the top wanted to exploit.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remember when they found new fossil fuel reserves off the coast of Gaza? Trump does.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Fuck, I didn't even know about that, but definitely on point for these evil assholes. Exploit, exploit, exploit, if anybody gets in your way or calls you out on what you're doing, then they're the terrorist.

Recognised Palestinian state could develop disputed gas resources, expert says

Michael Barron, the author of a new book on Palestine’s untapped gas reserves, has suggested the field could generate $4bn (£3bn) in revenue at current prices and it is reasonable that the PA could receive $100m a year over 15 years.

He said the revenues “would not turn the Palestinians into the next Qataris or Singaporeans, but it would be their own revenue and not aid, on which the Palestinian economy remains dependent”.

Fucking ridiculous how these bullshit narrative control strategies meant to justify what they're doing and get the public on their side are so similar no matter where in the globe there are resources or people to exploit.

"Are you still complaining about us exploiting you? Look could things have been done differently? Who's to say? Pobody's nerfect, but you have to move on. Stop living in the past and being so reliant on everyone else. Focus on the future and pull yourself up by your bootstraps! .... Oh shit, where did you get those bootstraps? Gimme, gimme, gimme!"

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Now go look up when they found new fossil fuel reserves off the coast of Ukraine.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

? thats still a correct statement.

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Joe Biden would have never supported a genocied.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

..he absolutely did, as a matter of public record. Orangeboi just happens to be even worse. Which is all anyone was trying to say with regard to Harris.

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why, did Orangeboi send more money and munitions than Biden or something?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nice, I'll add that to the list. Being anti-genocide makes you

  1. Antisemitic

  2. A tankie

(not sure you guys know what either of those mean anymore tbh the way you apply it to everything lol)

No I’m just calling you out for being reductively myopic for thinking it would have been less possible to publicly pressure Harris into changing her policy vis a vis Israel than orangeboi. Because shining you can publicly pressure orangeboi into anything if you’re not bribing the absolute fuck out of him is the height of idiocy. I hate that Harris was the candidate too, but there was a hope of actually forcing her to change. There is zero chance of that happening with the current regime.

And for the record, I absolutely agree that Biden was an absolute travesty for myriad reasons, and it’s a travesty that he was anointed as the DNC candidate in 2020 - but he was still better than orangeboi in pretty much all respects.