this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
316 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

79985 readers
4703 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bgb_ca@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

And work bosses saw a news story on this and banned the app outright :( can anyone suggest a replacement that is not paid and has features useful for searching lots of large logs files quickly for keywords?

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Rename the shortcut to notepad++2?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 28 minutes ago

I guess Geany could work?

[–] kablez@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago

Zed! Fastest GUI editor out there other than Sublime Text.

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 29 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

China, Russia, the US, fucking Israel. They all piss me off so fucking much. Can't we live in a sane world just for a single fucking day?

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 71 points 1 day ago

Oof. Kudos to Notepad++ for being up front with the details.

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 9 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I would like to know starting from wich version should i be concerned. I haven't updated in a while i think.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The timeline says the attack started in June of 2025 and continued through Dec 2, 2025. If you installed, updated, or silently updated during that period you may have been targeted / compromised.

[–] Snazz@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What was the latest version before June 2025?

[–] pez@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like 8.8.1 was May 2025 https://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/v881-we-are-with-ukraine/

8.8.2 was June 2025 and has a warning to ignore "false positives" of malware in the update.... Ouch. https://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/8.8.2-available-in-1-week-without-certificate/

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

You might have version 8.8.1 or lower, however it might have tried to order update got the vulnerable package instead and then remained on the older version. I think even if you have the older version that's not a sign that you weren't compromised.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 4 points 18 hours ago

Every version before the previous one.

If you haven't updated you were not vulnerable to the update hijacking.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 27 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Yikes... i guess i am confused though. What data was being sent through this channel? What did they get from people while it happened and why did it take 2 months past them stopping it to finally make a release? I love the app, but this sounds really bad.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 12 points 18 hours ago

The previous release already fixed this, or evaded the issue.

The channel was the update mechanism. Upon Notepad++ checking for updates, they were able to inject their own. So if you updated via the apps own update checker they could have misdirected you into installing something else or something modified.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 50 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

From my understanding: Basically the attackers could reply to your version check request (usually done automatically) and tell N++ that there were a new version available. If you then approved the update dialogue, N++ would download and execute the binary from the update link that the server sent you. But this didn't necessarily need to be a real update, it could have been any binary since neither the answer to the update check nor the download link were verified by N++

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Thats what i was thinking, but there is no mention on if this did happen and if it did what did was compromised or allowed to happen.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Expanding on this: the exploit was against their domain name, redirecting selected update requests away from the notepad++ servers. The software itself didn't validate that the domain actually points to notepad++ servers, and the notepad++ update servers would not see any information that would tell them what was happening.

Likely they picked some specific developers with a known public IP, and only used this to inject those specific people with malware.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 7 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

So the solution would have been an SSL certificate check on the client side.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 3 points 16 hours ago

That's what they say they rolled out, after: "Within Notepad++ itself, WinGup (the updater) was enhanced in v8.8.9 to verify both the certificate and the signature of the downloaded installer"

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Can't tell if that would have helped

which could have allowed the malicious actors to redirect some of the traffic going to https://notepad-plus-plus.org/getDownloadUrl.php to their own servers

They could have just piped the binaries though the same server since they had this level of access. They would have had months to figure it out.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oof, I thought it was just a DNS hijack. If they had access to the server, it's game over regardless.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's not game over regardless if the updater checks a signature of the update installer. Them it wouldn't run an installer by someone else.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's true, assuming they didn't also put their private keys on the server

[–] elvith@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago

As the hoster wrote this:

we immediately transferred all clients’ web hosting subscriptions from this server

It looks like the binaries and the update check script were put on a simple web space. If that is the correct conclusion to draw from this excerpt, then it'd be rather strange to have the keys on that server as it's very unlikely that it was used to produce any builds.

[–] MolochHorridus@lemmy.ml 15 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

So should we at least uninstall our current Notepad++ and then download a new version? What else should we do, the post really doesn’t offer any advice.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 23 hours ago

In the old post from when the update was released a Heise article is linked, that contains indicators of compromise, and in turn links to Kevin Beaumont for the details of his analysis:

https://lemmy.zip/post/54712916
https://www.heise.de/en/news/Notepad-updater-installed-malware-11109726.html
https://doublepulsar.com/small-numbers-of-notepad-users-reporting-security-woes-371d7a3fd2d9

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yes, that's the safe way. Uninstall, download current version, install. That's it.

Outside of being compromised already where you would have to notice and fix outside of notepad anyway. But that seems unlikely given the selective attack nature the hoster was able to confirm. If you'd want to cover that you would have to know and do a lot more.

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think you'll need to uninstall. If I'm reading the article correctly, it looks like they plugged the hole in their update process by switching hosting providers to one that's even more hardened and secure. So requests from the updater should go to the correct place now and not the state-sponsored hacker.

Then in about a month, the next version of notepad++ that is released will also properly validate/verify any downloaded update files from the server.

You could also just disable the checks for updates from within the application too. Or better yet, use something like winget to handle the updates instead of the built-in updater.

[–] AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago

The article literally states that should you download the latest version from their site directly and then use the installer to update manually. Who knows if those who were effected already could have something else compromising the update/install process. I wouldnt update from the built in updater until the new fix with certificate and signature verification is released.

[–] AlfredoJohn@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago

I would just follow their advice, download the newest version from their site directly and use the new versions installer to update manually. I would probably do the same thing when the newest version with certificate and signature verification releases, after that I would assume you should be good to go. However its probably also worth scanning your system for malware just incase you updated during the time frame the attack was live.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

So that’s what the second plus includes….

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

So what malware got shipped?

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

There were a lot of typos in the linked announcement.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›