this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
424 points (99.5% liked)

World News

52934 readers
2261 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Norway’s crown princess has become embroiled in another scandal after newly unsealed files appeared to show her years of extensive contact with the late child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The latest tranche of Epstein files, released on Friday by the US justice department, appear to include nearly 1,000 mentions of the crown princess, Mette-Marit.

The files include scores of emails traded between the two, suggesting they were in contact from 2011 to 2014, the Norwegian daily VG reported. Mette-Marit married the future king of Norway in 2001.

The revelations come at a sensitive time for the royal family. The trial of Mette-Marit’s son, Marius Borg Høiby for rape is due to begin on Tuesday. He was born from a relationship before she married Crown Prince Haakon

Høiby is facing 38 charges, including the alleged rape of four women as well as alleged assault and drug offences. If convicted he could face up to 16 years in prison. Høiby has denied the most serious charges, including those of sexual abuse.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 7 hours ago

Good thing my queen is a decent women with nice, well educated kids. I has to suck to have parasites like this live at your expense.

[–] kalistia@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 hours ago
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 14 hours ago

all the NONCE kings and princes had ties with epsteins MS kung fu master.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 156 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The movement to get rid of the parasitic monarchy in Norway got a lot of traction this week, so that is nice.

There is an actual hearing in Parliament this tuesday about abolishing the monarchy. Not caused by this but happily strengthened.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 20 hours ago

You can bet that once the inevitable population-wide vote happens on whether to keep the monarchy, I will vote no. I already didn't like having a monarchy from before, now doubly so.

[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (16 children)

I've traditionally been a supporter of keeping the monarchy for its diplomatic functions and (mostly) unifying force among people, but this does feel like a sea-change. Maybe opinions in Norway are more forgiving, I don't know--I moved away many years ago. In my opinion, it's probably time to re-evaluate whether we (Norway) want to keep this going. It was decided decades ago to keep it at least until the current Crown Prince had his turn, but now that's looking like a bad idea. They need to do something, and hopefully they can still wind it down with some dignity. Maybe it's possible to make a nice, clean break when King Harald passes on. Either way, it should be up to the People.

I'm not 100% convinced having a President will be better, seeing as some Presidents like to act as if they're kings. But with all the scandals, I think if anyone still believes monarchs are immune to political influence, they should wake up now.

PS: I was wondering if you have some more information about the hearing (e.g. news article). I can't find it in the Norwegian media. (I read/speak Norwegian).

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You can have a President without having a Presidential system - like, for example, Germany - were that post is mainly being a figurehead/top-diplomat with mainly the power of shaming parliament when they go overboard with some laws, both not actually able to block it, possible with some limited power to dissolve parliament and call new elections.

Basically it's the same thing as a modern day monarch in a Democratic nation, except that people actually get to chose who gets the post, if they turn out to be bad at it they get replaced after 4 years rather than being there for life and they don't actually own a massive chunk of wealth for historical reasons (like, for example, the British Royal Family).

I've lived under Presidential systems (Portugal) and Constitutional Monarchies (The Netherlands, Britain) and vastly prefer the former: the latter is especially fucked up in Britain were the Royals actually have real power (to block laws) - if seldom used - and are the cornerstone of a well entrenched system of patronage and class segregation which is far beyond anything I've seen elsewhere in Europe, though granted in The Netherlands The Royals were a lot closer to normal people - to the point that before becoming King the current ruler used to work as a pilot for KLM - than in Britain.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Portugal doesn't have a Presidential system, it's a Semi-Presidential one.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

You're correct, similarly to Germany it has a President with limited powers which are far less than Parliament or the Govern, not a Presidential System (like the US or France) were the President actually has executive power.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, power corrupts. But royalty is excempt from scrutiny way too much. The king keeps pardoning finance crime buddies and it's not even mentioned in the media like other corruption would be.

Anyway, regjeringen.no has info on the hearings :)

[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you, I found it here. I'm a little bit surprised it's not in the media more.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 17 hours ago

Pretty sure because it's a routine tradition, and is always expected to end in the favor of keeping the monarchy. So it's not really too interesting unless you are a politician

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

I guess ‘No Kings’ is doing something after all

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml 28 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

He was first sentenced in 2008..

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Looks bad until you realise how afraid of confrontations Norwegians are

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like the apple didn't fall far from the tree.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

A lifetime of living without consequence where your every whim is met creates dangerously broken people

[–] mudstickmcgee@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

What happened here is actually worse somehow. Mette marit was a "commoner" known on her circles as a fun party/rave girl. The usual drugs included. She had a son (Marius) with someone from that walk of life. He had the chance to turn 8 or 9 i think before having the title of "royalty" thrust uppon him at the same time his single mother got swept away on all sorts of royal adventures.

Not hard at all to see how that can fuck you up royally.

Edit: just remembered she had a sextape from the good old days, and since it was only of interest to us Norwegians and the internett wasn't as big as it is now they've managed to scrub it. Or that might just have been rumors, but I'm like 80% sure i saw it at one of the early 2000's LAN parties.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 81 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I was told that royal families are all ceremonial and that they don't have any real power, but we keep finding them embroiled with people who have real power.

Really makes you think.

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Money==power. Monarchs roll in money.

[–] motogo@feddit.dk 1 points 7 hours ago

No times 2. Monarchs don't really roll in money, and to elaborate let's dive into your first statement, and why it's off. Money is only really power if you have the freedom to buy with it as you want. Monarchs have very little freedom of any in that regard. Often you'll find that the vast majority of the so-called appanage comes with a note of exactly what they should pay for. Like, paying for renovations of buildings you don't appreciate living in and stills being told to live in it. Agreed, they do live a rather decent lifestyle, and there's no reason to feel sorry for monarchs' financial setup, but it comes at a hefty price of a lifetime commitment to no freedom in some regards. Personally I really appreciate the royal family in Denmark. The Danish king is a wise, highly trained military man, who also is a father driving his kids to school in a flatbed bicycle. It's just good PR for a country to have a king (and queen) like that.

[–] cuboc@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

In theory, yes. In our country, our royal family has an undisclosed amount of money, get an undisclosed amount of money from the taxpayer and has a number of other sources of income as well. One of the nephews of the king has a huge real estate business built upon his family money.

Fucking parasites.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Any social influencers of this level obviously have indirect power and anyone who claims otherwise is delusional.

That being said, I do think it's possible that ceremonial representation can be beneficial. I'd love states start electing purely ceremonial roles more as it's a really powerful social tool for uniting people and can be done right.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Honestly the idea of just using a mascot that you just hire someone to play isn't the worst idea. Just like, someone playing Marianne or whatever that lady that represents France in political cartoons is named.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›