this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
292 points (99.7% liked)

politics

27719 readers
2238 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats scored a stunning upset on Saturday in a special election runoff for Texas Senate, according to a projection from Decision Desk HQ, giving the party a major boost ahead of the November midterms.

The district favored President Trump — who endorsed Wambsganss earlier on Saturday — by 17 points in 2024. The race went to a runoff after none of the candidates were able to clinch a majority in the November election.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Texas has runoffs? How the fuck did that ever get passed there.

[–] DarkGamer@fedia.io 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

A blue Texas would put our long national nightmare to an end.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

A blue Texas would put our long national nightmare to an end

Not on its own, but it certainly would be a huge step in the right direction.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

A reminder that you can and should celebrate the win but for fucks sake remember that Doug Jones is the norm and treat this situation as such.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 117 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Trump by 17% to a Democrat by 14.4%, a 31.4% swing. The party of ICE and the child rapist is in big trouble if we have a free and fair election in 9 months.

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 75 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

IF we have a FAIR AND FREE election!!

should be a given in this day and age. but yet I'm questioning it...

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 35 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

These guys are doing absolutely everything they can to ensure it's not free and fair.

It's a question of how un-free and how un-fair.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

Even if the nazis fail to rig the midterms, the Epstein class have already pre-positioned corrupt neoliberals who will not imprison/execute the tens of thousands of nazis necessary to prevent the total collapse of the United States.

If most nazis do not face real justice, they'll just continue to rot the country from the inside until the nazi-owned mainstream media erodes public sanity enough for the fascist coup to succeed in 5-10 years.

I'm talking a scorched earth, extrajudicial response, if necessary; every ICE agent currently employed, everyone in the military who committed war crimes bombing Venezuelan fishing boats and engaging in piracy, all of the architects behind project 2025 — including the entire heritage foundation and everyone even remotely associated, who should be classified as domestic terrorism orgs on day 1 — hundreds of CEO's, oligarchs, and lobbyists who have bribed and corrupted politicians in broad daylight for all to see... Basically every Republican appointed by, or whom has supported, Trump in the judiciary, legislative, and especially his entire executive regime, at ANY point since 2015. All pardons immediately rescinded. Fuck precedent! Every Jan 6th attendee should spend a decade in federal prison (I'm sure half of them would already be imprisoned for life or executed due to terrorism under Trumps paramilitary ICE). Fox News, Oann, Newsmax should also be classified as domestic terrorist orgs, completely dissolved, with most senior leadership spending the rest of their lives in federal prison.

I have no faith whatsoever that the Democrats have the virtue, honor, or conviction to do what's necessary to eliminate fascism with the extreme prejudice it requires.

If the above concerns you, then you wouldn't have supported what was necessary to neutralize nazi Germany before they murdered 60-80 million people, either.

[–] French75@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

I'd say the fascist coup is well,underway. Also, a meaningful opposition response (let alone scorched earth) requires an organized opposition. We're pretty far from that existing, and you're right, it absolutely won't come from within the ranks of Democrats.

The formation of an opposition will be dramatically more challenging too because of the pervasiveness of the surveillance-capitalism apparatus that's fueling ICE's campaign. A key step toward a meaningful resistance would be punishing the companies that comprise the surveilance capitalism regime, but most of the people who would like this regime to go away don't have the will to stop using TikTok, Feacebook, X, and Insta.

[–] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 13 hours ago

The sad truth is that not prosecuting/imprisoning/executing tens of thousands of Nazis is what got the USA into this very evident and stunning collapse. Compromise with evil begets evil.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 9 points 15 hours ago

I agree that the Dems don't have what it would take.

They're your best chance at a not-Trump administration, but they're not going to wind back the encroachment of fascism.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 8 points 13 hours ago

With this outlook Trump will (have to) do everything in his power that they won't be.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io -5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

There will be no midterms.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Who do you think this comment helps?

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

I can assure you that you are mistaken.

Despair asserts omniscience, and I've had enough of both despair and assertion of omniscience.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 69 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

The seat opened up after Republican state Sen. Kelly Hancock was tapped as acting state comptroller.

So, the Republicans felt comfortable enough in this district to intentionally trigger this election. They could have appointed someone from another district or someone who wasn't holding a seat at all, but they thought they were safe. I think that shows just how badly they are underestimating the level of outrage right now.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 10 points 7 hours ago

Gerrymandering backfires when taken too far.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is also basically why the dems lost in 2016 and 2024. Complacency and bystander effect. Nobody could be dumb enough to vote trump and certainly not twice. Only they did.

[–] lofuw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Dems lost in 2016 because they chose to run Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders.

Dems lost in 2024 because they chose to run a black female over someone who actually cared about the working class.

The democrat constituency isn't as stupid as the democrat party would like to believe. We recognize how the people in power think we'll vote for someone just because their a minority, regardless of what their economic policy actually is.

Democrats would run the country if there wasn't a sizeable amount of voters only prioritizing candidates that won't raise their taxes or the taxes of people richer than them.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You're circling the point without really identifying it. Dems lost in '16 and '24 because they did not hold primaries and just hoped that there were enough people opposed to Trump that they'd vote for whoever they chose.

On the other hand, in what might be the only credit you can give him, Trump faced three primaries in the Republican party and won them not by the party leaders pre-selecting him, but by actually being more popular with voters than the other guys.

[–] French75@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 hours ago

Dems lost in '16 and '24 because they did not hold primaries and just hoped that there were enough people opposed to Trump

2020, yes, but 2016 wasn't about Trump. The Dem establishment had already decided "it's her turn" well before Trump even won being taken seriously, and before his first primary win in NH. The Democratic Party eliminated the democratic process from its primaries and is baffled why people are mad at that.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

With current ICE invasions they may even flip florida blue again

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 23 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

But certainly a refreshing change.