Slop.

Is bro telling on himself?

This is like a half-formed thought. They can observe that the people on Epstein's plane had access to power and "tankies" don't have access to power, and then the thought just stops before they make the connection between the two.

You can prove anything I guess if you just make shit up. Tankies destroyed

If you met with Epstein but you were completely honest about it when questioned and nothing comes out of the files contradicting it, I’ll believe you. He certainly had meetings with non-pedophiles sometimes.

However, if it turns out you lied about a single detail of your relationship with Epstein, as far as I’m concerned that’s enough evidence to put you in prison for child sexual assault. There is no other reason to lie about your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein than trying to hide your crimes. Put everyone he’s ever sent an email to on trial, and put anyone found to have lied about it in prison forever.

Noam Chomsky is a pedophile and a child predator. Any mention of him should be “Notorious pedophile Noam Chomsky”

"If true, one wonders why, in country after country, these Reds side with the poor and powerless often at great risk and sacrifice to themselves, rather than reaping the rewards that come with serving the well-placed like nudes of underage girls at Epstein's pedo island." - Parenti paraphrased

Given more access to power...as if power isn't actively bargained for by these liberals. Nope they just gave Chomsky the pedophile wealth power like a fucking Green Lantern ring. The fucker just got done talking about how it's all about reciprocity. Can't even be consistent in their own narrative.

Also why weren't tankies given more power in this arrangement? Maybe there is a clue. Because tankies don't seek power by cuddling up to billionaire pedophiles nor enter into reciprocal exchanges of favors with them.

Has anyone ever told bro that most 'tankies' live in the Global South?

The best thing about "tankies" right now is there really isn't a singular marxist-leninist figurehead. Let's say, I don't know, Richard wolff was in the files? Our entire ideology isn't tied to one old white dude so it wouldn't matter much.

I mean, I guess you probably would? Epstein was explicitly targeting people with wealth and power to bring into his gross "parties", so if you had "tankies" with wealth and power, he'd have been targeting them and it's not unbelievable that some of them might have gone for it - if you gain the kind of wealth and power the people Epstein was courting have, you probably don't have any real moral principles.

I wonder why tankies never seem to have that wealth and power. Could it be that in order to become the kind of wealthy socialite Epstein was doing, you would have to abandon your communist principles entirely? No, it's the children that are wrong...

FFS, Epstein was getting around with world leaders of every continent. He was pictured with Castro one or two times yet no evidence exists that Castro even did as much as shake Epstein's hands since Epstein was only there for other people. He was doing deals in Mongolia.

Isn't it notable that in all of that he never entrapped anyone from a communist country? It's likely he was operating as an intelligence asset and it's obvious how useful it would be to have compromat on leaders of enemy states, or even left wing intellectuals like Chomsky and Parenti. But it appears that no one you could consider a "tankie" was implicated.

I don't even get what their argument is, tankies didn't fuck around with Epstein cuz they're white... so they don't need Epstein's influence? I legit don't get the argument.

Let me whip out some IdPol.