this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
297 points (99.7% liked)

politics

27493 readers
2934 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This post uses a gift link which makes access free, but you may need to register. I have not copy-pasted the URL into archive.is because Hearst has lawyers who don't like that.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 minutes ago

Ban them from breathing air.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I’m gonna have a moral dilemma at some point where we are putting former ice agents in concentration camps as they await trial and their death sentences. Imma feel a little bad about that. Oh well

[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 5 points 2 hours ago

Lol they're too dumb to be either

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

That's it? Can't we just exile them from ever returning to Cali?

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 25 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If you become a bootlicker be ok with not being allowed to participate in public service.

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Public service is specifically engineered to encourage bootlickers and weed out independent thinking.

I was an employee of the department of homeland security for about 6 months back in 2023, and I was fired for invoking my Weingarten rights as a union member.

This is very specifically against the law on local and federal levels.

I told my union rep (AFGE local 1533) that my rights had been violated repeatedly. My rep told me "arbitrations are expensive" and that the union "will not pursue your grievances".

I wish an eye opening lose-your-income-and-housing on each and every person working for AFGE in any capacity.

Fuck them once for not having a spine, and fuck them twice for the thoughts and prayers email they sent me just days ago asking for donations in the name of Alex Pretti. Absolutely ghoulish behavior.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

God that's shitty. You deserve better.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I don't know this person or the circumstances. But it feels like there may have been more to the story.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 64 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

A fuck ton more states should do this and include fire departments, sanitation, and water and waste management.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 42 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

From the article:

Farías’ bill comes on the heels of comments by Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Castro Valley, pledging to restrict ICE agents from all state jobs if elected governor. He also said he would take away the driver’s licenses of federal agents in the state who are working while covering their faces behind masks.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)
“Good luck walking to work, a—holes,” has become one of Swalwell’s go-to phrases during recent debates and townhalls.

OK that's kinda sick

[–] rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 hours ago

Washington is doing the same, at least with law enforcement jobs. It would be nice to extend that to any state-funded job.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 17 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

How about they just say they will be arrested. 🤷

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If warranted, I still believe in dew processing, but banning them from civil services just do it now.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

What does that have to do with distilling condensation?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You can't have dew due to you until you've paid your dues.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Wheeze the juice!

[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Was just thinking that! Call it a ban from society.

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago

Make attainders great again

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Sure. But also make their existence as miserable and difficult as possible.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Illinois is also bringing a bill to do this

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Farías’ bill doesn’t stop at law enforcement. It prohibits those employed by ICE since the start of Trump’s immigration crackdown to the end of his term from working across state public school systems.

...

Farías’ bill would extend the background check requirements to include an investigation of prior employment with ICE — along with employment at the Correction Departments in Alabama and Georgia from 2020 to Jan. 1, 2026.

...

Representatives for unions representing California law enforcement and teachers told the Chronicle they were not yet ready to weigh in on the bill.

Committee hearings for the bill have not yet been scheduled. The bill would need to pass both houses of California’s Legislature and win the signature of Gov. Gavin Newsom to become law.

:-/

[–] YellowSnowEnjoyer@thelemmy.club 5 points 11 hours ago

Good, very good even. 

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

National guard? Any public position?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Unless I missed it, they're taking about I.C.E., not the National Guard.

Or are you asking if former ICE agents would be able to join the National Guard?