(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
"Yes we understand the problems but instead of tackling poverty and widespread hunger and pollution let's just reduce 99.999% of the population by not having babies, which is a totally sensible way to solve the climate catastrophe"
Damn, we've consumed the entire Earth in the past 50 years? The very ground we're standing on must be made of styrofoam. Is the CIA working on building a dyson sphere in secret or some shit
These turds all think they'll be part of the "few million" who survive and also think they'll get to maintain their quality of life, as if it doesn't currently depend on an exploitation of the global poor
when you kill the bottom 99% and now you're the new bottom 99% :angery:
It's funny how true this is, some real "I am Legend" level apocalypse survivor fantasy shit.
almost like we have a profound ability to shape our own environment, in a way that fucking deer do not
Nah those deer have some deer trucks to ship some grass from a few states over.
love how these nerds are like China is an authoritarian hellhole and in the same breath advocate for a southern hemisphere-wide .5 child policy
Why do they still hold on to the "exponential growth" excuse? The population is currently increasing, but not exponentially, and will eventually plateau in the next century. Granted, the world will be a hellscape if nothing changes in 100 years, but the majority of consumption occurs in industrialized countries with lower birthrates. I can almost guarantee that this r*dditor has a greater impact on the climate than a family of subsistence farmers in Bangladesh.
