this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
188 points (99.0% liked)

politics

27463 readers
3220 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

House Democrats introduced legislation that if passed would force federal immigration enforcement agents to wear a public-facing identification in the form of a clearly visible and scannable QR code during enforcement actions.

The measure, H.R. 7233, was introduced last week by Rep. Ritchie Torre, a Democrat from New York, and referred to the House judiciary and homeland security committees. It currently has two cosponsors, Democratic Reps. Darren Soto and Shri Thanedar, and has taken no steps beyond initial referral.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

And I'm sure those wouldn't be obstructed or tampered with in any way. Even if they DID do this it wouldn't fucking matter.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Abolish that fucking mess and prosecute them for their crimes. We can carve swastikas into their heads after conviction, because that's the only thing we need to know about them.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

I think we should allocate a few billion to ensure all officers are given "calming bananas". I think if they were to eat the calming banana before their shift, it should decrease the likelihood of them killing citizens. They are likely acting out because they are hungry. Anyway, glad we found some common ground.

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 119 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Or... get this crazy idea: We can require them to remove their masks when on duty.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

As mad as I am, if I was tasked with defining a system of accountability, it would be to make absolutely sure every cop knew they were occupying a public service position. Their names, home address, EVERYTHING is publicly published. Their faces go up on posters in their neighborhoods "this is your law representative tasked with reporting and enforcement!". Just like a politician. They can be sued individually just like doctors. That should cut down on the number of ass clowns just looking to stomp minorities at least.

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago

How about both eh?

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What, and have them feel a modicum of responsibility for their actions?

Wow, it's like you don't even appreciate the roving gangs of unaccountable state-sponsored masked murderers that Stephen Miller and Trump worked so hard to buy for you with your money.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 9 points 1 day ago

Pretty much. It just seems nuts that the idea of a government security force wearing masks is not a source of constant outrage from the entire political spectrum. Accountability is a basic principle of modern government.

Even if you're a MAGA fuckwit and agree with everything ICE is doing, you should be gravely concerned that they're doing it while wearing masks.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@piefed.social 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jesus fucking Christ just abolish ICE already you spineless, useless collaborators.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

No shit. Like right now the fuckers aren't even keeping proper plates on their vehicles and are still running around masked like gangsters.

Even if they did have a QR code, what's it going to do give them a link to a hotline?

"Hello, this is the ICE complaints line, please leave your name, number, and residential address and we'll dispatch an armed goon squad to deal with your 'complaint' "

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

How about a mark on the forehead instead?

Carved logo

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago

Nice idea, wrong technology.

The problem with QR codes is they're a. not human readable, and b. not instantly verifiable.

Take a QR code and a stencil, spray a few of the black modules white and white modules black, and now you have a thing that looks exactly like a QR code to any human but in reality will not scan.

A better idea would be requiring a badge number to be displayed in minimum 1" tall letters/numbers on the front of the uniform, and minimum 2" tall letters/numbers on the back of the uniform, whenever on duty.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 20 hours ago

Useless if the traffickers aren't unmasked, not registered with the states, keep their qualified immunity, lack body cameras that are controlled by the states, and...LIST GOES ON

It would be much easier, cheaper, and more ethical to abolish ICE outright, and then form immigration services that are attached solely to their respective states. In turn, migrants will gravitate towards working with the states that don't suck. Red states can have the delusion of their isolationist superiority, even as their economies falter and die.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Oh this is sinister. They can now add malicious things to QR codes. So literally you scan it and tell on yourself to Palantir. Fuck morons.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

no one can force you to follow a link you scan, that is not how it works.

the problem i see in this is that when someone is shooting you in the back, it doesn't help much that he is labeled with qr code.

[–] criscodisco@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is why they should be disarmed, defunded, and dissolved.

They are enforcing paperwork. They need a pen, not a gun.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

yeah. i mean step one should be banning them from wearing face mask. wtf kind of logic is that you are allowed to wear face mask and then they put qr code on you to compensate for that? they will just shoot you when you try to scan it and say they were afraid for their life.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google and apple can, they could make it a convenience update. Lol https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/security/what-is-quishing/

I'm sure Palantir is motivated enough to find a way.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

technique described on the link still requires you to actively open the link after you scan it.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I have seen phones auto-open scanned links, it was one based on android.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

QR codes can contain other types of information aside from URLs (whose content can be altered remotely by the host). For instance, they can contain vCard data, where the subject’s name and business info are hard-coded into the pattern itself, with no remote connection created (intended for sharing contact info without internet access). That format might be more appropriate for this case.

This will not work. The problem with vcard QR codes is that they are too dense. People would need to be shooting high resolution video at close distance with a steady hand for the scan to be successful. The only way this could reasonably work would be if they were wearing large micro QR codes, but not all scanners can read those.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

VPN or IP spoofing?

The problem I see is if they're too small. Maybe somebody records an agent doing something fucked up, but unless you can nab a high fidelity screenshot showing the QR code clearly, does it really matter if it's there?

It would be good to have a digital database tracking each agent, saying "so-and-so was spotted at such-and-such place doing this-and-that; here are some photos and video evidence."

Or "Here's a group of ICE thugs brutalizing a bystander. Here are the QR codes that were spotted."

But again, that all depends on people actually being able to scan the QR codes...

I guess it depends on the data. I suggest it’s their full name, and home address.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

yeah lemme just pull out my phone to scan this qr- ah fuck they already shot me, like the last guy who had his phone out

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 day ago

It's a fine idea, but how are you supposed to approach close enough to scan the QR code if they tackle and shoot people for using cameras?

[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This needs a Not The Onion tag lol

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

The Onion can't possibly top the bullshit that comes from these people

[–] priapus@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Such a stupid idea. Just give them a normal ID you can look up, why should it be a QR code?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A QR code is just that, a modern version of a code you can look up. However, I would worry that it might be hard to scan or read from a casual or safe distance if it's not large enough on their uniform.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except you MUST have a phone or other recording device available to record it.

An ID number can be memorized.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Or a camera. I don't see why the QR code couldn't have the number underneath. It doesn't need to be a tracking device.

there were cameras like everyone, we got like 20 different angles... and they still murdered an innocent person.

training, cameras, ids.... those aren't the problem.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

At this point, the only reason to have meta glasses is because they always film and can automate identification without being targeted for having your phone out.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And the Democrats will pat themselves on the back at this brave gesture.

(This is sarcasm in case you can't read between the lines)

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 1 day ago

They moved out from "Let's give ICE 1 billion dollars for cams" since they found out that they still killing people while wearing cams.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

The fucking idiots trying to reform an agency that must be abolished. Who's gonna be getting close enough to scan their codes?

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, they'll just fuck with the QR codes and make them unreadable by adding in extra dots.

little bit of sharpie over a white square and BOOM, unreadable.

Or, better yet, they'll just do what they've already done, which is simply ignore the requirement. If they won't follow anywhere saying they can't wear masks, they won't wear the codes. Simple as that.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago

QR codes do have some degree of error correction.

Try it. Draw over some white spaces. It'll still scan.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 1 day ago

Unless the code is printed with cyanide ink, I don't see how this could be useful.

God damnit…

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

No deals. We cant normalize this behavior in any way. Masks off and ID presented or they are presumed to be civilians.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago
[–] AccoSpoot@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 day ago

Unless the legislation is "Abolish ICE" then it's functionally nothing at this point.

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yes, let's give them more regulations for them to ignore.

If there's no accountability or consequences then who cares if they have a code, number, or even if they are masked.

Except the last person murdered by ice was just using his phone

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I can think of a more recognizable square symbol to go on their forehead

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's retarded. Should we have it laser burnt on to our arms?.....oh its for them? Sure but add their name on there. What's the point of the QR code if you can only get to it when things are OK? As soon as the retard kills another of us their page will be taken down. the QR code is literally a webpage URL so they can just change it at will. Like special pricing.... When you're at home its $6.99, when you get to the store its $10.99 just for you.