this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
77 points (98.7% liked)

Slop.

771 readers
609 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 9 points 7 hours ago

Don't look at me, I voted for Hillary

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Oh so you're against killing hundreds of thousands of palestinians huh? Well thanks to you opposing that a few more high-profile AMERICANS have died!! Feel bad now?! smuglord

Yeah all the killings of fellow human beings suck. But a) Dems are very likely to have basically done the same, with fewer headlines. and b) Libs never seem to grasp the scale of mass-murder that's always occurring, and the necessity of dismantling the system that makes that happen, rather than just supporting 98% Hitler and being smug about it.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 2 points 4 hours ago

But a) Dems are very likely to have basically done the same, with fewer headlines

let's not discredit ourselves acting like these occupations of cities are something democrats would do on their own. libs want a negative peace, republicans don't care.

a Harris administration would be orderly and polite about it with warrants and other correct paperwork to justify their crimes against humanity.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 6 points 7 hours ago

a) Dems are very likely to have basically done the same, with fewer headlines

More people were deported under Biden than Trump 1 and Kamala ran on being even stricter on border control^[The liberal defense to this is that biden technically didn't "deport" people but used another legal method of kicking out immigrants from the country. Practically this means nothing, but on paper it means decorum]

[–] Midnight_Pearl@hexbear.net 13 points 9 hours ago

under the biden regime, ICE was sterilizing migrant women. white liberals offer nothing but apathy for the oppressed, and should expect nothing more in return.

[–] Poophammer@hexbear.net 6 points 8 hours ago

Like we stopped kicking the can down the road and the democrats still arent doing anything. Except for regrettably supporting nearly everything Trump does. Like as someone else said, vindicated.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not my fault that the Dems abandoned our president.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 2 points 3 hours ago

the only candidate who has proven he can beat Trump, and they just shove him aside? disgraceful

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Considering that Kamala Harris' administration was cooperating with the genocide, and that the Democrats were getting whacked on immigration, could you not see this coming? They would have deployed ICE in our own cities and made a bigger show of it.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 3 points 4 hours ago

They would have deployed ICE in our own cities and made a bigger show of it.

no way, the brunch crowd is all about optics. It would be by the book and goons wouldn't be occupying cities for no real reason other than stirring shit.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 24 points 14 hours ago

100% if you asked "Everyone who didn't confront Kamala about her continued support for Israel, despite alienating voters, how do you feel about not confronting her and instead pretending our votes didn't matter?" your question would either be deleted or caught by filters.

Rather than confront Kamala about her defying her voters, people are treating her like she's mentally incapable of making her own decisions and we all need to baby her. Why did Biden drop out? Because he got old and was having mental issues, and yet I thought winning against Trump was supposed to be the goal here, it's almost like candidate has to be capable of earning votes.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 23 points 13 hours ago

If you didn't put the lotion on the skin, how do you feel about that decision now that you're getting the hose again?

[–] immuredanchorite@hexbear.net 19 points 13 hours ago

Correct answer: vindicated

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 25 points 14 hours ago

If you supported a candidate who wanted to do genocide and alienated me as a voter, how do you feel about that decision today?

[–] miz@hexbear.net 18 points 13 hours ago
[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 12 points 12 hours ago

If everyone votescolding the left had voted for Gloria La Riva, none of this would be happening, either screm-cool

[–] miz@hexbear.net 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LadyCajAsca@hexbear.net 8 points 8 hours ago

how can they all look so snobbish while covering their ears??

[–] miz@hexbear.net 17 points 13 hours ago
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 18 points 15 hours ago

how does copmala feel about valuing dick cheney's approval over beating trump?

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 35 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

If you didn't confess to the good cop, how do you feel about that decision, while the bad cop is beating the shit out of you?

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 41 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Considering if all the uncommitted voters were added to Kamala's share, she wouldn't have won, I imagine they don't feel bad at all. Kamala didn't need Gaza protest non-votes to help her lose, she did that all by herself.

If anything, annoyed that not only did the Democrats never bother to reach out then, afterwards they still didn't bother trying to reach out. Not only did they not reach out to these potential voters, they actively pushed them away, doing things like refusing to allow any Palestinian anything during the DNC, DNC folks closing their ears and laughing, and Kamala making fun of pro-Palestine people.

[–] Oppopity@lemmy.ml 16 points 15 hours ago

Excuse me I'M SPEAKING.

[–] sisatici@hexbear.net 33 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

why would they feel anything bad? democrats have made it perfectly clear they will not hold any police accountable with their brutality

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 19 points 18 hours ago

The money that went to pay the killers of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti could've gone to a hungry IDF officer.

[–] towhee@hexbear.net 31 points 19 hours ago

There is no argument we can make or shame we can bring to bear that will stop zionists from trying to get away with everything that they possibly can. They know it's existential and will use every possible tactic regardless of damage to non-zionist institutions or people. No zionist can be trusted to hold a position of influence.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 25 points 19 hours ago

if you sat out my vote in protest over israel, how do you feel about that decision?

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 20 points 18 hours ago

IDF | ICE | CBP | ACAB

If you are going to bootlick Kamala for losing, then you are bootlicking all the others too.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 13 points 18 hours ago

Uncommited? The vote in primary against genocide joe? How do you feel that 90% of light of the nation (democrats) voted for the feeble cruel monster?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

When was the last time you visited .world, .works?