Oh so you're against killing hundreds of thousands of palestinians huh? Well thanks to you opposing that a few more high-profile AMERICANS have died!! Feel bad now?! smuglord

Yeah all the killings of fellow human beings suck. But a) Dems are very likely to have basically done the same, with fewer headlines. and b) Libs never seem to grasp the scale of mass-murder that's always occurring, and the necessity of dismantling the system that makes that happen, rather than just supporting 98% Hitler and being smug about it.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 6 points 19 hours ago

a) Dems are very likely to have basically done the same, with fewer headlines

More people were deported under Biden than Trump 1 and Kamala ran on being even stricter on border control^[The liberal defense to this is that biden technically didn't "deport" people but used another legal method of kicking out immigrants from the country. Practically this means nothing, but on paper it means decorum]

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

But a) Dems are very likely to have basically done the same, with fewer headlines

let's not discredit ourselves acting like these occupations of cities are something democrats would do on their own. libs want a negative peace, republicans don't care.

a Harris administration would be orderly and polite about it with warrants and other correct paperwork to justify their crimes against humanity.

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 1 points 6 hours ago

Perhaps not by the same means, but under Democrats, there was still widespread police brutality and murder of unarmed innocents. People were still living under the fear of violence, torture and being forcibly ripped out of their homes by ICE. I don't personally see a big difference between 'negative peace' and what's happening now.