this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
92 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

6482 readers
767 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The tech giant said providing encryption keys was a standard response to a court order. But companies like Apple and Meta set up their systems so such a privacy violation isn’t possible.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20260125043626/https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2026/01/22/microsoft-gave-fbi-keys-to-unlock-bitlocker-encrypted-data/

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Completely undermining the entire point of encryption. Why would anyone trust this corp after this? Not that they deserved trust in the first place. Way to push more customers away Microslop.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago

Most (US) companies don't consider the US government to be a significant risk to their business, partly because they're already subject to it.

They also commonly believe that Microsoft can secure these keys more effectively than they could do so in-house. And they're probably right.

Now, it's an entirely different story for any companies not subject to US law.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

~~That's not an archive link, OP.~~

Alternate archive link.
https://archive.li/Q4THu

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a long link instead of the short link. Both are valid.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I tried it numerous times. It got stuck in a captcha loop.

EDIT: This time it work but it took a while. Might be an issue with captcha.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Of course, this only applies to home users, not Pro/Corporate users... right?

Right?

/s if it's not immediately obvious. In Windows 10, BitLocker required Pro. I'm not actually sure that is the case in 11, but I would assume so. Corporations almost always turn it on, the idea being if their computer is stolen, their data is not. Maybe the drive can be wiped, but the data could not be stolen. At least, that is the idea.

Meta makes computers? You mean the Meta Quest VR headsets?

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago