this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
58 points (91.4% liked)

Off My Chest

1674 readers
145 users here now

RULES:


I am looking for mods!


1. The "good" part of our community means we are pro-empathy and anti-harassment. However, we don't intend to make this a "safe space" where everyone has to be a saint. Sh*t happens, and life is messy. That's why we get things off our chests.

2. Bigotry is not allowed. That includes racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, and religiophobia. (If you want to vent about religion, that's fine; but religion is not inherently evil.)

3. Frustrated, venting, or angry posts are still welcome.

4. Posts and comments that bait, threaten, or incite harassment are not allowed.

5. If anyone offers mental, medical, or professional advice here, please remember to take it with a grain of salt. Seek out real professionals if needed.

6. Please put NSFW behind NSFW tags.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Me: [Describes my assignment this term. It concerns a current supreme court case.]

Him: Wow, they're teaching you real ideas! That's something. That's how you make something of yourself in your field. What do you think about that?

Me: Uh? Regarding my brief or something else? My brief was just assigned. I haven't started researching it yet.

Him: No, that they're teaching you real ideas. Do you have an opinion on that?

Me: um, no? I like the assignment. It seems interesting.

Him: That's not good. You should have a take on that. If people don't believe in what you're saying, you won't be worth anything. You need to have a take and be able to argue for it, because that's what your field is paid to do.

Me: Well, no, the law applies to you whether you believe in it or not-

Him: No, it doesn't! Those systems were set up by globalists and Trump destroyed all of that. It's all worthless now. You need to convince people to believe in good ideas that make society better.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You need to convince people to believe in good ideas that make society better.

If he's right in something it's this very part

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He's not right though. The law is the result of hundreds of years of thought conducted by people much smarter than me. It's stupid to argue over things that are well-settled, like the right to not have your home searched without a warrant.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

To a degree you're correct, but something being "well-settled" is not, in itself, reason to disregard the idea of reexamining it. Many bad laws and concepts - slavery, disenfranchisement of women, and child labor to name just a few - were well-settled ideas right up until they stopped being so because the people disagreed enough to start the fight, fought that fight, and the majority realized they agreed with the fighters and decided to change things.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Tell your dad to choke on a fat cock.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

There are so many fun ways to tell someone to choke without bringing homophobia into it.

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 hours ago

Those systems were set up by globalists and Trump destroyed all of that. It's all worthless now. You need to convince people to believe in good ideas that make society better.

If by "globalists" he means Jews, then obviously he's just being insane. But there is an underlying truth here if he means "capital". The legal and financial systems that the world is built on have been set up by international capital interests. Trump didn't destroy any of it, not really. Throwing a wrench in things with tariffs and such, but that's about it. Billionaires and CEOs still have lavish dinners at the White House to court special treatment. Capital interests are still influential in politics. If you want to overturn all of this and build a better society, then you do have to convince people to believe in good ideas, but I have a feeling your MAGA father's "good ideas" are not, in fact, good ideas.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

Sorry, your father is a jackass. It happens sometimes.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sorry to hear your dad has been brainwashed into a cult. There was a good documentary about this called 'The Brainwashing of my Dad' in 2015, which shows the mechanism of how it happens.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

likely watches fox 24/7 and listens to radio owned by conservatives. theres loads of stories like this on reddit the past few years.

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he's worse. he likes Russian propaganda blogs and OAN. he used to have gay friends.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Did your dad experience any traumatic event before really falling into the deep end with that stuff? I'm curious if Andrew Callaghan's radicalization theory as to why this happens holds up in this instance.

[–] disregardable@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago

I don't think so, but he has never been willing to explain into why he got into the stuff with me. I tried asking years ago and he just gave some dumb "both sides are propaganda, I read everything" answer.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you’re interested in street epistemology, you could use those tools to have some impossible conversations with him.

It’s an interesting toolset people usually use when they want to plant seeds of doubt and make Christians squirm, but it can be used for much more than that. If you do it right, you’ll understand why he believes the way he does, and the conversation will remain calm and respectful regardless. It’s borderline magical if you know what you’re doing.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Could you elaborate? What is "street epistemology"?

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s a method for helping people explore their beliefs, understand the foundations of their reasoning, and inspire critical reflection.

SE isn’t about debate or winning arguments; it’s about meaningful exchanges that usually end with gratitude and contemplation. By asking the right questions, Street Epistemology helps uncover the reasoning behind our beliefs, resulting in the kind of reflection that can lead to real change.

Step 1: Build and Establish Genuine Rapport
Step 2: Identify a Specific Claim to Explore
Step 3: Gauge Confidence
Step 4: Explore Reasons
Step 5: Examine Quality of Reasoning

Source

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Step one might already be a bit of an obstacle.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

"Trump did away with all of that"

I never know what they mean. But neither do they, so that's ok I guess.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Authoritarian followers frequently have poor reasoning skills. Though I've rarely heard anything quite that stupid.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

reading and writing skills, the less they know, the easier it is to manipulate them to be grifted or scammed.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's basically right though. The "law" was established in service of the rich, to persecute the poor. The only thing that matters in a courtroom is whose lawyer can either convince a jury or bribe a judge - those are the skills that get lawyers paid.

It's not that Trump got rid of the old order. He just ripped away the veneer of "equality" it's been wrapped up with for a while.

Or in more direct terms: money talks, bullshit walks.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's just reverse Trumpism.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 12 minutes ago

And? The truth of the matter is that it sucks. I hate that Trump revealed that, but I've seen a pattern of behavior from him of showing off that money and bullying work.

He blew up a priceless art piece in the subway at Columbus Circle because he randomly decided the City moved too slow. The punishment wasn't throwing him in jail for destroying public property, it wasn't revoking his building's access to the subway. It was a minor fine for vandalism, and an accelerated timeline to build his subway access.

That's what he's always done. For him, bullying and paying people off has allowed him to do everything he ever wanted.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

MAGA? That's the Make America Go Away group in Greenland isn't it?

Fuck I'm so ashamed of (most of) those in charge of the USA anymore, along with the blind cult following.. ☹️

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Magats are why I’m always carrying