this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
509 points (97.4% liked)

memes

19098 readers
1434 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

What if top panel guy is secretly into VHS?

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago

Why not both?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

Funny timing for me.

Just the other day I was at a hangout / arcade kind of place and saw some folks playing a PS3 driving game on a CRT and ngl it looked really damn good. I was across the room so the low resolution wasn't as apparent, but the quality of motion and contrast works at any distance.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

man i shouldve kept my box tv

[–] eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because they weren't made as stylish. If you had that exact same tv, but with wood-style paneling and the occasional velvet lining, it would be exactly as charming. Nice style has been phased out over time, being reserved for extremely expensive versions of appliances instead of being the standard.

And like, that's not to say there's literally no nice style in anything these days, but the average product tends to look... bland and cheap.

I don't really think that is true, those big wood TVs mostly aren't especially stylish, and neither are recorded players.
Although style is obviously subjective so I suppose our miles vary

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

They have nice styling today. You just can't afford it.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 86 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

The real obsolete media player.

The year is 1987, Christmas has just pasaed. This baby gets plugged in down in the finished basement. You and your older brother are sitting down on the carpet for the first time to check out this game, Super Mario Bros. Your only gaming experience so far has been the Atari 2600 and C64...

Now this is classy.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago (8 children)

My grandma (who lived about a 12 hr. way) had one of these growing up and I always loved it. I was disappointed one year to find that it had been replaced since it quit working.

I would love to get one of these to use in like a multi-purpose gaming setup. Like use this as the TV stand for the newer TV so I can play newer and older games in the same place.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There's a weird debate about the audio quality on VHS. Under the right conditions (right tape, right player, right source) it could be shockingly good -- perhaps even better than CD audio, despite not being remembered terribly fondly.

If you really want to wow the ladies, be the one guy with a music collection on VHS.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Better than CD is a pretty bold claim. That format is near perfect for listening quality.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A VHS physically can’t be better than CD audio. The tape would have to move faster than the VHS equipment is designed for. The Hi-Fi VHS audio system can come close to CD’s frequency range, but there is still about 70 dB signal-to-noise (compared to CD’s 98 dB), and there is always loss when writing to and reading from analog tape. CD is not destructively read, so any signal up to 22KHz will be reproducible the exact same way every time.

Hi-Fi VHS audio is nearly as good as CD audio (the best consumer analog audio format, in fact), but it’s not as good. The simple fact is that an appropriately comparably sampled digital PCM recording will always beat an analog recording. You can read about the Nyquist-Shannon theorem for an actual proof, but basically CD audio is near-perfect for almost every human’s hearing range (most people can’t hear above 20KHz).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Well this is going to be an interesting rabbit hole...

In I go!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] observes_depths@aussie.zone 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's gotto be real analogue vintage

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Nope. Too vintage! Those are old enough to be haunted now. O_O

(Well, dang, so are N64 cartridges so...)

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Not old enough.

[–] Egonallanon@feddit.uk 25 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Because VHS/CRT was such a fucking hassle even when it was the best possible format option for home media. The dawn of LCDs and DVD was a glorious thing.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

The first time I experienced a DVD menu and chapter selection without having to rewind was just "Woah."

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Was, "Be kind, rewind" really that much of a hassle?

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Yes. So much so they made completely seperate machines to rewind vhs tapes so your one vcr could continue to do other things at the same time.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

VHS wasn’t the best format even when it came out. VHS was specifically designed to be a middle ground between quality and affordability. That’s partly why it succeeded in the consumer market, both the tape and the player were cheaper than the other formats of the day. Beta and LaserDisc both had better picture and sound quality but both had their own drawbacks as well as cost. CEDs were cheaper than LaserDisc and predated VHS by several years but didn’t have the industry acceptance of the other formats and had similar drawbacks.

[–] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

I had never heard of CED and researching it led me to the knowledge that laserdisc was originally called Discovision.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wallabra@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean I think CRTs are going back into vogue as a nifty thing in many indie circles, including on YouTube where you see a lot of smaller creators embracing the aesthetic nowadays.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

I'm so torn. On one hand, cool! These things are still seeing use and stay out of landfills!

On the other hand, always a bit frustrating, this cycle of things no longer produced suddenly coming back into style with enthusiasts, and everyone trying to hustle it to get rich quick on eBay.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Meanwhile the hardcore smash community never left crt because latency.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (8 children)

VHS next to DVD on a CRT is why lol.

Good sound fidelity is easier to reach on a vinyl record than good video fidelity on magnetic tape. Hence why even old TV shows that were shot on film look great on modern TVs, but their tape counterparts look dated.

That all being said, VHS has inherently more sentimental value due to its widespread use for personal and home video. Anyone still using vinyl is either a hobbyist, collector, or moronic audiophile who can't cope with stuff like opus or even flac/wav.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

VHS or dvd? That things main use is video games lol

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was always taught to be a bit scared about potential burn-in if playing games on our projection TV...never seemed to actually have it happen though. 🤔

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Try playing Control with all the settings maxed out on 540p and have it be the most amazing looking game you've ever seen

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wanna come by my place later and check out my... Sony Trinitron?

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Yes. I really do.

Don’t expect anything sexy or nothin’, I’m genuinely in this for the Trinitron. Do you have retro consoles or should I bring mine?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Don’t fret. In 20 years’ time future hipsters will romanticize bleeding colors, dogshit resolution and subpar color space and call it “so much nicer to watch”.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Video games have been doing that for over a decade at this point

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Mhm but aren't suitcase vinyl record players pretty bad?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›