this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
32 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

21048 readers
158 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Either not the right distance (try releveling) or not hot ehough (try to increase the temp). Those were the issues I had. If neither work Idk

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You might try adding a small fillet or chamfer to the inside corners of the model. 3D printers don't like making sharp, pointed turns; rounded edges (or wider angled turns) tend to print much better.

The rounded (fillet) corners will probably be less visible, and will prevent the start / stopping point where the problem is occurring

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Avoid fillets and use chamfers if at all possible. Fillets will often call for printing supports or just look bad. But the common 45 degree chamfer will be easily printed and look better when done.

Chamfers are to be preferred over fillets.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The corner is laying down. The would be no supports in either case, and the fillet avoids hard turns while the chamfer still has two (less sharp) angles.

Like 99% of things in 3D printing, "Xs are to be preferred over Ys" is an entirely circumstantial statement that is never going to be true all of the time.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

"Preferred" doesn't mean "all the time". But chamfers are easier to get nicer results with the majority of the time because they are easier for the printer to make.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

It depends on the orientation you print in.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ah. I'll try that, thanks.

[–] nocteb@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

I would also try to increase the printing temperature a little bit, that can make stuff stick together better.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm in agreement with the others. This is a printer issue, not a model design issue. Any current printer in good working order and running non-insane settings should be able to print a 90 degree inside corner like that with no problem.

Some possibilities:

Your Z offset may be set too high, so that your first layer height is too tall. This will result in the first layer's extrusions not sticking to the bed and each other, peeling off in strings like you see here.

Flip this over and show us the bottom of it. The effects of a too-high first layer should be readily apparent. That's where my money is.

Your printer may also be attempting to round the corners too fast. You could slow down your print speed, or adjust your linear advance settings. If you are using Prusaslicer or a derivative thereof (Orca, Qidi, etc.) there are built-in calibration prints you can run that will provide you a range of values to inspect my physically printing them, and allowing you to choose from the value that produces the best looking result. Ideally your linear advance/pressure advance setting should be tuned for each spool of filament, but in reality most people (myself included) don't bother until they observe an issue. I use the same settings for all PLA, and a different set of settings for all PETG, and another for ABS, etc.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

It was printed lying down. I'll add the model and slicer screenshot after I get home

[–] Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You could also try increasing your temperature and/or lowering your print speed. I had issues like this when I switched to using Orca Slicer. It's pursuit of speed comes at a cost in terms of adhesion.

Is that separation happening between the first and second layers?

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What printer, what settings, what nozzle size, what filament are you using?

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sorry, ender3v3 corexz, polyterra matte pla, 0.4 mm nozzle size

What temps? what wall thickness? What slicer?

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Looks like first layer adhesion issues, but given the print finished with no other issues, I’d call this a success. You might try adding a raft or brim next time to isolate the first layer issues from the print itself.

[–] HeyLow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

This looks like bed level being off, which is notorious for the v3, can you send a picture of your auto level screen?

[–] engonzal@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every time i see something like this, the answer is usually drying your filament. fixes all kinds of weird issues like this. Even fresh rolls sometimes need it.

[–] fufu@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

This is just plainly wrong