this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
93 points (86.6% liked)

Lefty Memes

6507 readers
155 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Communism is worker council power plus the electrification of the whole country"

-Vladimir Lenin

Hydroelectric power as a premise to industrialization was one of the core pillars of Soviet socialism, you are 100 years late. Also, 93% of solar photovoltaic modules are manufactured in the People's Republic of China.

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And I would have gotten away with it if it wasnt for you meddling commies! Good work comrade

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, energy has always been important policy, and I happen to be a STEM edgelord who knows his stuff

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, solar panels are the (a) means of energy production, so in that sense I don't see where any communist theorists would disagree. But please draw me the line from everyone having solar panels to "revolution" without any other Marxist theory.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
  1. the people set up local solar collection grids
  2. the state gets mad as the state ultimately represents the interests of the petrochemical industry (the state is almost universally a petrostate)
  3. the state implements a system of taxes and subsidies to reduce the economic efficacy of solar panels
  4. when enough people maintain their solar panels, the state resorts to its usual mechanism for enforcement: violence
  5. the people, confronted with the violence of the state must either submit to the power of the state or respond to the violence of the state with violence of their own

idk if i succeeded or failed

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure what to make of your assertion of the state as universally a petrostate. And you haven't touched on the means of solar panel production, let alone any other necessities or commodities (just a mention of maintenance).

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What? We have commie leaders? Who? Where?

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Oh I mean like Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, etc. The list is long and contentious. Take your pick, theres no wrong answers for my purposes here.

Edit: let's play a fun game, reply with who i left out. I bet I left your favorite out.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

New entry, points to you for naming yourself

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 2 days ago

Thank you. Feel free to read My manifesto if you want to see how the next generation of communist thought differs from the previous

[–] nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago

New entry! That's 1 point to nylo

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Lenin, Stalin, Mao I get. Marx? Lenin Stalin and Mao like to use his name while rejecting his philosophy. So it seems odd to lump him with them. But then I suppose it's been a common thing in many western countries forever.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Can you elaborate on how Marxist-Leninists "use Marx's name while rejecting his philosophy?" Lenin's major advances on Marxism include analyzing imperialism as a higher stage of capitalism, something Marx lived to see only the very beginnings of, as well as organizational theory. Lenin represented a return to Marx, considering the Second International had at that point vulgarized Marx into a reformist. What part of Marxism does Marxism-Leninism reject? You specifically mention philosophy, but Marxism-Leninism affirms dialectical materialism, so I assume you mean something else.

Further, Marxism-Leninism is largely an ideology practiced in the global south, not so much the global north. Perhaps I'm misreading you, but you make it seem as though it's largely western, and that this is why it "rejects" Marx. More common in the west are Trotskyists, who still uphold Lenin, or Eurocomms, who also uphold Lenin. The number of Marxists that reject Lenin, even if they disagree with AES countries, is extremely small, period, global north or south.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey dude I just have to say that even though I'm more sympathetic to anarchosynicalist thought one of the high points of lemmy for me atm is popping into threads and seeing you (extremely charitably) demolish people who clearly haven't ever engaged with much literature but have strong opinons on it.

Cheers, people like you help us all hone our thoughts.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks, I appreciate it! I genuinely am not trying to demolish anyone, though, I'd prefer if people could cooperatively build knowledge together. The idea of "debate" is so thoroughly ingrained in English-speaking spaces, but it isn't actually a very effective tool for learning, on either side. That's more the reason I'm charitable, I'd rather not have a debate, to be honest, even if that's what I used to do a lot of back in my more lib Reddit days.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well there you go out charitableing me <3

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Nah, you were charitable first!

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh nice try but you did not add any new names to the list, no points to you

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 3 days ago

Heh fair enough

[–] astutemural@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago

This is like when a kid camps out in the back yard to 'run away from home'.

[–] phneutral@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago

Solarpunk, let‘s go!

[–] jode@pawb.social 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And I'll tell you what used solar panels and inverters are cheap as shit on marketplace. Batteries are getting there too.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Man if I had a field it would be littered with cheap secondhand solar panels. Where I live I can maybe get a balcony one

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

Thats the stuff that gives me hope, keeps me going

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Buying commodities is revolutionary

[–] Postimo@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 days ago

What's not captured by the picture is that these panels are stolen from the mobile police cameras they roll around.

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dismantling the oil industry is revolutionary. And it will improve nearly every facet of life across the globe while be a goal that is achievable and happening right now.

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Damn, critical support to Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Tesla, Google and Apple then for promoting and sometimes manufacturing home solar solutions. Truly the most revolutionary of companies!

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Woah that's quite the jump. A very strange jump at that. Who said I liked any of those companies?