this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
278 points (98.6% liked)

politics

27195 readers
3531 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.is/NnhhZ

“That’s completely unheard of,” Janne Haaland Matlary, a professor with the University of Oslo and a former politician, told public broadcaster NRK. “It’s a total lack of respect for the award, on her part,” she said, calling the act “meaningless” and “pathetic.”

LOL @ the both of them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

She doesn't want it? Fine.

She has to give the money back.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I don't understand. Does Norway not get news?

[–] belzebubb@lemmus.org 10 points 16 hours ago

ermm... Not unheard of. Knut Hamsun(Norwegian writer) gave his nobel price to Joseph Goebbels in '43?

[–] Critical_Drinking@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

The demented pedo-in-chief wants to trade it in when he is in purgatory.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

She's right wing trash, too, isn't she? Why are they surprised?

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The problem that far too many people always miss is that appeasing a bully or a predator only ever encourages more of that behaviour. It never discourages that behaviour.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago

I don't think she's smart enough to read what you said let alone understand it

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

But it might prevent the bully from punching you that time. And everyone are cowards who won't gang up to fight the bully

Giving up the Nobel prize / lunch money might not stop them from asking for more next week, but prevent from punching you today.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who wants to bet Machado offered Trump the Nobel Prize in exchange for kidnapping Maduro?

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Oh yeah she orchestrated the whole thing, not the US gov't

smh

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The award lost any respectability it might have had the second it was given to Henry Kissinger.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And her as well. She's just Venezuelan trump.

Una vendepatrias

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Him pushing for and then accepting someone else’s peace prize award says everything anyone needs to know about him: he’s the biggest asshole in the world and has no shame.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget the middle part where he used the US military to kill a bunch of people and kidnap her main political foe.

I believe that if I were a past recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize I would be returning it. Not the money though, because fuck 'em, I'll keep the money.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

I think I'd sell it. Makes it even more of a statement, and even more money!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeahbut . . . See, we already knew that. Like, almost a decade ago that was crystal clear.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

For sure, as a New Yorker, I’ve known longer than that, but it still amazes me that there are people who don’t know yet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GeriatricGambino@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago

Wow. I'm gonna start using the phrase «on a scale from zero to Maria Corina Machado regifting her Nobel prize, how desperate and useless are you right now?»

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (9 children)

It's not transferable. She gave him the gold trinket because that's how you play Trump, but Trump doesn't get the actual peace prize assigned to him. People in here talking as if Trump actually got it.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

He'll just go around telling everyone that's the Nobel Prize he won for 'liberating' ven.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why did they give it to a known trump collaborator lmaooo

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

To appease Trump without awarding him the prize.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because there were (and still are) real problems in Venezuela. She is a key figure in the opposition, and it's widely suspected that the opposition party won the last election, but Maduro's party fucked with the vote.

In a sane world that respects Democracy, it sends a statement that the popular will should be respected, and that the Maduro government was illegitimate. I don't think the Nobel committee expected their award to precipitate armed intervention, which is the opposite of peace.

It's even more ironic because it's not like the will of the Venezuelan people is being honored, even now. Trump is ignoring Machado's party (even after "accepting" that gift of the medal) and is extorting what is left of the government in Venezuela to funnel oil money into a secret bank account.

Basically, the award makes sense in a pre-Trump world, but he has changed all the rules. That last cheeseburger can't come fast enough....

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I don't think the Nobel committee expected their award to precipitate armed intervention, which is the opposite of peace.

Then they're idiots and the prize itself is worthless. That was clear as day going to be the promoted result. If they just wanted to promote democracy they could have easily chosen an activist in a country not in the process of being attacked or an activist that wasn't currently encouraging war.

I don't give them the benefit of assumed stupidity. I think they were neoliberals who were particularly concerned by the nationalized industries in Venezuela and who thought even if they found him abhorrent Trump could be a good tool to help set the imperialist-capitalist world back arright.

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 15 points 1 day ago

Then they’re idiots and the prize itself is worthless.

It's been that way at least since they gave it to known war-monger Henry Kissinger...

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Then they're idiots and the prize itself is worthless.

I don't think we disagree on that point....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Exactly. The peace prize means nothing. Hasn’t since Kissinger got it. 🤡

load more comments (1 replies)

I mean, that's kinda what you get for giving it to a loser in the first place.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would be funny if the committee said that no one can have two Nobel peace prize medals so Trump can't be nominated again.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Marie curie, Linus Pauling,John Bardeen, Frederick Sanger.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I didn't know they got two peace prize medals each. Congrats to all of them!

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Tbf, Linus Pauling ended up a big pseudoscience guy, who likely died of his own BS

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Linus Pauling was 93 years old when he died of cancer. In the period leading up to his death he enjoyed mostly good physical health and retained cognitive function. Mega dosing vitamins is pissing away money, but certainly did not lead to his demise.

his wife also had the exact same cancer, and there's evidence that too much vitamin C impedes the biological mechanism to fight cancer.

yhea, at most it is only likely that his pseudoscience killed him.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Give the prize to a shit person, expect shit behaviour.

Also, Trump is a fucking spoiled toddler. He is an octogenarian Dudley Dursley.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] runiq@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago

Hahaha what a loser

[–] lemjukes@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Anyone got an article that doesn't require agreeing to a fucking arbitration and class action waiver to read? jesus fucking christ bloomberg.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-machado-venezuela-maduro-nobel-peace-prize-ed23992bccabf128b7e849259d3c29a8

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Too bad she didn't poison it

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago

The award is meaningless and pathetic.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's funny that he thinks this will mean people see him as the winner, in the future, and not a petty little bitch. This will literally have the opposite effect of what he's looking for.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He already got that sweet fifa piece prize, how much more proof of how peaceful he is does he need. I guess he's gonna liberate the Greenlandic peace prize next.

For how fucking worthless all this is now, at least the pageantry is telling.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 18 hours ago

Greenland should award him the artic peace price. I'm actually serious here.

load more comments
view more: next ›