I'm Germany, we have https://fckaf.de/
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
415 points (98.6% liked)
Programmer Humor
28450 readers
2878 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
A very good service by DIE PARTEI
Of course it would be them. Love it. Thanks for the link!
I totally believe this works, but there's no way I'm clicking on any of those links
A similar one here: https://phishyurl.com/
Holy shit, they're not messing around, and that's with the "Normal" setting
Also love the alleged directory structure
Firefox is not playing around
My ISP, O₂CZ (who collaborates with an Israeli cybersecurity company to "protect" (and spy on) everyone with default DNS settings) also blocks this one
this got me rickrolled (after so long)
Based on these ads, I do not trust the site anyway.
Love the concept, though.
Ad for an ad-blocker. Genius 🤣
Probably the only ad ever to hit exactly and only the correct target demographic.
Doubtful. If you still have ads in 2026 you never valued your own time, software, or consent anyways.
I wonder if it would be effective at blocking its own ads… 🤔
For a fee, probably
Looks like it got too creepy for its own good.
Link shorteners and redirectors, especially new and lesser-known ones tend to get caught in the fray with things like Google Safe Browsing (which FF uses as well) and Smart Screen.
It's because the original/shortened link gets reported and not the real/destination site. Then the domain (of the shortener/redirector) gets flagged, instead of the real site.
This happened to me at work this very week, with a redirector service that's a part of our email security stack. FF and Chrome were both blocking links that were safe, because the redirector service itself was classified as sus.
Firefox on Android doesn't even have the "ignore" option :(
Pretty sure its under a more info dropdown
listen here, you little shit
Cm0002:
waltzes into chat about deceptive links
clicks a deceptive link
realizes they have been deceived
Cm0002: "No, it is the person who posted the deceptive link who is wrong".
Lmao, it's less about the deception and more about where it led to 😂
Its all good. I'm glad it came across as good natured ribbing, lol.
Jokes on you I saw the ad first.
Aaaaaand shady link:
A fellow student!
aaaaand rocketship 8========>
alive internet theory
Pfft, I got one with TODO_Obfuscate_URL. I wish I saved it.
This is so funny and useless, I love it
it would be quite something, if the links actually went to/through malicious sites...
It's why they have a report feature. No idea how well they moderate things tho.
Site seems best for gags with friends.
I used to run a public link shortener. Once the scammers catch wind and add it to their rotation all bets are off. I got inundated with reports and my standing with my web host would have been at risk as well (long story). I now use Shlink on those domains lol.
I gotta stop trying these out. The other day something to the tune of hot-singles.xxx autofilled in my phone browser the other day and I was so confused.
You only bang married couples or what?
Well, my wife and I are a married couple, so, yes?
Yeah, I've never understood the URL shortener idea. It's like a box of chocolates. You just never know what you're going to fudge into next.
One benefit/reason is to make it easier to manually type in the URL. Like if it's printed on an ad or poster or something.
Not a significant benefit anymore especially with QR codes.
Yeah I get the idea in that since. It's just that you are putting a lot of trust in the source. But I guess that's the same with qr codes but at least you get to see the destination in your camera view.