this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
273 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

78661 readers
5835 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Nerds will do anything not to go for a jog

[–] LapGoat@pawb.social 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

to be fair, jogging is kinda the worst.

[–] mmmac@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We lowered your cholesterol. But you now have horns and crave the taste of human flesh.

[–] nicolauz@feddit.org 5 points 5 hours ago

I don't understand why you used "but", where it should clearly be "as well as"...

[–] bluefootedbooby@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago

Anything not to eat less butter, huh?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] prex@aussie.zone 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Bababasti@feddit.org 11 points 7 hours ago

That is indeed a very heavy side effect and could potentially be a threat to human life on this planet.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 33 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Is this the first human trial, or just the first officially sanctioned one?

IIRC there was that one guy who experimented on himself and cured his lactose intolerance.

... found it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3FcbFqSoQY

Nearly 8 years ago.

[–] offspec@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I feel obligated to mention that he doesn't modify his own genes, he infects himself with a modified bacteria that produces lactase.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago

you can just eat yogurt to get the same results

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

First-in-human just means it's the first time that specific therapy is being tested on humans instead of animals (e.g. mice, dogs, monkeys), and the primary objective of the trial is to test that it's safe for use in humans. It doesn't refer to the concept of gene editing or lowering cholesterol.

[–] pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 minutes ago

was safe and reduced LDL cholesterol by nearly 50% and reduced triglycerides by about 55%

From the referenced article

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Thought emporium?

Yep thought emporium.

~~But I think the Chinese scientist that experimented on babies did it few years before that even.~~ looks like same year, 2018, and thought emporium published first by 8 months

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6724388/

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 15 hours ago

That paper is a wild read

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 50 points 21 hours ago (9 children)

Bring it on!!!

Autoimmune disease? GONE!

Acne? GONE!

Don't like your eye color? CHANGE IT!

[–] Exeous@lemmy.world 46 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

For rich by rich, only rich get.

[–] MolochHorridus@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago

Now, sing with me: “Only in America…”

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 40 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Thats not really true.

The US is an exception but generally, the cost of therapies becomes commercially viable with the passage of time.

For example, our 2 year old daughter just had her DNA profiled because she has a few manageable, yet ongoing developmental deficiencies. Her DNA markers will guide her treatment.

When I was a child this type of treatment was sci-fi, and when it was invented you could have said "by rich for rich" or whatever.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

Despite my other comments, I suspect you are right.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Cost and price are two different things. Insulin is cheap to make but people die from not being able to afford the sticker price.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 12 points 11 hours ago

The US is an exception

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

.... In the US, yes

Not outside the US

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 13 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

Shit's going to get pretty weird imo. Hopefully it isn't used for eugenics purposes (it probably will be, let's be honest). I don't think that people should be able to change so many things that they become unrecognizable, but I can understand changing a few things per person, voluntarily, obviously.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I believe in bodily autonomy. People should be able to do whatever they want to their own body.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Allowed, sure, just don't think it's a good idea to completely change who you are. I want humans to be recognizable as such. I'm more worried about what parents will be doing to their children, that's where the eugenics shit becomes a problem. Getting rid of "undesirable" traits and whatnot.

[–] bobzer@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Some people are way too attached to their disabilities.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 5 points 20 hours ago

And enjoy the 5 cancers you just caused yourself by editing other genes that happen to contain the targeted sequence !

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›