I think the zodiac system being what it is completely destroys the zodiac "system"
Memes of Production
Seize the Memes of Production
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities:
But was Uranus in retrograde on both days? Checkmate atheist
How did you know!?
Oh wait... that was Gatorade... my mistake.
The person who downvoted you was definitely like "Ugh, must be a jiminy" or something.
I see my score as 25 to 0 on my previous comment. :?

Skill issue (you need to learn to not see the haters)
😯
If you ask people who really believe that, they’ll just point out the added nuances based on time/location of birth, moons, ascending, descending etc.
Yeah, I don't think astrology is any more real than, say, tarot cards. But both are complicated enough systems to be fun to play with, and also too complicated to simply 'disprove' like this post is trying to do.
Lotsa people think Astrology is just those sign things printed in newspapers (and, this does include some people who believe in it)
Same. I do not believe in astrology, and don't want people to think I do. Lol.
But to the astrology people, like my best friend, those two being born on the same day doesn't disprove anything, it strengthens it. They're both born on the same day, they're both globally recognizable figures, they have strong, divisive opinions, they are both at least somewhat charismatic, and they both lead huge movements (or, at least, are figureheads with staunch supporters and followers of their own). The details of them having polar opposite opinions and ethics is immaterial to "what the stars have destined for them!" Or whatever the fuck
and also too complicated to simply 'disprove' like this post is trying to do.
It has to make correct predictions. It doesn't.
There is nothing to disprove.
It does because it’s vague. Imo.
Well yeah that's literally what they believe. A better argument is identical twins that turn out extremely differently.
I mean, I think a better argument would be most folks interested in astrology use tropical astrology and not sidereal so the places they're saying the sun and planets are when folks are born in relation to the stars are actually extremely off.
All that said most folks into astrology are pretty casual about it and don't think much about it. Yes, obviously there are still quite a few people who do believe it hard core to the extent of effectively discrimination based on people's month of birth but they're still the minority of folks who do astrology things.
It's easy to explain. They're Yin and Yang. Two halves of a whole
George Floyd and Charlie Kirk also had the same bday
No see because they were not in the same place on earth they were facing different parts of the matrix so it all checks out
If the only thing different is their political/moral views then they're not very different, they could have the exact same personality only opposite views depending on how they were raised. Not that I believe in any of that either.
Me and Georgia O'Keeffe. I can't get pussy to save my life.
Both are heavily influenced by fascists.
Greta is not influenced by fascists, the fuck?
To be fair, to anybody radicalized generally, are we not influenced by fascists??? Influenced to oppose if that's not obvious.
Are you sure about that? Maybe look into the goals of some the people she supports.
She spent time in an Israeli prison being abused by the IDF for illegally trying to enter Gaza. That tells me more about her than any group you might be concerned about her supporting.
They're both young people that were "radicalized" (made stupid) by groups with evil goals. They both willingly put themselves into danger because of that "radicalization". They're both useful idiots used by terrible people for propaganda purposes.
You're putting a lot of stock into them being used by different hate groups. But lately those hate groups have been merging.
And who in your mind are these magical evil people controlling Greta?
Ready to bring the hate?
Rittenhouse's case was legitimate self-defense. No one has to believe me, the videos the jury saw are available.
"He shouldn't have been there!", is not a legal defense. Unless you want to posit, "She shouldn't have been there!" in this week's case. "He was there to start shit!", is mostly not a defense, but we're getting in the legal weeds here. Intention is notoriously hard to prove.
Whoever bought the gun for him, I think it was legal in that state?, should likely be in prison. Can't remember the details. Rittenhouse himself should have caught prison time for bringing the weapon across state lines. Far as I can discern, that was the only point at which he broke the law and it was a felony. No idea why he didn't go down for that. Anyone?
If I see that kid walking down my street, I might very well..., leave that your imagination. Let's say I would view him as a legitimate threat, especially given his actions after the trial. He's still looking for a fight, though I doubt he has the guts to draw blood again.
I feel honor-bound to point out every time somebody brings this up that Gaige Grosskreutz could've greased that guy, and it would've been legitimate self-defense, too. Wisconsin law be fucked.
You are correct I believe! Been some time since I've watched the videos, but I remember feeling the same.
Of course the pedo defender defends Rittenhouse.
Oh FFS, what are you on about? The one time I stated "attraction is not a choice"? And the second sentence being, "That does not absolve one of their moral actions." Are you one of those people who think LGBT is a choice?
Your mod log shows 3 instances over a period of time where you’ve defended pedophilia.
And that’s without getting into the transphobia.
Spell it out then. Mod's opinions are not evidence. Chapter and verse please. I'm willing to defend my words, and none defended pedophilia nor were transphobic.
They're deleted so I cannot view them.
But when you're getting banned from .world, .ml, midwest.social, .ca, and dbzer0.com I think it's safe to say the problem might not be any individual mod and more the user in question.
Whoever bought the gun for him, I think it was legal in that state?, should likely be in prison.
It was indeed legal in that state (WI). Can't put someone in prison for legal stuff.
Rittenhouse himself should have caught prison time for bringing the weapon across state lines.
He didn't, the rifle stayed in WI the whole time, at his friend Dominic's house (iirc, but if I'm wrong it was at his dad's house and both lived in Kenosha WI, while Kyle himself lived with his mom about 15-30min away in IL.)
Also however, it is legal to cross state lines with a gun, depending on which states we're talking about. WI is on the more permissive side, while IL is the one on the more conservative side, so assuming one legally owns guns in IL they can cross to WI, while someone who owns guns legally in WI cannot bring them into IL legally. Being that Kyle came from IL to WI, even if he had brought the gun (which again was kept in Kenosha the whole time, never crossed state lines), it would have been legal to do so.
The person involved who actually was a prohibited possessor and did have a gun, oddly was one of the guys Kyle shot, Gage Grosskreutz (now known as Paul Prediger). He was the one shot in the bicep when he pointed the gun he wasn't supposed to have at Kyle. He was also not charged.