this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
105 points (94.9% liked)

News

36233 readers
3757 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Vast majority of people are facing economic disaster? Have no fear though: rich people won't have to be giving up the silver spoons in their mouths.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 87 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is guillotine fabrication a soft skill?

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 16 points 1 month ago

I sure hope so! 🙏✝️👻

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 74 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Always crazy how the position thats the easiest to replace with a LLM, the CEO, seems to be immune to being cut. Curious.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah you don't even need AI a simple traditional algorithm can be setup to always make the choice that benefits the share holders. That's all they do

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You’re forgetting valuable soft skills such as sociopathic “I’m sad too” all hands meetings after layoffs, back room deals steeped in corruption, and pressuring middle managers to put profits over people.

AI can’t do that.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I'd rather hold a mushroom cock tbh smh

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He wishes and they will try despite LLMs being nearly worthless slop generators

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Humans are nearly worthless slop generators

-This class's mentality

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Has anyone asked these CEOs: “Okay, let’s follow this to its conclusion: you’re laying off thousands of jobs citing AI, and other CEOs are doing the same. There are hundreds of thousands of unemployed people with a gap of available jobs. How do you expect them to survive?”

I know the answer they’re thinking is “go work the fields from all the people we deported”, but I’d love to at least seem them dance or flounder.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do they expect to survive themselves? If common people don't have money any more who needs the bank?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

A quick search showed that JP Morgan Chase make 42% of its 2025 profit from Consumer Banking. What I couldn't find is how much of that Consumer Banking is "common people".

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I’ve been out in charge of ensuring we use the only AI product that is potentially capable of removing humans from their jobs so that we can prove that it doesn’t perform even at the same level of the average person. We know it doesn’t but proving it is harder since the team stopped using it as a tool a month ago. To use the tool takes learning a new job workflow for a proton of their function. It’s a pain in the ass and takes longer to use the tool than not (which is why they stopped using it). So, not all leadership is stupid and some do listen. Why burn a ton of money on this tool if it’s not capable of a better ROI?

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Guy who would let your entire hometown die to save himself a quarter thinks people skills are what matter.

Uh huh, sure.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

Once people like him are truly lords again they will want deferential but well-mannered human servants, at least a few.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Funny if we weren't working with a capitalist work or die political and economic system, this would be good news

Technology is supposed to free us to pursue happiness

[–] PostingInPublic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I have a question. AI is good at writing middle school essays, and can generate interesting pictures and music. For anything more intricate, it is, in a very obvious manner, so bad that its use is a liability.

So, how many desk jobs at JPMorgan involve writing many middle school level essays? If I mentally wander through the enterprise where I work, there are maybe a percent that would even be able to make use of LLMs to generate essays about obvious stuff, one of the positions being the CEO himself, of course.

Does anybody here see themselves being replaced by the bullshit generators?

[–] traceur402@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

As far as I can tell the AI thing is an excuse; the jobs are really being cut because we're reaping a harvest of policy so bad it's indistinguishable from sabotage, and the AI thing is being used to ease the fall without spooking investors straight into a stock market crash

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Only due to executive short-sightedness and the fervor around using AI to do everything. The truth is, I will get laid off not because the AI can do my job, but because decision-makers can't do theirs.

My hope is that the bubble collapses before that day comes. It's the only thing that can save me, the perception of AI in corpo culture.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Does anybody here see themselves being replaced by the bullshit generators?

That's why trillions of dollars has been spent on this rather than on giving a livable wage: so they will never have to pay a livable wage. It might be a good bit worse in many cases but, under their rules of capitalism, worse is tolerable if the rest of us are made destitute.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

chuckles uh-oh, I'm in trouble!

[–] protist@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does Jamie Dimon not do work at a desk? If not, how the fuck does he work? Sounds replaceable by AI

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Can an LLM play golf? Thought not

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago