Sunk cost fallacy is so damn accurate...
196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
Ad hominem is incorrect. Ad hominem is when you reject a person's argument because of who they are rather than the substance of the argument. This is them making a statement of their own, without presenting any actual evidence for it. (And Hitchen's Razor applies here: the argument can be rejected outright due to a lack of any attempt to provide evidence.)
Sunk cost fallacy is wrong. To make it a sunk cost fallacy, the argument would have to have been something more like "you were born as a boy, everyone knows you as a boy, you have a whole wardrobe of men's clothes, why would you want to give that up now?" As presented, it's somewhat closer to a naturalistic fallacy.
False dichotomy is right, if we assume an unstated but implied "and therefore you can't be a woman".
False equivalence and non sequitur are absolutely spot on.
Skill issue just made me laugh 😆
"Trans people are mentally ill" is indeed a non sequitur, but if we investigate it a little further it's even worse. If we assume an implied "and therefore they can't know about themselves well enough to say they're a woman/man", it becomes a form of ad hominem, and begging the question besides. Ad hominem because "you're mentally ill therefore can't know the truth", and begging the question because the underlying claim is "trans people aren't real". Why aren't they real? "Because they're mentally ill". How do we know they're mentally ill? "Because they identify as a gender other than the one they were assigned at birth."
Isn't a false dichotomy when two options are falsely presented as the only options when more options exist?
Usually yes, but afaik not in this case.
The argument would be:
"You are amab therefore not a woman"
Which implies:
"You are either amab either a woman"
But a question remains:
¿Por qué no los dos?
Yes that's correct. In this case, the false dichotomy is between amab+man and afab+woman. It rejects options such as amab woman and afab man. And enbies.
I liked "non sequitur".
"Yes but that's unrelated"
For sunk cost, I think the post could have illustrated this one more accurately as "You were raised a boy," which I think encapsulates the parental investment that makes it a sunk cost. That's how I had initially read it, at least.
I think the false dichotomy angle could also be expanded by factoring in intersex people who are similarly forced into AMAB/AFAB boxes despite biologically not fitting neatly into those categories, basically that the labels male and female themselves are a false dichotomy. Sorta blurs into the next point re: chromosomes, but I think it still captures two different ideas (Biologically male and biologically female are not accurate categories, and chromosomes are not indicative of gender identity).
And I think even the ad hominem aspect could be blurred a little bit to still make sense, if read in the sense of, like, "You're a man, you can't understand what it means to be a woman, therefore you're not allowed to call yourself one."
Transcription
A Bluesky post by "Sherry CD-ROM" (@sherrycdrom.bsky.social):
"you're a man"
ad hominem"you were born a boy"
sunk cost fallacy"you're amab"
false dichotomy"you have xy chromosomes"
false equivalence"trans people are mentally ill"
non sequitur"changing your sex isn't possible"
skill issueReposts
1083Likes
3150
I love Sherry CD-ROM! Go check out her youtube channel if you want retro gaming and philosophy delivered to you by an artificial lifeform (not AI!)
Yo what that sounds fire thanks