Forwarded
People Twitter
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
"Those were clearly inserted by Radical Left Hackers after the DOJ confirmed that none of the docs incriminated Trump!"
-Lunatic Rightwing Media Audience once their talking heads get done telling them what happened and why it's someone else's fault.
apparently theres furthermore 100k+ files. if it doesnt name any other politician or world leader, trump is only the lightning rod to give them all cover, thats what the Ds/Rs are desperately trying to hide.
No way they made this same age old mistake AGAIN. AHAH
Also.. nice link. I did not know there were still nitter instances going around after Twitter/X became unscrapable.
Redactish.
Honestly wondering if this was done deliberately by DOJ tech folks who weren't on board with the cover-up.
It's really not difficult to properly redact documents. So I can't imagine how someone could even do this unintentionally...
Never attribute to morality that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
The saying is usually malice but I suppose it still works with morality all the same
Hey there. It doesn't work in authoritarian regimes. When the only way to resist is sabotage, sabotage is everywhere
Given the sheer ineptitude of this administration, this was likely stupidity.
When I worked for DOD, I worked on a FOIA request and was trained on using the declassification software. The software worked by highlighting the appropriate text and then "flattened" the highlight so you couldn't do this.
The software was REQUIRED to be used because it would also perform the validation.
These people probably used regular Adobe acrobat. Because they are that dumb. And they don't know about proper FOIA procedures.
Because they are stupid.
It might be likely that DOGE thought it was frivilous government spending the license for that software, because it's the government and they'd use licensed software, so axed it out.
30 minutes before releasing the Epstein files:
"Grok, how do I redact a PDF?"
If true, their information needs to be noted if possible only after the arrest of all these other assholes. Gotta protect the ones that did not follow orders of this pedophile regime.
I have heard of a gov employee keeping a usb cable in a locked cabinet because they thought it had leftover data after use.
From what I’ve heard, it wasn’t released, they were uploaded and it’s url kept private. Imo they probably did that to send it to a few highly ranked people so they could check if they agreed with the censorship before releasing them. However, the URL for those to-be-released files were easily guessed based on the pattern of the previously already public ones.
At this point? Probably, this isn’t the first time we have seen thick exact rookie mistake.
Of course, who knows since doge or whatever probably wiped the people who knew how to get things done I it and replaced with high schoolers that just can’t wait to gobble elons musky bits
The incompetence is staggering.
And also has a long history. They've done this before.
Trump’s GOP supporters are all incompetents.
When you fire all of the intelligence out of the intelligence community, and the rest jump ship.
I really hope they're put in front of a panel and say "we don't have the manpower"
Never forget that above all, above the narcissism, the megalomania, and the viciousness, above all Trump is a terrifyingly stupid and incompetent man. When he hires, he does so that he feels like he’s the smartest one in the room. That tells me a lot about the people now running our federal government.
With all of its mercilessness, it can be easy to forget that authoritarianism is a profoundly flawed and short-sighted way to run a government.
So the entirety of the files released thus far, have been copied and unredacted I would assume. Might just need to buy some popcorn. Probably going to be a wild couple weeks.
I haven't checked myself, but on another post someone claimed that only some of the pages were "redacted" in this manner. If that's the case then while we got more information than they probably wanted us too, there is still some information that's yet to be made available.
Look at the address:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025010.pdf
Good fuck this is filthy
Except, if we’ve learned anything to this point, it’s that Trump will once again face zero repercussions from this.
I was watching a coffeezilla video on the new leaks yesterday, and I saw he could highlight and copy text in the pdf document.
I have had broken PDFs that lose the ability to select and search for text for much less modifications, and was wondering if there was a way to see behind the redaction.
I figured it would be a task for someone to look at the text in code and see the redacted parts, but turns out everyone can do it lol.
Why do I keep expecting the US government to be remotely competent at anything?
It was more competent before they fired everyone competent and replaced them with incompetent sycophants. It wasn't perfect before, but far better than now.
Propaganda i guess, the evidence for incompetence has been right there for decades and it keeps getting easier to find.
It's entirely dependent on which parts of the government you're dealing with. The parts operated by the career civil servants and people who got there by working the job tend to be run perfectly well.
In cases where it's political appointees following rules and guidelines setup by the aforementioned people, it tends to be... Fine.
It's the political appointees who actively disregard or are hostile to the civil service who are profoundly incompetent. You know, because they were selected for ideology, not competency.
For some reason that I think is spelled really similar to "traitorous anti American assets and useful idiops" the trump administration has been opposed to. and in favor of making it easier to fire, the civil service, AKA: the competent part.
It's why you can end up with the parts that work well, like the military, NOAA and others like it wandering around being competent (prior to the current "let's fire everyone and try to destroy the country" moment), while political appointees accidentally add a reporter to an illegal group chat. It's the authoritarian impulse to demand orthodoxy and committed belief not just from the people who decide direction, but from the people who make day to day decisions as well.
As a fun aside, it lets you know who was doing the redaction work instead of the people who would normally be responsible for ensuring a smooth release of documents.
The Guardian claims that there are some redacted documents that can un-redacted by copying the text and pasting it into another window. Also, in other documents, photoshop can be used to enhance features of the redacted portions of text to reveal potential characters being covered.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/23/epstein-unredacted-files-social-media
I predicted sleuths would be able to figure out some stuff that was supposed to be redacted (like “donald trump” redactions always being the same width or something) but if this is true it has to be sabotage from within lol
Idk this just being incompetence wouldn't be the most insane thing ever. I'd hardly expect anyone in the Trump Administration to know how Microsoft word works
Has anyone actually tried this?
I did. I checked both the “Masseuses” and the “Contact Book,” (mentioned in the X comments as being not redacted correctly), and they seem to be redacted properly. I’ve tried 3 PDF readers, but I’d be curious what actually works.
You have to scroll a while in the original comments to find someone who actually tried it, and it didn’t work for them either.
It’s hilarious that everyone is just believing it though.
Yay, someone else is actually covering it!
I’ve done all 18,000 pdfs. This must have happened in one document. The vast majority are redacted correctly.
This looks like a disinformation campaign to distract from other stuff. “Some people are saying there are word in the document that should not be in the documents, so we have to wonder how they got there”.
The entire thing is a classic disinformation campaign. Right before Christmas. Multiple tranche release. Then pullbacks and rerelease. Maximum confusion. Make sure nobody knows who to trust.
Fun fact: this technique was developed in Russia.
The Guardian referred to these acts as "hacks." I think I know where the real hacks are -- at The Guardian.
msm has no interest in covering it fully, because its mostly captured by conservatives
I love this shit, it really shows how ludicrous those "deep state" conspiracy theories are. They can't even blot out a document that incriminates their own leader.
It also goes some way towards showing how unlikely it is that Epstein was murdered and with no evidence/perpetrators of his murder showing up in the last 6 years.
And nothing will happen. Magats are going to maga. Democrats are going to democrat.
Edited typo.