this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
319 points (97.9% liked)

News

33733 readers
3662 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The move comes amid outcry from Democrats after the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts affixed Trump's name to its sign in Washington.

Donald Trump’s name is being attached to a new class of U.S. battleships that will have nuclear capabilities.

Making the announcement at an event at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Navy Secretary John Phelan referred to the warships as “Trump-class battleships" and said a forthcoming vessel dubbed the USS Defiant will be “the largest, deadliest and most versatile and best-looking warship anywhere on the world’s oceans.”

Trump’s eponymous battleships will be armed with guns and missiles, as well as hypersonic weapons, electronic rail guns and high-powered lasers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

The chomo fleet?

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 2 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

USA has nothing to do but spam stupid news. Fixed it for you.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Battleships are the opposite of what any military needs right now. I mean, unless we're literally going to start a war with China.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 2 hours ago

If this ever get build, it'll sink on the maiden voyage from the weight of the golden cannons just like everyone knew it would but nobody in charge dared tell the king. Oh wait, that was another time and place.

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

USS Floating Pedo Party Palace

[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

The USS Implications

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget the;

  • USS Boondoggle
  • USS Malignant Narcissist
  • USS Grifter in Chief
  • USS Beautiful Clean Coal
  • USS Shark Exterminator

and the new flagship,

  • USS Like Nobody's Ever Seen Before
[–] projectsquared@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

You forgot USS Wind Turbine Cancer

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

There won't be any battleship.

This is just another grift to streak the government coffers dry

Same with the " golden dome", "doge", etc... all scams so his buddies can get lucrative contracts.

Even so, this is suuuuch a sad thing. A five year old would make a fantasy battle ship and name it after himself. Its pathetic

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 hours ago

It's not even that. He's so desperate for any kind of legacy that he's throwing his name at anything he can in the hopes it will stick, not realizing that the first non-MAGA president will remove his name from everything.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago
[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 12 hours ago

USS Bone Spur

[–] pomfegranate@sh.itjust.works 20 points 15 hours ago

Sir. The battleship is unavailable because of its bone spurs

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 22 points 17 hours ago

Sir the autopilot is hard coded to go to some island

[–] Scottyc65@reddthat.com 19 points 16 hours ago

Naming a class of ships after a (checks notes) draft dodger. Makes sense to me.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 14 hours ago

As soon as the next president comes in, it's scorched earth time.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 2 points 10 hours ago

That’s nice grandpa, but it’s time for your nap before you rage tweet all night.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't we stop using battleships once stuff like guided missiles started being common?

We've seen in Ukraine how much destruction cheap drones can do when used intelligently.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

he's only calling them battleships because as a fascist he has a simplified understanding of history and a fetishization of the past. these are surface to surface missile launch platforms with helicopter landing pads

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm no expert, but given the distributed nature of the stuff I'm seeing with Ukraine against Russia, I would think a "not all eggs in the same basket" approach would be the best idea

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Yeh, even carriers are considered potentially outdated by some military planners should the US ever face an opponent that can actually fight back.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 18 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

So it'll be 300% over budget, be riddled with problems from cutting every possible corner, torpedo itself, blame Biden, and then explode in public?

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's entirely possible it will simply be a scheme to transfer billions of dollars into their own pockets. Things gonna be made out of sheet aluminum and zip ties and cost 30 trillion dollars

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I was going to ask whether this was a trump "sharpie on map but we can ignore it once the press briefing is over" kind of situation or more of a "musk drew a couple of lines, glue them on with water soluble non-heat-resisident" kind of situation.

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

So, Trumped up.

[–] DCErik@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago

How about a dump truck?

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

The world's first orange battleship that fucks kids

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Will they be gold-plated?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Why are we building battleships? Aren’t they obsolete? Like at this point isn’t the whole edge for naval dominance submarines?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I think ukraine has shown its small naval drones, both submersible and non-submersible.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Battleships are meant to bombard land positions... not go ship to ship. Leave that to the escorts.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Why put 50 billion into one weapons platform when it can be sunk by a cheap drone?

I don't get it.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Narcissism and cronyism. What other reasons does trump ever do things for?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, we'll be changing that. In the future, it will be illegal to name anything after traitors, and that includes Confederate Civil War officers, and all MAGAs.

Anybody that objects will be investigated as a Domestic Terrorist, and if found to be actively MAGA, will go to prison.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

The name Trump will be treated like the name Adolf. Orange spray tans will be the new Charlie Chaplin mustache.

[–] Bonifratz@piefed.zip 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

image

Surprised this hasn't been posted yet in this thread.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

They said he's a narcissist

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Literally the only way to associate the name Trump with Class.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

USS pedo express

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Is this like space force or the golden dome? Ie. a steaming pile of bullshit from the Swiss cheese mind of a dementia ward patient??

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Space force might actually be a good idea, despite all the bs and misrepresentation. I can’t claim to know anything about military chain of command but if they say it’s beneficial to have a separate org focusing on space assets like satellites, I have no reason to claim otherwise

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Not a good idea

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There's a reason we don't have battleships anymore all around the world.

If you put all the firepower on one platform, you lose everything when that platform sinks. With the sophisticated asymmetrical weaponry out there, plus the ability to use cheap drone swarms, it's much smarter to spread the firepower over multiple platforms.

But diaper Donny the crooked pedo wants what all dictators want: compensate their micropenis with everything made bigger and more impressive than others while adding their name onto everything.

One torpedo and your golden battleship will be a very effective new coral reef.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

yeah, they've been pushing for smaller and smaller carriers from what i hear from my former (he earned that former) marine bil

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Given his long list of failures and placing the most incompetent people into important positions, this ship will most likely do a Wasa on launch.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It was probably easier for the DoW to pretend that this cruiser is a battleship than to make Trump understand that the battleships he keeps demanding are useless in a modern war.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›