this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
753 points (99.6% liked)

Comic Strips

20878 readers
2779 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
753
Cusp (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 168 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This is legitimately a cool as fuck comic.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly one of my favorites.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago

seriously was coming in here to comment that this is one of the best comics I’ve seen here on lemmy

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago

I've not seen it before, so not I've got 20 years worth of comics to read :)

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 69 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

That this doesn't happen is proof that we never invent time travel.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

iT wOuLdn'T tHoUgH bEcAuSe cAuSaULitY

Side note i really love their time travel-diving gear

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I like the idea that time machines can only transport people within the time machines own timeline. You can go back in time and see yourself finish the time machine but you can't go back one second before that.

Like it's one end of wormhole that gets anchored at a particular point in time and the other end drifts forward through time, you can enter and exit the wormhole at any point in its worldline but only within that limit

It's still allows for time travel, and explains why no one has ever met a time traveller.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The concept of timelines (or that each decision creates a new dimension) ignores almost all of the fundamental laws of physics.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I mean, backwards time travel goes against our current understanding of physics. But multiple dimensions, or the many-worlds interpretation, etc, are not incompatible with our current understanding of physics, no, it's just presently an untestable hypothesis

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It doesn't work with the law of conservation of energy for one. Except if you assume a framework of universes, in which anything goes but then you needn't bother with physics at all.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You know what's funny? Conservation of energy isn't true on a universal scale in our universe in the first place. The expansion of our universe over time actually breaks that symmetry. This is why light can get redshifted over travelling long distances. It loses energy into.. nothing

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn't work with the law of conservation of energy for one. Except if you assume a framework of universes in which anything goes but then you needn't bother with phisycs at all.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago

MWI can easily ignore conservation of energy either by only considering in-universe energy or otherwise putting all universes in the same configuration space (much like one of those matter phase graphs showing how possible states grow on one side)

This does still leave plenty of problems around stuff like branching triggers and much more, though

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

Woldlines are a part of physics. Look up light cones.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 20 points 2 weeks ago

Forwards time travel is fairly "easy" to do. Backwards yeah that ain't happening.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This proves nothing, since having you in the know would alter the future.

Absence of evidence is not evidence.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nah, this is just the glimpse before the time travel cleanup crew comes through and clears up all the evidence!

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

not proof.

people die everyday. who's to say they weren't assassinated.

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Clearly this mad scientist handcuffed themselves, got into a duffel bag, and then shot themselves in the head twice. Classic suicide.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

Well... It doesn't happen to you.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 50 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Imagine the motivation you would get if people from the future suddenly started turning up trying to kill you.

"My god, I'm hot shit, I'd better get on with it."

Then you just start inventing stuff, writing music, starting a political career, and travelling the world desperately trying to figure out what it is that you're famous for. This results in international fame and fortune, and the attention of lots of women. But suddenly after sleeping around the time travelling assassin stopped coming. And it turns out that you're the grandfather and their trying to stop you much better protected grandchild.

Once the child is born then they are no longer interested in you.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 20 points 2 weeks ago

Though by pushing grandpa to become hot shit, they make his family rich and thus give the grandkid the resources he needed to start WW3.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Whatever he does probably makes them all mute, so that's why they don't yell anything.

[–] omzwo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Could write/leave a note but any reasoning can be countered with arbitrary time travel "rules".

[–] mech@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He looks like Charles Sanders Peirce, who proposed the implementation of logic via electrical circuits, and whose works provide the theoretical foundation for relational databases, computer science and AI.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Thank you. The comic was already funny before I knew this context, but it's extra funny now.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Think up a password and don't tell anyone or write it down. Now if you send someone from the future to protect you in the past, they can prove it.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Papa Smurf Red Lingerie

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Brilliant. How do you propose someone for the MacArthur Grant?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Thats what makes the multiverse theory so attractive. With infinite decision, you get infinite results. All equal, all valid, all allowed, and limited if any interference in them

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You mean in the infinite universes there is a version of me that has a puppy? Sweet! I hope that person enjoys themselves.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you stretch the rules enough, there's a version of you that is the puppy!

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My favorite thought with infinite universes is the idea that there are infinitely many more of me doing the exact same thing as me, at the exact same time.

Which means that if I say something, like, "Hello other Whats_your_reasonings!" we're all on the receiving end of the same message, and in a way I'm talking to them (or they're talking to me) from across multiple universes. Which is a pretty cool idea.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes but the name sucks. Universe means all encompassing, including the structure you're talking about. It's semantically impossible for multiple universes to exist

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Everything is semantically impossible. Thats the nature of semantics