this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
163 points (98.2% liked)

news

324 readers
1203 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 hours ago

Blasts

In other words, had a stern look and did nothing

Again

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 47 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Unless they're charged with perjury, this is just another example of the failure of the justice system.

Fourth box.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Perjury and jail time. So far there has been zero actually consequences.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Charges first, then trial, then verdict, then sentencing.

Unfortunately, the snail's pace of the justice system is its Achilles' Heel. The fascists are using that slowness to do anything they want right now, and push off consequences as long as possible. Lather, rinse, repeat.

So, to correct my previous comment, even if they're charged with perjury, the justice system has failed.

Fourth box.

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The wheels of justice turn slowly, but they grind incredibly fine.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So far, 21st century fascism has avoided the grind.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 7 hours ago

So when does that grinding start? Because i have yey to see any of the most heinous actors of our time see any consequences

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 62 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Instead of blasting them why not throw them in jail?

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Or Slam them! Mock them! Roast them! Give 'em the ol' Side-eye!

[–] dumbluck@midwest.social 1 points 7 hours ago

Hell, I'd be happy if we disbarred them. That, at least, is something we have proven to (occasionally) be willing to try.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

I'm OK with blasting them, just not with words

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

They’ll learn their lesson after a thorough blasting

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 5 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, thank god the government works on “blasts”

[–] Vertelleus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Huh. It's almost like oaths don't mean anything. A families honor means nothing if you have enough money.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

This kind of thing is why I think the founding fathers assumed dueling would play a part in keeping representatives honest.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That 's always my concern, HOW much money?

How many digits does there need to be in my bank account till I can toss family members under the bus with a smile?

How much money does it take to not care when children starve to death?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

One more digit than you have

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 2 points 8 hours ago

The language the press is using to describe this is complicit with letting the NAZIs win.