Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
related to the late financier and convicted sex offender
It was at this point where I decided to stop reading. Calling a child rapist and trafficker a "late financier and convicted sex offender" leaves too sour a taste
What would the next steps be to get the files properly released? Someone leaking them?
If I had access to that shit I would be the next Snowden so fast. We are talking about children vs rich people here, it should be a no brainer...
Toppling of the fascist government would probably be a required step.
I don't understand all the details (I assume Legal Eagle is already working on a video... that might even be on Nebula already. I should check) but there were specific legal clauses regarding what can and can't be redacted.
So (massive grain of salt), I would assume we wait for the deadline on why things were still redacted to pass (probably a few weeks), then a formal complaint is made (a few weeks after that), and then that times out.
So... probably come March we see if people remember if they care about kids getting raped?
In parallel: it looks like mostly it was just (mostly dead?) celebrities and Democrats who weren't redacted. Actual Democrats give zero shits about protecting clinton but the DNC does, so I am sure there are internal discussions on how to handle that which will end with Hakeem et al bopping their heads to Hamilton in a tiktok video.
(The estates of) said celebrities may actually care though and start going scorched earth. And I am sure at least a few of the redacted photos of child victims in adult male bodies and suits have public versions that will show up with a reverse image search.
And then you just have to wonder about the True Believer alt-right lunatics who are already breaking from trump because they genuinely just want to kill some pedophiles. And considering that the trump admin has very much been a who's who of deranged vloggers with no understanding of data handling...
What a fucking surprise.
History will not be kind to Pam Bondi. What a joke.
Depends if the regime successfully rewrites the history books. Or, if we’re being blunt, whether the regime ever allows another free and fair election, loses, and subsequently cedes power without just flipping the table over and cementing their power indefinitely in some fashion. And if you think that second part is alarmist or hyperbolic, you are not paying attention.
I want to believe that, but what we often seem to be seeing is the destruction of the concept of truth itself.
Republicans are destroying this country. Yet they are the ones that for decades have accused Democrats of doing that (and raping children). Imax level projection seems to be all they're capable of.
I was expecting nothing and I was still let down.
Just like the Mueller report.
Anything of value was redacted.
....Again