So, they're being obsequious to Trump, and that's evidence something has changed?
Am I missing something or is this article really that dumb?
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
So, they're being obsequious to Trump, and that's evidence something has changed?
Am I missing something or is this article really that dumb?
Ah, hope baiting..
Totally normal for a 28 year old girl to marry a 60 year old man amirite?
They've probably been dating since she was 14.
Really starting to resent these type of articles. These don't worry he's going to fall apart soon, don't worry Republicans are going to turn on each other soon, don't worry the other shoe will drop soon, Etc... Someone else in this thread called it hope baiting and that seems apt.
These people honestly sound a little out of touch to me. I don’t think Trump actually cares about the polls that much.
I think he knows that they have little to no impact on his position but that they do bruise his ego.
He constantly brags about his great polling results, but it has no relationship to the actual data. So he cares about the perception that he's got universal approval. I think Trump regards facts as things to be worked around with more bullshit.
Don't threaten me with a good time.
This is like the laziest of Kremlinology.
And it's an idle pastime to speculate on what Leavitt knows, versus what she finds it convenient to say in order to suck up to Trump.
Let's see, where have we seen wrinkled faces like that one?

Yes yes!

There we go!
