this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
298 points (99.7% liked)

politics

26670 readers
2892 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Eileen Higgins’s win has reset the city’s political landscape in some ways not seen in 28 years, and in others not at all

Miami's new mayor, Eileen Higgins, hailed it as "a new day" for the city after the Democrat ended three decades of Republican rule on Tuesday night in a stunning election triumph.

In reality, the result is more of a seismic shifting of sands given the magnitude of her victory over the Donald Trump-backed Republican candidate, Emilio González, in the most populous city in Miami-Dade county, which the president won in 2024 by 12%.

Higgins won the run-off with almost 60% of the vote, according to preliminary results reported Wednesday by the Miami Herald. More than just further evidence of a growing national backlash against Trump's policies on the national stage, particularly immigration, her win has reset Miami's political landscape in a manner not seen in some ways in 28 years, and in others not at all.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

After all those years upholding the embargo on Cuba it finally pays off.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 19 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Can we get a progressive tho?

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago

If we educate people on why progressive ideals are good for them (and mostly, their wallets), then yes in time. If we just assume Joe Everyman is spontaneously going to take up socialism as a hobby when everything else is telling them it's terrible, then no.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Slow and steady wins the race

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Nope. That's exactly why Hilary lost.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

He won because Trump failed to steal the election after a once in a century pandemic. That's who he was running against. Then after 4 years we all got secondary amnesia from watching Biden.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

He still got the most votes of any president ever. He got double the votes of Bernie in the primary.

The people want neolib bullshit. It's stupid of them to want, but it is what they want. We gotta change their minds on a massive scale before we can expect them to change so drastically.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 hours ago

I don't think people care about ideology as much as we are told. Just call it affordability.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

He also got pathetic votes. If he had a progressive against him (at the televized debates, on all ballots), he would have lost by a landslide

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That's pure speculation, you're just claiming what you wish would happen with zero evidence or justification.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

People want to eat (the rich)

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I think you overestimate the class consciousness of the average American voter. Biden didn't get "pathetic votes", he got the most votes of any president ever. Even just proportionately, all the presidents in the last century with a clear majority win have been neolib types.

People don't want to eat the rich, people wanna eat hamburgers and play video games. You and your little online message board friends (myself included) want to eat the rich, and if you spend all your time here you might fool yourself into thinking the average American has a somewhat elevated class consciousness. They do not.

My work brings me in contact with all sorts of people across all strata of life. The average person just kinda muddles through life, they don't really spend any particular length of time thinking about anything really, whatever their favorite diversion is perhaps (games, sports, TV, movies, etc.).

I personally talked to a surprising number of people who, after the election, thought Biden was the candidate in 2024. People genuinely just do not care. They have basically no media literacy, no knowledge of current events, no general practice of critical thinking.

We're not gonna get a progressive president before the general class consciousness shifts significantly. What we can get is an FDR type who will at least talk to the progressives at the table, and then get progressive to the table.

Slow and steady, comrade snail.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think you underestimate the class consciousness of the average US American.

Most people who can vote, don't vote. Give them a progressive candidate, not some obvious corporate puppet, and people will elect them.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Then why did Biden beat Bernie in the primary?

[–] smeg@infosec.pub 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It is Trump backlash. It will last a cycle or two, in which Democrats will pass some small policies that slightly soften the edges of our modern dystopia, and then Republicans will come back to power and continue the march into misery for the masses.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I see people mention this often and I understand where they're coming from because it sure seem like it's the reason thinking about how Republicans do something bad and it never gets done. While it's true that this happening I believe the real issue is actually not enough Democrats in office. Democrats when in power are often stuck with razor thin margins and a few of them are basically DINOs like Joe Manchin. If we had more Democrats in office we wouldn't be stuck with trying to deal with Joe Manchin because we'd have enough votes even without him.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

The alternative would be the church committee, where you have a substantial review and then action taken to help prevent it.

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Red states are redrawing their districts based on 2024 margins. This may bite them in the ass, especially in Texas, if they expect their massive gains with Latinos to hold after the ICE horror show and terrible economy. All of their new R+8 gerrymandered districts might not be as safe as they thought in a D+10 midterm.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not to sound negative, but they're going to cheat more. There was a guy that said he's being turned away to vote in Texas even though he's a US citizen.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/51354464

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That’s pretty messed up, but according to the article they only sent that letter out to a couple thousand people, which is not many in a state that size. It’s going to be hard for them to mess with voting eligibility on a large scale. Even stuff like this (which could be illegal), where they make some people jump through extra hoops to be able to vote, could end up depressing more Republican votes than Democratic ones. The big political realignment of the past 10 years has be largely along education lines - those with 4-year degrees or more sorting to Democrats, and those with less education sorting to Republicans. This flips the old system (poor Dems/rich Republicans) on its head. Things like voter ID laws, which are intended to inconvenience and depress the vote of people who don’t have their shit together, aren’t going to disproportionately hurt Democrats the way they used to, and could in fact have the reverse effect.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They are losing in some places by the hundreds and we don't know what the real number is. They lie a lot. They are not afraid of cheating and have done so in the past.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago

FALSE! Lying is AGAINST the Bible so Republicans, aka Christian Nationalists, CANT Lie! OTHERWISE they would Need to be Put to DEATH!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember there's also the Republican ownership of voting machine companies, the Republican replacement of state officials who oversee elections, and the Republican demand that their DoJ "comprehensively" oversee elections in states (whereas in 2024 they argued the opposite, that the DoJ should have no access to monitor elections). They have a number of tricks up their sleeves.

[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

We must vote for Democrats in large numbers, make it too big to rig. The more people who vote Democrat the harder it will be to rig the election.

[–] hanrahan@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This may bite them in the ass, especially in Texas,

Or not, an example Ted Ceuz is the most reviled poltican in Texas and keeps being reelected.

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Texas is still a red state, so statewide races like Ted’s US Senate seat are a stretch. Though Beto amazingly got within 2 points in 2018!

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

You would expect to see action in the primary, he only got elected because he was in a small turnout special election.