this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
24 points (96.2% liked)

Science

18494 readers
34 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de -5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

How many failures did they just make disappear?

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago

Even if we ignore the blatant "chinaman bad", this doesn't make any sense. Why would they disappear people? This would still be a great outcome for them even with 80% success rate or something. The only difference between 80% and 100% is a tiny bit of nerd cred in recreational science communities. Even the logistical effort of "disappearing" people, while keeping everyone quiet about it, is clearly not worth the benefit here, let alone the potential international scandal.

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Ah yes, the sinister Chinese. Even when they're doing something good, they're secretly doing something bad

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

love 2 come to the science comm and cast aspersions with absolutely no evidence

something something that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed similarly etc

weird racist loser

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How much gas did you huff before writing that comment?

[–] acabjones@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago

There's absolutely no evidence they didn't huff jenkem either.