this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
31 points (89.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44748 readers
2220 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I went to a small 'dinosaur museum' last summer in South Bend Indiana. I wasn't expecting much, but found myself disappointed that all the large displays (except one) were 'replicas'. I'm not sure why I felt this way, since all fossils are 'copies'. But 'replica' makes it seem fake.

edit: I think this is being misinterpreted. In my mind, all fossils are 'copies' of the original. The bone is gone, replaced by stone. But for some reason, calling something a replica doesn't carry the same...majesty as the original copy. Maybe it's just the thought that it could have been tampered with when making it out of plastic or fiberglass.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Last I was out in Vernal, Utah they had some fossils still in the ground you could look at

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 37 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Most displays are likely to be replicas, I think. Few people would be interested in seeing a T. Rex hip bone in one display, half a triceratops horn in another, etc. Complete skeletons are a bit of a rarity so it would be tough to find all the parts of some species for all the different museums out there. Also, in order to build a complete display of a T. Rex or triceratops, you would likely use all replica parts because you would need to damage the fossils in order to connect them all together.

Finally, most of the actual fossils are valuable to researchers and putting them on display in museums would make them less available for study.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Also the real bones are often too heavy to support in a display, so lighter replica pieces are used.

[–] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

putting them on display in museums would make them less available for study.

Very often, it's the other way around, museum are a storage plage for scientific/historical/artistic artifact and the be in display is a bonus.

Government own many objects that have an important historical value, and they can't sell them (beside law, imagine the scandal if the French gov sell the mona Lisa or if US gov sell Neil amstrong spacesuit) so better having them in public display

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

or if US gov sell Neil amstrong spacesuit

Don't give them ideas

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social -2 points 4 days ago

Exactly. So just an irrational response.

[–] Cooper8@feddit.online 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you want to see a lot of real fossils directly, no replicas, go to Dinosaur National Monument and check out the Quarry Exhibit Hall. A huge wall of fossils still in their stone matrix.

Quarry Wall

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

Ok, that is objectively pretty cool

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

FWIW, I recently watched a debunk of a creationist video and they complained about the same thing, while showing footage of one of the few real skeletons 🤦

Dinosaurs were real. We find their bones all the time. You can imagine that they're not in pristine condition, considering their age. We classify them and mull over them together. We build reconstructions. Some contain mainly real bones. Others don't. They are still of educational value.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, if we are talking about dinosaurs, it is real fossils of bones; not real bones, but otherwise, yes

[–] groet@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not sure if there are tar pits with dinosaur bones but there are bones (not petrified bones) of post-dinosaur megafauna like sabertooths in the La Break tar pit in Los Angeles. There probably exists a real dinosaur bone somewhere on the planet.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Sure but i dont know of any that have been found. So none of the ones in museums would be "real" bones in the way most people would think. I know its sort of pedantic here but fossils are rocks not bones

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

Answer: no

However fossils are relatively scarce, especially those that are in great condition (which means we can learn from them). They slowly decay when exhibited because of environment conditions, so you are very likely to find a majority of replicas.

Now, occasionally you do see the real thing. I remember seeing that famous archeopteryx fossil during a temporary exhibit at the Australian museum and I was completely blown away by the amount of detail it had. Mesmerizing. 10/10 would definitely recommend

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 4 points 4 days ago

There's no benefit to displaying the real thing if you can't tell the difference.

In most cases you're free to believe its the actual fossil.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

In the sense that the original organic material has been replaced by minerals? I guess that’s a version of the old Ship of Theseus question.