this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
179 points (85.7% liked)

News

36557 readers
1776 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What I don't get is why it took them decades to figure this out. Why have they been giving us sugar substitutes without understanding what they have been doing to us? Why were these approved for use in the first place?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CM400@lemmy.world 368 points 3 months ago (6 children)
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 148 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The real mvp right here, fuck headlines like this

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But if they just put it in the title, people won't click and get bombarded with ads! Think of the big corporations!

[–] FlyingSpaceCow@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The reporter/publisher also doesn't get anything

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Punk_face@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 months ago (3 children)

But…isn’t sorbitol a laxative??

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Yes. Its also a sweetener.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

I learned that one the hard way with some delicious sorbitol candies as a teenager.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

all the -tols are laxatives, you heard ethyrthiol, i think its one of the potent ones that cause laxative effects the most. i heard tons of people were getting cramps or diarrhea for people who sensitive. some people are mildly affected by it, and some has no effect.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 94 points 3 months ago

Sorbitol-degrading Aeromonas bacterial strains convert the sugar alcohol into a harmless bacterial byproduct.

“However, if you don’t have the right bacteria, that’s when it becomes problematic. Because in those conditions, sorbitol doesn’t get degraded and as a result, it is passed on to the liver,” he said.

Pretty big caveat but the sensationalist headline is all people will see.

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] doughless@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago

And after they had depleted the zebrafish's gut microbiota.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Comments like this are ignorant to evolution. Zebrafish are an extremely powerful model for drug development and toxicology.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

You are obviously correct.

Nonetheless, the headline doesn’t even hint at the YEARS of research required before this becomes something people should worry about.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 3 months ago

Zebrafish are an extremely powerful model for drug development and toxicology.

Sure. But there's also a reason we don't do in silico molecular dynamics, test toxicology on zebrafish, and boom done drug is on the market. Even extremely close organisms, with LCAs much earlier than the zebrafish, can have wildly different reactions to potential drugs and dietary elements.

There are things you can feed a chimp but not a human.

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Not at all, I'm just aware that this may not have any relevance to people, and right now it's little more than click bait fodder.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do you think scientists start doing qualitative testing on humans first???

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

No, but I do expect people to assume this is based on humans which it isnt. If this research eventually gets there then we can see what it says, but for now it's just another click bait article.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 35 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Copied from another posting of this article:

The headline (and the article for that matter) are very sensationalist and I don’t think they’ve presented this in a balanced way. They are discussing how sorbitol behaves in zebrafish with limited data presented on human biochemistry, and they discuss it in a vacuum without quantifying the amount of sorbitol it takes to cause a problem. Yes, any substance in excess can be harmful, but the amount of sorbitol in food compared to the amount of high fructose corn syrup makes it the substantially lesser evil. The artificial sweeteners are vastly more potent than actual sugar, so you don’t need very much of it to get the same amount of sweetness. High fructose corn syrup is used in massive amounts in food and is much worse for you on the scale that either substance would be consumed.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

There's a whole cycle of perverse incentives with University Press.

The underlying research is necessary and valuable but the marketing arm of universities blow everything out of proportion.

[–] network_switch@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 months ago

The article doesn't read as very concerning. Too much of anything usually means bad. Under the right conditions anything can be bad. Figuring out what can be bad and when it can be bad can often take decades. Don't stress too much on trying to optomize out anything that can do you harm in a diet. You'd have nothing left to eat and even the greatest collective of biologist getting together to make the greatest nutritional shake meal replacement would probably miss something that causes issues decades down the line or people drink too much and overdose

[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Phew! Thank God I'm not a zebra fish, otherwise I'd need to seriously reconsider my diet high on sorbitol.

[–] smegger@aussie.zone 11 points 3 months ago

Tbh I am betting that it's gonna come out that they've known about the health risks all along, but they tried to ignore/cover it up for profit reasons.

load more comments
view more: next ›