this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
112 points (96.7% liked)

Fuck AI

5157 readers
1429 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title shortened, original was "You Won’t Believe the Excuses Lawyers Have After Getting Busted for Using AI"

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some of the uppercase letters were made lowercase, saving a whole 3 pixels 😆

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 9 points 1 month ago

I know Ars is known for using alternate A-B headlines, but that's really absurd! 😜

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, spot the difference, fun game to play. Maybe AI is involved.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago

Ai added hidden characters

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

First incident: A really stiff fine in the five digits or bigger, plus mandatory schooling on the failures of AI.

Second incident: Goodbye bar.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

Did they pause to type into their phones to ask ChatGPT how to response to these accusations?

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lawyers are trying to outsource their own job and not even fact checking.

that'like your whole thing man

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah it's fucking stupid because this is actually one of those annoying niche areas where LLM's might actually be useful. A lot of lawyering is studying prior case law; if you can find a prior case that's similar to yours and had the desired outcome, that's a very strong argument for you case.

An LLM could easily parse millions of prior cases much faster than a human could, all they needed to do was actually fact check the results - the easiest part of it. But no they just took it as gospel because they're shitty lawyers.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

I just don't understand how a lawyer named "Innocent" could be so brazen in his AI usage....