this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
792 points (95.2% liked)

You Should Know

45438 readers
689 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 212 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Deduct. And the USA is taking the world in completely the opposite direction from where it needs to go.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

It would be nice if we could deduce them.

[–] thfi@discuss.tchncs.de 147 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Finally! Do you have an idea how expensive those things are and how much my wage slaves must work for that?

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

The cost ranges from $30,000 to over $100M

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 109 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

The law, in its majestic equality, allows rich and poor alike to deduct private jet expenses from their taxes.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 81 points 4 months ago (3 children)

For example, a $3 million aircraft purchase – of America’s favorite business jet, the Pilatus PC‑12 – could potentially lower your tax liability by over $1 million if you’re in the 35 % bracket. This isn’t just savings; the Big Beautiful Bill private aircraft subsidy offers financial strategy at its finest. You can read more about the tax benefits of private aircraft ownership in our special report here.

Thanks magats

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The PC-12 is a turboprop, not a jet, though.

It's a leech hauler alright, but not a jet.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The distinction isn't relevant to the point being made. Although the article title says "jets", the body of the article uses the more generic "aircraft" interchangeably with "jet."

~~I'd expect this is applicable to helicopters as well, though they have a different usage.~~

Edit: I looked it up and apparently helicopters are not included. The distinguishing feature is "fixed wing" aircraft.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Certainly a bigger problem is how someone who can afford over $1M private jet would be in only the 35% bracket

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] who@feddit.org 60 points 4 months ago
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 48 points 4 months ago (1 children)

YSK that eating the rich is a nutritious way to redistribute wealth

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don’t eat shit, mulch the rich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schwim@piefed.zip 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 5 points 4 months ago

indeductable!

[–] whimsy@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago

Great deduction!

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 38 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You allowed this before proper health care because that's Socialism? Communism? Gay?

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

To be fair, America has the best aviation infrastructure in the world, and it is almost entirely socialized. So we do socialism sometimes

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 37 points 4 months ago (15 children)

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] callcc@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I like the that term. Just like obese personality for people who need large cars or are excessively loud.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's bonus depreciaton, not expenses, and it's a business tax benefit, not an individual tax benefit.

Businesses can, and for a long time, have been able to deduct aircraft expenses. Nothing has changed there, and it's not unique to this turd of a president. The return of bonus depreciation lets them depreciate faster, but again, depreciation is not new. It's reasonable to removed about that, but you have to get every fact wrong to make that complaint.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And let me tell you how this works with cars. With planes it is the same, except that the savings are even better.

A real rich person owns no cars. He owns a car sales company. That company has a few select cars, which the rich person can "test drive" whenever they like. If the prime time of a car is over, the car is sold and a new one is bought. The car sales company pays for everything: purchase, insurance, taxes, fuel, cleaning, etc. Of course, this company does not make any profits. On the contrary. So the rich person pays for these losses, and those payments are tax deductable.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

This also applies to houses, boats, and inevitably surrogates now that they're using them like pack mules.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 months ago

deduce private jet expenses

I can deduce it right from a receipt, if they give you one.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 18 points 4 months ago

Thank you, government. That is really an improvement of my life!

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Ah, and only 90% of gambling losses. Looks like another point against the poor.

Not that I’m condoning gambling, but, weird how those things impact polar opposite sides of the wealth gap.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

In my experience, poor people gamble a lot. I've never seen a rich person buy a lottery ticket

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That’s the point. Poor people gambling can’t write off their losses on taxes. Well, they can, just only up to 90%. Rather than all of it like it has been.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Pretty sure poor people don't have enough money to hire someone who can write off losses

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

They don't make enough to itemize in the first place, they'll just take the standard deduction. (Unless they lost like $20k on scratchers somehow)

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Anyone can write off stuff on their taxes. It's pretty easy actually.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'm always terrified to write stuff off because I fear I will accidentally write something off that I'm not really allowed to due to some obscure legalese and then I will get audited in 5 five years and owe 10 grand in late fees and interest or some shit.

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I too get nervous every time I do my taxes but I figure if I'm honest about it they'll forgive most mistakes

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In most countries for average people if you can make a convincing argument about why you thought it would be allowed and can argue it with a straight face they arent interested in nailing you over it because it isnt worth their time.

I asked my accountant "Hey, when I take sick leave at work and I have to get a doctors certificate to get paid for those days, does that make the doctors visit a work expense?"

He said "Thats a legitimate enough argument that if you want me to I'll put them on your return. Dont know if it would pass an audit but the reasoning is solid"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

rich people gamble plenty, they just call it investing and get way more tax write offs for doing so

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wait, if you buy a 10 dollar scratch card, you can deduct 9 dollars from you income for tax purposes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I am pretty sure this isn’t new. Air travel is like any other business travel expense, and plane are an expense like a plumbers van is..

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

My plumber's van has two hot stewardesses.

[–] sausager@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Literally no one needs a private plane.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MissingGhost@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why not make it be for bicycle repairs instead?

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

If I get write-offs for my bike collection, I will also be stimulating the construction sector as I barely have room to store them all as it is. :-D

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dil@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

We couldve been a flight based country instead of cars if we went in another direction, when we had more pilots than planes

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›