this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
184 points (98.4% liked)

politics

26466 readers
2356 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump appears poised to announce a two-year extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies, due to expire at the end of December, while setting new limits on who is eligible to receive the tax credits, according to reports.

Without an extension of Covid-19-era Obamacare subsidies, insurance premiums for nearly 22 million American citizens threaten to more than double early next year, a point made repeatedly by Democrats during the recent 43-day government shutdown, who refused to sign a stopgap spending bill that did not address the problem.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

This is him extending his power. The president does not legally control the power of the purse. Congress does. The president can't legally do this. Choosing a popular position with the citizens, and one Democrats can't argue against without looking bad, gives him the clear to do this. Once it's done once they can point back to it and ask why no one thought it was wrong this time.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

Dems will vote for the tax credit expansion but I wonder if he will actually be able to drum up support from republicans. Because despite his acting like he can make this happen the purse string are still controlled by congress and the GOP isn't as worried about their legacy as he might be.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

And here after I thought Democrats had complete ownership of the-shutdown-was-a-waste-of-effort, Trump swoops in to extends ACA for no reason in capitulation to no one. Showing that Republicans also were fighting for nothing. Clown government.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Where the absolute holy fuck is this fucksticks's fucking healthcare plan? Where is it? It's been a year. WHERE IS IT.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

The concept of a plan.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

I just read another article saying he caved on this. What is the actual situation?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

For 2 years. Fucking predicatable.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Just in time to use a further extension as a political lool for the 2028 election...

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

What about medicade? They still throwing the elderly and disabled on the street?

[–] tallricefarmer@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago

'He suggested an act to that effect should be known as “Trumpcare” and claimed it would empower citizens and leave them feeling like entrepreneurs.'

I remember Republicans dubbing ACA as Obamacare derogatorily. But of course Trump wants a Trumpcare

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 119 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Remember when we had a legislative branch and not an autocrat?

We need to stop normalizing this unilateral shit

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yep. This is most likely illegal. As usual.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wow maybe that latest election had a bigger effect on the GOP thick skulls than anyone realized. It's just taking a bit to sink in.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No. It is all performative. They still want to end ACA it is just not politically savy at this time. More important to stack courts, wreck government beauracracy, and control elections.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It’s 2 years. Not permanent. Like his tax cuts to everybody expired after he left office. Except corporate tax cuts. Those were forever.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›