this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
301 points (99.0% liked)

News

37211 readers
2522 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The “department of government efficiency” (Doge) has apparently been dissolved with eight months still remaining on its contract, ending a drawn-out campaign of invading federal agencies and firing thousands of federal workers.

“That doesn’t exist,” office of personnel management (OPM) director Scott Kupor told Reuters earlier this month when asked about Doge’s status, adding that it was no longer a “centralized entity”.

The statement confirmed longstanding suspicions that Doge, created by an executive order that Donald Trump signed on his first day, was on its way out. The tech billionaire Elon Musk and the former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy were tapped to lead the effort and were expected to drive “large scale structural reform” through 24 July 2026.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 94 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why would musk need it anymore? He got what he paid for.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago (5 children)

It wasn't a serious attempt at what it's name suggests it might be about. It was just about destroying things some billionaires didn't like.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 63 points 4 months ago

This is it exactly. He just wanted to gut the agencies that were actively investigating him or were threatening to regulate his businesses. There was no altruistic motive behind any of it. He paid for the access he needed to destroy that infrastructure.

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 19 points 4 months ago

It was also about getting their hands on sensitive government data.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

Wait... are you telling me that an agency named after a meme was fundamentally unserious??

And stealing our data.

And installing malware.

And...

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Nah, it would be different if that was it

At least some of them legit thought they were helping, and everyone else was an idiot.

Huge changes were given ridiculous deadlines and zero guidance. A lot of that shit won't kick in till new year, agencies are legally required to follow thru, there's no off ramp.

A lot of basic shit no one thinks about is going to stop breaking, in addition to the shit they intentionally broke.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The fact that the American public doesn't care about this is pretty much what has allowed Trumpism to arise.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

I care. I don't know what I can do about it, but I care.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 33 points 4 months ago

The United States was my grandpa and Doge was Microsoft on the phone asking him to give them access to his computer. He did. Every time.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 14 points 4 months ago

What a great gig. Get paid in a contract (probably up front), cause lots of damage without any accountability, and then quit early.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

So can we get United States Digital Service back? You know the thing that was working just fine before it was renamed and broken?

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

Are you saying that they got cut for wasting government money?