this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
227 points (97.9% liked)

World News

50946 readers
3021 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A survey published last week suggested 97% of respondents could not spot an AI-generated song. But there are some telltale signs - if you know where to look.

Here's a quick guide ...

  • No live performances or social media presence

  • 'A mashup of rock hits in a blender'

A song with a formulaic feel - sweet but without much substance or emotional weight - can be a sign of AI, says the musician and technology speaker, as well as vocals that feel breathless.

  • 'AI hasn't felt heartbreak yet'

"AI hasn't felt heartbreak yet... It knows patterns," he explains. "What makes music human is not just sound but the stories behind it."

  • Steps toward transparency

In January, the streaming platform Deezer launched an AI detection tool, followed this summer by a system which tags AI-generated music.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

Generally it is incredibly bland even blander than regular mainstream music.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 78 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Lol this is how pop music is created with formulaic, focus group approved garbage over engineered to be the most palatable and sell well.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 37 points 5 days ago (7 children)

If that gets killed off along with AI-generated music, that seems to be to be win/win.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Tip 1: It's being promoted. The music industry would love to get rid of musicians.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And the Records Department, after all, was itself only a single branch of the Ministry of Truth, whose primary job was not to reconstruct the past but to supply the citizens of Oceania with newspapers, films, textbooks, telescreen Free eBooks at Planet eBook.com programmes, plays, novels—with every conceivable kind of information, instruction, or entertainment, from a statue to a slogan, from a lyric poem to a biological treatise, and from a child’s spelling-book to a Newspeak dictionary. And the Ministry had not only to supply the multifarious needs of the party, but also to repeat the whole operation at a lower level for the benefit of the proletariat. There was a whole chain of separate departments dealing with proletarian lit- erature, music, drama, and entertainment generally. Here were produced rubbishy newspapers containing almost nothing except sport, crime and astrology, sensational five-cent novelettes, films oozing with sex, and sentimen- tal songs which were composed entirely by mechanical means on a special kind of kaleidoscope known as a ver- sificator. (George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Tour)

[–] CarrierLost@infosec.pub 11 points 4 days ago

In case you were curious, apparently you can get Free eBooks at Planet eBook.com.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 3 points 3 days ago

The versifivator is an implausibly close description of LLMs considering how long ago it was written

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Do you know why I listen to real artists? Because there is a story behind it, someone had an inspiration and wrote a fucking good album. AI has no story to tell, didn't broke up with someone to write a song, and certainly won't make star gaze the live concert I went to.

[–] III@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And here I was only listening to music because the of the joy I get from some producer getting more and more percentage of the profits. Maybe I should rethink my reasoning...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 37 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I fell hard for Dysmn, who was suspiciously dropping new music every few days. I really liked the sound, and I haven't found anything that sounds like that since. 270+ videos in under 2 years. I realized it wasn't human after a month or two.

Soooo, if anybody knows a great jazzy EDM metal noise, let me know.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I looked that up, and it actually slaps. Not really my genre, but I can see how people would assume it’s real people.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (29 children)

Humans are primarily visual creatures, so we can detect the slop in AI images a LOT faster than we can in audio.

Human artists are going to have to get a lot weirder to out-innovate AI music, and I’m actually happy about that. Weird music is the best.

load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)
  • dumbass nonsensical lyrics
  • bland basic bitch tone
  • superfluous background music
  • digital voice that sounds like it's been through a syth incorrectly
[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The last one is the most obvious one. But they're getting better at concealing it.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You just described 64% of all human-made music.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

even shit music takes effort and talent.

AI is literally the theft of talent and the absence of effort.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

even shit music takes effort and talent.

Hm, not really unless you consider effort anything that's non-zero.

I just shat my pants.

I just shat my pants.

Shit got so itchy,

I just shat my pants.

There you go. It took me 10 seconds of effort to come up with that masterpiece. Where's my Grammy?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I was looking for videogame remixes one day and found a channel doing Little Nemo from the NES. I used to love that game and thought it was an odd pick for remixes, one you don't see too often so I clicked on it and ... it was incredibly underwhelming. I listened for a few minutes and something was kind of off but I couldn't quite put my finger on it. It was AI of course.

I'm not much of a music person, I've been listening to it daily for my entire life but I don't know much about theory. Still, when it comes to remixes, you can usually tell why someone remixed a song. They like that particular song, or there's a motif that really struck them. They'll pick out certain sounds or elements and build on them, single them out and rearrange them. It's very intentional and you can tell.

AI-generated remixes lack this intentionality. It was like someone had twisted a dial that just said "complexity" and that was it. There were more intricate layers of beats and instrumentation on top, but it wasn't doing anything. I sat there and listened for 15 minutes and it was like I heard nothing. Nothing new stuck in my head, there was no riff or little melody that made go, "Aw fuck yeah! This is what it's about!"

That's how you can tell AI generated music.

Sadly, a lot of slower and minimalist genres have been decimated by it though. Vaporwave, chillcore, dungeonsynth. A lot of these had large bodies of work to train on and it's a lot harder to tell due to their subtler nature, but you'll usually notice the artist has a new hour-long upload every day. If you click through it at random, you'll begin to notice that while the tones shift, the overall pattern of the entire hour-long mix is still kind of the same?

It's bleak, man. Fuck that shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago

My first experience with AI music was when I was on my usual 90s hip-hop/rap vibe and got recommended some channels with alleged underground hits. There definitely were a couple channels that put out legit mixes that did have a lot of music and artists I didn't know prior, but one of the mixes was weird. I could tell immediately, less than a minute in, mainly because of the vocals that sounded super generic as well kind of robotic in addition to a very out of place beat that doesn't sound at all like it'd belong in the 90s/2000s era of rap music. Had it not been for the vocals in tandem with the mismatched beat (obviously created by someone who doesn't know jack about the music genre and the ear it's supposed to represent), I might not have spotted the AI involved.

The scary and sad part is that I doubt YouTube will do anything about it despite reports and that there are so many people that either don't care or don't know/realise. Only saw like one or two other comments calling out that mix having been made with AI

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I have yet to hear an AI generated song that didn't have some obvious tells in the vocals. Like how you can hear autotune, but it's even worse than autotune. Crackly/crunchy, heavily distorted but only on certain words. Weird pronunciation or annunciation.

[–] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Hoimo@ani.social 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fuck, I failed the test. I have to wonder if they're full unsupervised generation though, because one of them had a recurring motif that I know an algo would have a hard time to keep track of. None of it was really my genre anyway, but it still got me good.

[–] wols@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

I passed, but I'm fairly confident I wouldn't have if it weren't explicitly a test. I listened to all of them twice, with the express purpose of identifying the ones that are AI-generated.
Even then, I wasn't as confident in my prediction as I would have liked.

I'll say, I did enjoy all of them musically, but when I paid closer attention to the lyrics, I noticed something really odd and hard to describe in the ones generated by AI. Like some new kind of cringe. Like it would be embarrassing for a human to have written those lines, but not in a relatable kind of way. Not in the usual "I'm embarrassed for you" kind of way.
I was torn between "I hope this isn't AI, I'm vibing with the music" and "I hope no human wrote these lyrics".

The whole exercise also shattered my perception of my own taste in music - I liked all of the AI-generated ones and I'm not happy about it.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 days ago

You have yet to notice an AI-generated song that didn't have some obvious tells.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 3 points 3 days ago

I know somebody who likes using these GenAI tools for images and music now. It's too easy to recognize the style after a while, and it annoys me every time

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Because it's better than the shitty music record labels are spewing these days. It's pretty bad when computer generated music is better than some plastic pop tune "composed" by 12 "producers" who pieced together samples from 30 pieces of classic music recorded by legendary musicians, then stuck some pretty manikin in front to provide a voice to be digitally manipulated until it can be crammed into the mix.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (12 children)

The drummer sounds like he has to many arms.
And the guitarist and the keyboard players sound like they clearly have more than 5 fingers on each hand. 😋

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 40 points 5 days ago

every progressive genre wants to speak with you.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Maybe people with be more protective of their art from here on out and stop trying to make a mill off of clout.

We gave the tech companies or data. We are reaping the consequences.

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Okay okay. First off, fuck AI yeah. But if it's becoming this indistinguishable where you need to go looking for tells that it's AI I don't think it's fair to call it bad music, just how it got there is bad.

It's like listening to Kanye West. Graduation is amazing but fuck him.

[–] nelly_man@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Humans have made a lot of shitty, uninspired music as well. So it could mean that AI-generated slop is indistinguishable from human-made slop, in which case, it would still be bad music.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] thingAmaBob@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I will admit, I can maybe tell if a video is AI and can listen when something is AI (the way it speaks and the formulaic feel are dead giveaways for me), but often cannot tell if written word is AI. I am not looking forward to its technological improvements… 🫠

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I once read an article that answered my question as "yes" in the first paragraph, then as a "no" in the following paragraph. And I was mad for having fallen for AI-made bullshit.

[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Last time I heard ai generated music an immediate tell for me was the vocals, for some reason they just sound a little bit off. Not off key, but similar to a "robot" voice filter maybe? Of course, just like AI generated images that tell will probably be "solved" soon

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 5 days ago

This description of AI songs could be a lament about most pop music: formulaic, sweet, generic, produced in a studio to sound perfect, not human. Works on radio or Spotify, but not so much for a live audience.

Sure, that's hard to detect. AI reproduces what we've been exposed to for decades.

[–] remote_control_conor@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't listen to anything made after about 2010. I don't have these worries.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I only watch YouTube videos from pre 2010. You probably wouldn't know them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›