this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
88 points (89.3% liked)

no context

2123 readers
89 users here now

A place for posting anything out of context. Please caption any posts PIC

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

This movie was ruined for me when I realize luc Besson is a pedophile and his desire to fuck little girls is in all his movies. Leon being the most egregious. Go look at the BTS photos of Besson constantly hugging and touching Natalie Portman, creepy as hell.

Sixth sense as well, when you realize Leloo is essentially an infant in an adult body that everyone wants to catch and fuck.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago

Helping blind people do chores.

[–] grumman@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If I'm not mistaken this is from the movie "Léon", would highly recommend.

[–] mech@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Definitely a movie you couldn't make like this today.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You definitely could if you removed Luc Besson's pedo fetishism

[–] mech@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's exactly what I meant.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. A big undercurrent in the movie is Leon taking on Mathilda in a father/daughter relationship, but Mathilda has aged under her abusive family relationship to where she sees Leon as a knight in shining armor instead of a father figure.

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which is a plot point then used to excuse away the fact that they have an underage Natalie portman taking instructions from a pedo behind the camera. I'm hoping you're not, but I've seen people use that to say it was ok in the context of the movie. Like, gross.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It isn't an excuse. It is pointing out the text of the film.

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I get that, but it's unfortunately also an excuse for a lot of people

Edit: the story could've still been told, we could've still heard about her trauma and how it affected her, without resorting to pedo shit. That's the difference between a good director and a pedo who happens to be directing

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get that. Also, apparently Jean Reno acted against the direction given by the director to allow for a character that wouldn't take advantage of his situation, even if he intentionally played his character as an emotionally stunted man.

Reno's acting choices made the movie better because he didn't go down that pedo hole.

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Yup, without that it honestly wouldn't have been watchable. Get the pedo shit off the screen, but still have the trauma in the script, and you would've had a great movie

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Just avoid the non-American version. It is a movie written by a pedo, for pedos. Some comes through still but apparently it's not nearly as bad.

Seen it once, never watching again personally.

[–] phaedrus@piefed.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

Still has enough pedo vibes to make it hard to suggest this film to others. Sucks, because outside of that it's a good movie with great acting from Oldman. Kind of like how Irreversible is also an excellent movie, if it weren't for the 9-minute long uncut/realistic rape scene.

Must be a French thing?

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Helps that oldman even stepped in for a couple of the scenes to protect the young actor and be like "yeah no I'm not doing that and neither is she, write it out and do something else."

Look at the BTS photos, luc besson can’t keep his hands off Natalie Portman

the young actor

You can use her name. People have heard of Natalie Portman.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It might be Luc "cleared of all charges" Besson's thing

[–] phaedrus@piefed.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Gaspar Noe, the director for Irreversible, is also French. I just meant, "I guess the French really like to get saucy in their art."

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

do you think a young girl from a broken household like that wouldnt be...weird...with strong protective figure like leon showing up?

leon doesn't take advantage of her or anything, shoots down all her advances, the "relationship" is always protrayed as clearly unhealthy and something leon doesnt want

granted, i only watched the english version

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I thought the same thing after seeing the American version, it just seemed like a understandable case of a childhood crush that Leon reacts to with equally understandable awkwardness.

Then I watched the director's preferred version. It's pedo bait and he's a legally proven pedophile who "married" a child he met when she was 12 and who was pregnant and married by 16, end of story.

[–] murvel@feddit.nu 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah!? And what's your take one Taxi Driver?

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Never seen it, that another pedo pleaser?

[–] murvel@feddit.nu -3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Idk. You tell me since you seem to know so well what that is.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you didn’t notice the pedo undertones to not just Leon but most Luc Besson movies, you’re clueless or weird

[–] murvel@feddit.nu -1 points 6 hours ago
[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] murvel@feddit.nu 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao seems to me you're the one with pedophilia on your mind.

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Someone suggested a movie directed by a pedophile with pedophilic elements. I simply gave a warning for others that haven't seen it. Reddit and Lemmy seem to have a hard on for this movie (wonder why), so when I watched it I was surprised, uncomfortable, grossed out, and wondered HOW this could ever be recommended by anyone not a pedophile. The two different movies thing MIGHT be important for those of us that maybe want to watch the movie, but also aren't pedos.

Really not hard to put 2 and 2 together here for anyone literate. The REAL question is: why are YOU defending a pedo movie so much? Are you ACTUALLY a pedo, retarded, or, all of the above: a magat?

[–] hactar42@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

The American version is called "The Professional". Leon is the weird pedo version.

Yeah I was shocked at how different they were.

Just shows what good editing can do I suppose.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I like the scene at the end where she tells other children in class what she did over the summer, and the teacher called it bullshit...

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just a good samaritan teaching an orphan how to defend herself.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] snailboy@leminal.space 11 points 1 day ago

Apparently Gary Oldman wasn't supposed to yell that line, but for one take he decided to just whip around and blow up at that guy. Good call, Gary.

[–] Konstant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That looks like mid-sneeze

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Should be animated. Try opening the gif in a browser if it's not

[–] Konstant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Oh right. It's animated in desktop. But I was on a mobile app and it was just a still image.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

"Don't even think about eating my yogurt!"

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I love the clothing

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

We have daredevil at home?