this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
223 points (99.6% liked)

Games

43372 readers
1381 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's early stages and buggy, but it's on its way. All games, even bland, boring, or bad ones, deserve to remain playable.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 minutes ago

But I was told by pirate software that this was impossible and would devastated the gaming industry.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I thought it was very funny that I only even heard about concord existing when it was announced the service was shutting down. I feel like they didn't know advertising for it

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I like how the two comment replies you got were completely opposite of each other lol

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 7 hours ago

Yeah which makes me think that it was six of one and half a dozen of the other.

Terrible marketing and fairly mediocre gameplay.

Although obviously I don't know because like pretty much everyone else I never actually played it. And I like hero shooters and even played overwatch semi-professionally, so I would have been in the circles that would have heard about it, if Sony had bothered to tell anyone.

[–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Tbh the marketing and price tag are what killed it. The game itself was actually pretty fun, played a lot like Destiny 1 pvp and really didn't feel like a hero shooter at all (which is a good thing). The abilities complemented the gunplay, not the other way around, and movement was crisp.

Firewalk had a great core, but Sony fucked it up.

[–] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Nah, it was just a terrible game, hence the lack of advertisement. A hero shooter with zero soul put into it.

Edit: I actually played the game, would love to see the person who downvoted me defend fuckin Concord of all things 😂

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If Sony sees this, they'll misread it as interest, release it again, and it'll flop again. It's what's known as a Morbious.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

It's concordin' time!

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The correct lesson to take away from it, that they won't ever do, is to release multiplayer games in a way where they can live on without constant updates or a central server.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not sure that’s possible with multiplayer games, at least the central server part. They could release the central server code as an open source project… that would be very useful. But MMOs need that central communication to even work. I mean I guess you could engineer some sort of peer to peer but I’ve dealt with weird firewall rules in various DCs I’ve had servers located in or god forbid the lack of incoming connectivity in peoples homes. Outbound traffic is usually fairly unrestricted so a publicly available server is the way to go architecturally.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

In this case, the ask is to release the server binary and allow users to point their game to a different server when the official one is gone.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago

Hopefully Stop Killing Games can achieve that goal because big bosses don't see the benefits.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Make it a permanently free ps plus game as a bonus for ps plus

[–] kionay@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A... Mourbioros? Morboros? Mouroboros?

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

imo, Mourboboros (last one with an extra b, for fun)

Not me. I want to watch it flop again.

Ugh man, Concord gets fan servers but I can't play BF1943 anymore...cruel world.

[–] meisterah@ttrpg.network 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Useful idiots keep telling me people won't work for free.

They say that if we don't pay businesses the prices they demand, then nothing would get done.

Why are people so stupid?

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because they're correct, you're just being too literal in your understanding of the statement.

Will people occasionally work for free? Sure. For friends, family, friends of friends, hell even strangers sometimes, volunteering is a thing, sure.

Will they work for free reliably and consistently enough that they can be built upon by other people?

Obviously not, they sometimes don't even do it for money.

Society as it is today, with its insane population count and highly specialised workflows, requires an insane amount of logistics that absolutely can't bear "random cunt #354 decided not to work this month so the boat is without a captain" levels of random disruption without heavy consequences; this is incidentally also why strikes are extremely effective.

No society that evolved beyond subsistence did so without some obligation to work, whether through monetary incentives or straight up serfdom/slavery; and if subsistence is all you want, I'm sure you can go live in like, some tribal commune on a Pacific island somewhere.

[–] meisterah@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, bud, that's why communism worked every time.

[–] Legom7@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

If communism was destined to collapse on itself every time, why did the US spend billions on overthrowing all the communist South American countries?

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Useful Idiot. They're so convinced that they're on the winning side that facts don't matter anymore.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What makes you think people will work for free?

I need some work done at my house, will you come take care of it for me?

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wouldn't do an Internet stranger's house. But I absolutely would help a friend's or neighbors if they so asked.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also basically every chapter of Habitat for Humanity has a home repair program people can apply to

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure I wouldn't qualify.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because I don't know their situation, their life. I don't have enough trust that I'll just take someone at face value from a small subset. Don't want to get jumped. Don't want to get taken advantage of.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago

Impressive. This is like making a Star Trek replicator, but the only thing it can make is more garbage.