this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
805 points (99.3% liked)

politics

26368 readers
4346 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would bet good money that she banged a guy in his 30s when she was 15 and she is REALLY invested in maintaining the personal illusion that she wasn't victimized.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Calling child protection services, this ghoul has 3 kids.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

To stay on Team Republican, all you gotta do is be ok with old guys fucking your kids!

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If, at any point in your life, any part of your stance involves the language “technically not a pedophile,” for any fucking reason, you’re entirely on the wrong side of the situation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 7 points 2 days ago

Ah, so the human trafficking, sex monster that fucked children was not a full "pedophile".... yeah would not want to mislabel the child fucker as a pedophile....

What in the hormone filled milk is this medieval era statement trying to say?

[–] mgtzbos@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Okay, so if or when Megan’s daughter Yardly hits puberty (she’s 14), she’s fair game for men? That’s not pedophilia? That isn’t statutory rape? Really???? And with more and more girls having their first period as early as 9, that wouldn’t be pedophilia to pursue and have sex with them? What a piece of shit for a woman and mother.

[–] melonhusk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

yeah, i'm sure she also believes it's 'technically not a fall' if you land on your feet... eventually.

[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

What a disgusting piece of grifter shit

kelly argues that a subtype of pedophilia is not pedophilia

This is where we’re at now?

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

She must hang out on Reddit, cuz this sounds like a Reddit comment.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

She would sale her own children to be sex slaves if it meant she got some attention.

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

sure, but that doesn't mean it wasn't child sexual exploitation and abuse

[–] jared@mander.xyz 8 points 3 days ago
[–] marduk@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Pedo, hebe, ephebe, woodchipper for all

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›