this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
231 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26356 readers
3388 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For Sweet, the feelings of frustration are only compounded by a feeling that she was betrayed by the Democratic-aligned senators who broke with the party on the health care subsidies.

She said that she understands that many workers were desperate for a paycheck. But she thought standing firm on the issue of the health care subsidies was worth her sacrifice.

“There are other federal workers who understood what we were holding the line for and are extremely unhappy that line was crossed and that trust was breached,” she said.

The DNC needs to go.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Crumbling like wet tissue paper for nothing in exchange is absolutely not worth it.

The Democratic Party made their sacrifices worthless.

[–] Raglesnarf@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (2 children)

anyone else feeling political fatigue?

I'm tired of voting for people that don't seem to listen to us or fight for us

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That was precisely why Schumer did this, to put a rising populism in check by cynically sabotaging it while superficially pretending to be against the sabotage like the spineless weasel Schumer is.

Schumer was responding to the "threat" of the likes of Zohran Mamdani (who Schumer REFUSED to endorse which is pathetic) not the threat of Trump and fascism which Schumer does not perceive as a threat whatsoever especially because his donors don't either.

Think of this as a much worse, much bigger version of coming in and breaking a worker strike at the worst possible moment ON PURPOSE as somebody claiming they are "on the workers side" to specifically destroy the solidarity and moral among the workers striking so they will be more pliant in the future towards accepting worse conditions.

This will go down in history as one of the largest betrayals of working class power in the US in modern history. Not in terms of how evil it is, what Trump and cronies are doing is way more evil in terms of raw impact, but this... this took an overbearing desire to undercut those who are resisting the "wrong way" to fascism and there is something SUPREMELY evil about that and I will never, ever forget or forgive.

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/11/04/congress/schumer-ultimately-rejects-mamdani-endorsement-00636312

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago

You think it's ghosts and goblins. I think it was a bad trade for more Epstein files in the hopes they'll topple the emperor.

Do you have a strategy or just hopelessness?

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

If anything it catalyzes the need to pivot away from limp old Dems to those who will actually defend the Constitution and rule of law.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wasn't worth it at all. The ACA was the legislation that defined the entire Democrat platform this millennium. Even when it was watered down from what we had hoped (Fuck you, Joe Leiberman), it still was far better than nothing. Personally, the ACA keeps me alive. It massively expanded access to health insurance, especially for the poorest who now could get healthcare without as much worry about it impacting their finances. Letting these subsidies die is essentially letting the ACA die, it's just one more step to repealing it entirely to be replaced with nothing at all, because we know the reason the Republicans won't show us what their healthcare plans are because they don't exist or are so fucking evil that they don't want to share them until they've already rammed them through.

The DNC has fucking ruined the party by focusing far more on their own personal power within the system rather than helping people. Pro-tip, kneeling in kente cloths was never going to stop black Americans from being mindlessly murdered by a largely white supremacist police force. Doing nothing about the police, and in fact giving them more funding is part and parcel to why we see so many police departments not just not protecting their citizens from ICE, but actively helping ICE terrorize their communities. Thanks, Biden, handing those cops a shitload more money really worked out, huh?

[–] AlreadyDefederated@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please us "Democratic" when using it as an adjective. "Democrat" is the noun.

When you use "Democrat" as an adjective, that's the Republican framing - intentionally bad grammar because supposedly it sounds better to emphasize the "rat" or something. Because their brain never advanced beyond 6th grade.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Please let's stop letting the Republicans frame every piece of language and every conversation with how they define things. You're letting them dictate reality when you do that and change your language to placate them. By bending to their definitions you're essentially proving to others that their definitions are somehow correct, and allowing them to continue to frame the narrative. You're giving them power over the conversation. Please can we stop doing that and letting their abuse of language control how we speak? It's deeply clear from the context of the rest of my comment that it is not a Republican framing. They don't believe in words or use them responsibly so trying to route around their chicanery doesn't actually do anything except let them frame the argument.

Further, it's a fucking comment on the internet. I'm not a journalist, I am allowed to have bad grammar. Fucking grammar police over here. If that's really all you have to contribute to the conversation: how about you just don't instead?

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Schumer made sure it wasn't.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wasn’t. Their suffering & struggle meant nothing. Thanks democrats for folding under pressure.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

It wasn't "nothing"

In addition to getting everything the republicans wanted 40 days ago and nothing the democrats wanted 40 days ago, they also got a federal ban on hemp-derived THC, and gave republican congressmen the ability to sue the federal government for millions of dollars for being investigated for trying to overthrow the government on January 6th. You would be paying your employer a paycheck if you let the democrats negotiate a raise on your behalf.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 36 points 1 day ago
[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What we have here is a football asking whether it's sacrifice was "worth it" at the end of a game.

Unfortunately for them, I've never seen a sport talk about the contributions or sacrifices the ball made.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Bingo. Not the first time the football had to take one for the team.

Schumer’s getting pretty old. Might be time to call a vet.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It was not.