I get that! I'm just trying to gently encourage you to start thinking a little more about how your beliefs work rather than what they're classified as. Ask yourself questions like:

• How does this "party-union-state" work?
• Who represents who? Do the unions represent all unionized workers and the parties represent all non-unionized workers? If this is the case, why not have all workers be unionized? If not, who makes up the parties?
• How are the state and government separate from each other? How are decisions made (by majority, plurality, consensus, etc) and carried out? If the state is separate from the unions and the parties, then who makes up the state? How is that decided?
• How do we get to this system from the one we have now? Do we participate in elections and change it from the inside? Do we get enough of the population unionized and threaten a general strike? Have people tried to create this system in the past? If yes, how has it worked out for them? In what ways did they succeed, and in what ways did they fail? What lessons can we learn from those successes and failures?

I'm not asking these questions because I want you to answer them all right now (though if you want to answer them feel welcome!) but rather to get you thinking about them. In case it isn't clear, I mean this in good faith! It makes me happy to see someone identifying problems with the current system and creatively trying to sort out ways to change it. I just think the effort spent in trying to label those beliefs is better spent on trying to make them a reality.

So you had already come to a conclusion, and just wanted people to guess what you'd already concluded?

my apologies. i was only kidding. my response wasn't even a reaction to anything you described. just bad taste.