So, Reagan had Reagonomics and Trump has what... Rapeonomics?
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
484 points (99.6% liked)
politics
26327 readers
2711 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Pedonomics
Pedorapenomics?
Goddamn, republicans out there demonstrating over and over that they just LOVE pedophiles. dafuq is up with that?
Because they are pedophiles. Look at all of the arrests of Republican child molesters across the US before Trump's election. All of the anti-trans and anti-drag rhetoric has always been projection.
I would probably just consider an old mate a Facebook friend now, not a personal friend anymore, because keeps posting far right stuff online even though he is a brown immigrant. And at the very least, I hope he isn't a pedophile.
Conservatism is a bad world view. Rigid patriarchal authority will lead to abuse.
They . . . love pedophiles.
They’re pedophile-philes.
Building up to Ghislaine Maxwell
Truth
Andrew Taake pleaded guilty in September to soliciting what he believed was a 15-year-old girl for sex, but The Daily Beast reported the 37-year-old was able to stay out of prison for the sex offense due to the "credit" he was given for time served behind bars for attacking a police office during the U.S. Capitol riot.
"Legal experts branded the decision 'exceptionally rare,'" the website reported. "Multiple attorneys told the Daily Beast that using 'credit' from a pardoned federal case for separate crimes to keep Taake out of prison on unrelated state charges was also 'ethically problematic.'
'Ethically problematic?' Is that how you spell 'perversion of justice?'
"Perversion of justice for perverts" could be a maga slogan.
So just to make it clear though, dual sovereignty laws mean the Federal government could have and still could bring charges for being a sexual predator against him, and has not done so right? What a strange time we live in
Gamification of Crime. Oof
He should figure out how much more prison credit he has and then commit crimes to match the balance.