this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
105 points (99.1% liked)

Boycott US

1685 readers
128 users here now

Overview:

The community dedicated to boycotting the US until they stop fascism, restore full democracy and start following international law.

Americans have a moral obligation to resist Donald Trump and project 2025 at every turn.

America is a flawed democracy currently being ruled by oligarchs. Stop the backslide! Dont let America become the next Hungary.

America needs to challenge the court rulings of citizens united v. fec and shelby county v. holder, protect the media, implement independent district drawing, and the single transferable vote so they don't end up having people stay home in life-changing elections because they cannot vote for their favourite candidate.

Join 50501.chat to fight back!


Related communities:

Boycott:!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyeuropean@feddit.uk

!boycott@lemmy.sdf.org

!boycottchina@sopuli.xyz

Activism:!antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world

!petitions@lemmy.ca

!palestine@lemmy.dbzer0.com

!protest@lemmy.world

!israelicrimes@lemmy.world

!patriotsforprogress@lemmy.ca

!goodsuniteus@lemmy.ca


founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Give me a $20K electric Ford Ranger please

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

90s style with a full bed and a single cab with no infotainment bullshit while we're at it.

[–] tankfox@midwest.social 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you're going to talk about the Slate just mention it by name https://www.slate.auto/en

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 3 days ago

Well that's certainly the closest thing I've seen to what I'm looking for.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Slate truck looks promising but unfortunately for me it's in the USA and who knows when they'll actually hit the road.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, it looks cool so I won't hold my breath. I don't expect cool things to actually happen anymore.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

$20K??? how can you expect execs to buy their second yachts with that kind of pocket change?!

[–] LoveCanada@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Its a cool truck IF you dont need to tow anything.

But a LOT of contractors tow trailers. Building supply trailers, tool trailers, heavy equipment trailers, air compressor trailers and then on the weekend pulling holiday trailers, boat trailers and sometimes car trailers or moving trailers - there's a lot of things that get pulled by pickups - and they royally suck for range once you're pulling. Range drops very dramatically.

Its one thing to pull into a gas station and refuel but MOST charging stations aren't even set up as pull throughs, so a trailer is a major pain in the butt. The entire point of a new 'tool' like the Lightning is to make your life easier and more convenient, not less.

I will say though, that the new Silverado EV has surprisingly long range for an EV. Reportedly up to 800 km with no load and even at half range, 400 km while towing is still usable, not outstanding, but usable.

[–] Slevin06@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] LoveCanada@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

There are multiple *reputable *car and truck magazines that say range of the F150 Lightning drops in half while towing. https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/ford-f150-lightning-electric-truck-towing-test

MotorTrend real world range with no trailer: 255 miles.

Range with light, medium and heavy trailer: 115, 100 and 90 miles.

BIG range killer. Heavy trailer kills range to almost 1/3 of unloaded range.

The Lightning is particularly bad for towing.

[–] Slevin06@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I deleted my previous reply as I did not properly read the article you linked. Motortrend briefly touch on the point that the Aging Wheels video goes into much more depth on. That it is aerodynamic efficiency, not weight that has the significant impact on range. This is an important distinction. Tools, construction materials, etc. weigh what they weigh, altering that variable to a significant degree is not really a feasable proposal and does rule out electric vehicles in general for viable long distance towing if this was the major impacting factor. Improving aerodynamic efficiency of heavy towed loads as a major impacting factor however is a much more viable strategy.

I think a more accurate criticism is that electric vehicles are a poor choice for towing aerodynamicly inefficient loads long distance, as whilst the efficiency loss impacts all vehicle types, the energy carrying capacity and recharge times of many current electric vehicles make them a worse choice.

[–] LoveCanada@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That seems like a lot of words to say EV trucks suck at towing especially the Lightning.

The very nature of almost all trailers is that they dont have great aerodynamics, especially holiday trailers, a primary reason why people buy a pickup truck.

[–] Slevin06@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That doesn't mean that it is financially unviable to improve tailers, to the benefit of both gas and electric vehicles. With the advent of Airshaper, CFD is commercially viable for trailer companies R&D if there is demand.

[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

About 2/3 of truck owners rarely or never tow.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 45 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Shocker. An even heavier and more expensive version of their already massive and expensive road tank isn't selling.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The only reason I wouldn't want a tank is the fuel costs. I'd be making grocery runs in a Sherman EV, living my best life.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

without the turret and chassis.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Speak for yourself

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

At least you'd have style. Might damage roads

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 42 points 4 days ago

Tradespeople need an ev, but a $100,000 emotional support wagon probably isn't it.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

$70k+ is insane for that truck.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

conservatives arnt exactly the brightest bunch when it comes to purchasing. on the hindsight, this is why byd was made 100% so us companies can charge overpriced cars.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’d love one, except I live in an apartment, it wouldn’t fit in my garage, it makes no sense to own one in the city, and I’m lucky to pay rent these days much less pay it again for a truck I have nowhere to put and nowhere to use.

All this is why I got a used Fiesta instead.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

An EV Fiesta (or Escort or Focus) would fill the needs of a vastly undeserved segment of the population.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Even moreso if it was cheap. Not 30k, try 10, 15. Everyone should be able to afford one.

[–] WALLACE@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

Best they can do is that shitty Puma

[–] Cnkcv@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 days ago

I'm kind of surprised. Every contractor I know who has them, loves them, saves them a ton of money.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 4 days ago

Well that's not surprising given the fact that the vehicle is completely unusable outside of North America.