this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
935 points (99.7% liked)

News

33143 readers
2949 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 387 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Lairmore had testified that the sandwich “exploded all over” his chest and claimed he could smell mustard and onions. But a photo showed that the sandwich was still in its wrapper on the ground after it hit Lairmore in his bulletproof vest.

So he perjured himself, then? Surely something's going to come of that? No? Huh, okay, then.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 339 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If the sandwich did not split, you must acquit!

[–] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

comment of the century.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago

You missed your calling in life. This comment would have blown up the legal world if said in court.

Im sad it wasn't done.

[–] mikenurre@lemmy.world 110 points 1 week ago (10 children)

He also claimed he felt it through his Kevlar vest. Didn't know sandwiches are more powerful than bullets.

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 142 points 1 week ago (3 children)

To be fair he was a little bitch, and little bitches feel everything.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

ironic since they’re heartless

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago

Is

Is a little bitch

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 68 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is a big difference between being able to feel something and being injured by it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 45 points 1 week ago

It hit him right in the fee fees, and badly damaged his already fwagile mascuwinity.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You need special plating to handle those sub-sonic sandwiches.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So I was on a jury. The officer involved testified on some things that made it sound very bad for the defendant.

Then we saw the body cam of part the interaction. Technically what he said was true but extremely exaggerated. Made us discount everything he said that wasn't on video.

We ended thinking the defendant was probably guilty but they didn't prove it so we decided not guilty.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats how the jury i was on went but it was before body cams. Basically they said dude was "exchanging small packages for money" implying he was dealing drugs. The cops claimed he tossed the "small packages" when he drove off. They never collected these "small packages" so how do i know what they were?

We all thought dude was probably guilty but that the police work was too shoddy to convict. Cop looked pissed on the way out of court.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Cops do it constantly. TBH I'd chalk that level of bullshit up to them constantly using ChatGPT to write their reports now, except that they've been pulling the same bullshit forever and getting away with it nearly every single time.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I firmly believe that police officer testimony that can't be backed up by bodycam footage shouldn't even be admissible. There's essentially no reason for a cop to not have their bodycam turned on at all times unless they specifically chose to turn it off, so there's no reason we should have to accept testimony without it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] manxu@piefed.social 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wasn't there a case of police officers badly beating someone and then claiming his blood stains on their uniforms were destruction of police property or some such?

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I'm not aware of that specific case, but yeah that tracks. I've read about incidents where the cops were enraged about things like victims of traffic accidents or assaults by officers being soaked in blood, getting it on them, and stating that they 'didn't want to risk getting hepatitis/AIDS' as justification for declining to provide lifesaving medical intervention. In some cases, the delay in care led to deaths, while they stood by, and weren't censured by their departments.

They've been using seizures from acute health incidents and tazers both as justification for escalation of force because "suspects were resisting" for quite a while.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago

it is actually worth pursuing that…
even just posting comments about that on every news video about it on youtube would help.
we have a rare combination of undeniable, clear video evidence vs. sworn testimony in court that is unambiguously a lie.
There’s no real wiggle room on that.
Why not call prosecutors and annoy them? Or send letters to the judge?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 138 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The fact that this guy had to go to court at all to defend himself is just asinine. These dumb fascist fucks are a bunch of thin skinned bullies.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not really sure its because they are thin skinned. Its part of the facist playbook. You have to make an example of anyone that steps out of line.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's also a pretty clear example of SLAPP prosecution.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago

This was a HUGE waste of OUR hard earned tax dollars. This should NEVER have gone to trial. I'm embarrassed to call myself an American.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago

This is clearly judicial harrassment ... this prosecutor is now likely to lose his job. If sandwich guy is smart he will sue about 4-5 different people/groups.

DC is practicing Jury Nullification ... wondering if the Juries there would steamroll these lawsuits forward.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 123 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Border Patrol Officer Greg Lairmore received two "gag gifts" related to the incident — a plush sandwich and a patch featuring a cartoon of Dunn throwing the sandwich with the words “Felony Footlong” — which the defense team argued showed this was not a serious event in his life.

That is amazing.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Did John Oliver send those?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 84 points 1 week ago (9 children)

It should be remembered that SEVERAL grand juries initially declined to charge the defendant, despite the ironic traditional reputation of grand juries to "indict a ham sandwich." But they kept going back. They were determined to destroy this citizen.

Obviously, they eventually prevailed, got the Sandwich Assassin into a courtroom, where the "victim" proceeded to blatantly lie in open court:

Lairmore had testified that the sandwich “exploded all over” his chest and claimed he could smell mustard and onions. But a photo showed that the sandwich was still in its wrapper on the ground after it hit Lairmore in his bulletproof vest.

What fucking drama queen LIAR. He should be charged with perjury.

Also, the jurors had sandwiches for lunch. I'm surprised the Trump lawyers didn't try for a mistrial on the grounds that lunch was prejudicial.

I feel bad for the guy for losing a perfectly good sandwich.

Fucking ICE losers.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Continuing the great American tradition of jury nullification

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

here's hoping Luigi and Tyler get off too for the same reason.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s actually pretty insane that this has happened, what, twice now in only a few weeks, both cases related to the fed occupations. I can’t even remember the last time an acquittal like this happened before that, though I don’t follow this stuff closely. I think OJ is the last one I’m aware of but that’s obviously a totally different situation. I was definitely expecting s different outcome, but good for him. I remember in the video they called him “Superman”, lol. I guess so!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The jury — which feasted on sandwiches for lunch Thursday, according to a person familiar with jury lunches — deliberated the charges for several hours Wednesday and Thursday before delivering the verdict.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Sooooo new trend? Subs for fascists?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

He should now sue to have ICE buy him a gift card to replace the sandwich.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

🎶There goes my hero... Watch him as he throws! 🎵

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Every day goes by seeing this in the news and I am reminded of child criminal Brendon Chaney.

WARNING: This kid is a criminal

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] manxu@piefed.social 24 points 1 week ago

Soooo... We PAID for this B.S. We paid for the arrest, check the number of uniformed tax-payer funded officers. We paid for the prosecution, we paid for the court, we paid for the jury, we paid and paid AFTER the famously sandwich-indicting Grand Jury wouldn't touch this case.

Somehow it feels like the DA should be relieved of their duties.

[–] IronpigsWizard@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A jury of the defendant's peers just said "FUCK YOU!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

🎵🎶There goes my gyro

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Imagine being the cop on the stand talking about the smell of onions and a light stain on his shirt acting like he just came back from 'Nam. Fucking embarrassing.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

If the sandwhich don’t fit you must acquit!

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

He threw it in protest. He was acquitted.

You know what to do next time you go to protest!

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ahahaha, what a hero

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I picture the jury savoring their lunch sandwich and one of them being like, "So... not guilty?". Everyone nods and goes back to working on their sandwich.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›