this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
669 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

29100 readers
1091 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 147 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] CHKMRK@programming.dev 11 points 2 months ago

Germany for example. There was just the Modern Solutions case and the ruling was that using a hex editor to get hardcoded MySQL passwords from a binary is considered hacking

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 97 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Security through obscurity is not security. I see no reason why source maps should be unavailable.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 75 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because source maps show how shitty your organization's code and overall engineering practices are.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ding ding ding

Open source code is usually quite nice and well done because money pressure is way less of an issue and everyone knows people will be looking at your code

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 22 points 2 months ago

If you look at the casual code that I have shamelessly made public on my GitLab, that might change your mind on that.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's probably also why development is usually really slow and most maintainers can't keep up/give up.

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nope, it is simply because they are overwhelmed. Either it's too much work to do after your day job or just too much work for one person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mack@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

depends.

if we're talking about a personal website nobody will care. if you are a multibillion company and there's the risk that literally anyone can create a 1:1 clone of your services... yeah that's a bit of a trouble

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Omitting source maps doesn't prevent that.

[–] mack@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

no it doesn't, and I am very aware that if anything runs on someone's computer then it can get replicated. but it gets slightly harder, also to reverse-engineer it or find potential fallacies. as well as source maps on prod are just a waste of bandwidth

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chazwhiz@lemmy.world 96 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Isn’t that just effectively un-minified? It’s just the client side code in the first place?

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 86 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Comments and full-length names make the source way more accessible.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah but even then they should be writing secure code anyways so it doesn't matter if someone reads it. It's just ui code. It's always readable

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago

Huh, I hate doing front end but I feel like in this team I'd manage. Shit even has comments.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

This is why you self host a private Gitea instance and have it auto mirror all of your github repos.

I forked it, and my instance automatically grabbed me a forever copy.

[–] CodingCarpenter@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Once the code is minified it's basically unreadable by humans it's useless this is far more readily available to anybody who may be curious about the work being done

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

Learning resource yeah.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 89 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Copyrighted content

archived them

on GitHub

Idk man 🧐
Run the countdown to when it's taken down

[–] refalo@programming.dev 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There's lots of content sitting just below the surface on github. Any time you make a PR on a repo, even if it gets closed or "deleted" by the repo owner, the actual link to the file itself stays there forever if you save it. Github's own dmca repo even has warez links on it, sitting there for years.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh that's cool, I had no idea! Though does that apply to content removed for DMCAs?

[–] refalo@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Usually entire repos are disabled in that case. I've never tried to access hidden content on a DMCA-removed repo, but I assume it would not work.

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yep, it’s got a DMCA takedown now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nihilomaster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You could argue that since it's publicly available and this repo only archives it that... I don't know man Copyright law is confusing.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I think you can get some kind of exemption for archival purposes. I know that the Internet Archive has one. But I also know that ultimately Microsoft is responsible for the data hosted on Github, and Microsoft's interest is to not even risk getting sued.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 65 points 2 months ago (3 children)

SVELTE 🥹 (im very happy to see svelte)

Also I'm scared that this person may be risking their github account by posting this, I dunno if it's legal to "distribute" apples website code yourself. If not, best hope they dont ban your whole account.

[–] mudkip 18 points 2 months ago

we love svelte

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 months ago

I mean... They kinda distributed it themselves /s

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago

Or even sue them

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago

And now the source code is part of copilot

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 46 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You’re supposed to disable source maps in prod?

Asking for a friend

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 months ago

if you think your source code is that precious and unique and special, go ahead and worry about it haha

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Just to save on wasted bandwidth for the client (and your server) is why I would disable them.

[–] brian@programming.dev 41 points 2 months ago

they're different files generally, the only client that will automatically request them is a debugger.

you turn them off because you don't want to expose your full source code. if you would be ok making your webpage git repo public then making sourcemaps available is fine.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 6 points 2 months ago

I work for a large software corp and we generally keep them in prod because it makes debugging prod issues much easier. The browser only downloads them when the dev tools are open.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yo gimme a repo link, you can’t blueball us like that

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is this interesting for some reason?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 50 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It’s how the web worked before minifiers, so kinda but not really.

You just have comments and original variable/function names.

I’m sure someone will argue this helps scrapers or hackers, but really it’s not that big of a deal.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It help users that make websites styles!

Eg. I have a discord style for fixing their bullshit

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mmmac@lemmy.zip 28 points 2 months ago

Our international teams kept enabling sourcemaps and I just had devops lock the directory to vpn access only 🤷

I know sourcemaps aren't the end of the world as it's all client side code that lives on the clients computer but it just feels dirty

[–] silt_haddock@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m gonna download this to my iPhone, just in case.

Try and stop me, Tim Apple!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oopsallnaps@piefed.ca 12 points 2 months ago

iirc Apple music's web ui also has sourcemaps, but I'm not subbed to apple music anymore to check. Its neat, but not really a huge blunder, nor takedown worthy.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

// these are unicode characters in four hex…

If your dev team needs a comment explaining this I have some serious concerns about their qualifications.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Incompetent-source!

load more comments
view more: next ›