this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
736 points (96.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

38108 readers
711 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[I literally had this thought in the shower this morning so please don't gatekeep me lol.]

If AI was something everyone wanted or needed, it wouldn't be constantly shoved your face by every product. People would just use it.

Imagine if printers were new and every piece of software was like "Hey, I can put this on paper for you" every time you typed a word. That would be insane. Printing is a need, and when you need to print, you just print.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 129 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I think that it's an astute observation. AI wouldn't need to be hyped by those running AI companies if the value was self-evident. Personally I've yet to see any use beyond an advanced version of Clippy.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I use it to romanize Farsi song texts. I cannot read their script and chatGPT can. The downside is that you have to do it a few lines at a time or else it starts hallucinating like halfway through. There is no other tool that reliably does this, the one I used before from University of Tehran seems to have stopped working.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did the same yesterday with some Russian songs and was told by my Russian date that it was an excellent result.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sigezayaq@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago

I use it to learn a niche language. There’s not a lot of learning materials online for that language, but somehow ChatGPT knows it well enough to be able to explain grammar rules to me and check my writing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (14 children)

My top reasons I have no interest in ai:

  • if it was great, it wouldn’t be pushed on us (like 3D TVs were)
  • there is no accountability, so how can it be trusted without human verification which then means ai wasn’t needed
  • environmental impact
  • privacy/security degradation
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If AI truly was the next frontier, we wouldn’t be staring at the start of another depression (or a bad recession). There would be a revolution of innovations and most people’s lives would improve.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The idea that technological improvements would improve everyone's life is based on the premise that capitalists wouldn't keep the productivity gains for themselves.

AI does offer some efficiency improvements. But the workers won't get that money.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Note that it was improving the average worker's life proportionately until the capitalists broke the system in the early 70s.

I'm guessing that the consistent trend wasn't consistent prior to WWII, that it was just a blip from about 1945 - 1970/.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grranibal@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pls give me just one more pixel

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Long ago, I'd make a Google search for something, and be able to see the answer in the previews of my search results, so I'd never have to actually click on the links.

Then, websites adapted by burying answers further down the page so you couldn't see them in the previews and you'd have to give them traffic.

Now, AI just fucking summarizes every result into an answer that has a ~70% of being correct and no one gets traffic anymore and the results are less reliable than ever.

Make it stop!

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Best I can offer is https://github.com/searxng/searxng

I run it at home and have configured it as the default search engine in all my browsers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

its also using biased sources, like blogs, and such into the slop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AI has become a self-enfeeblement tool.

I am aware that most people are not analytically minded, and I know most people don't lust for knowledge. I also know that people generally don't want their wrong ideas corrected by a person, because it provokes negative feelings of self worth, but they're happy being told self-satisfying lies by AI.

To me it is the ultimate gamble with one's own thought autonomy, and an abandonment of truth in favor of false comfort.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Had the exact same thought. If it was revolutionary and innovative we would be praising it and actual tech people would love it.

Guess who actually loves it? Authoritarians and corporations. Yay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AI got tons of money from investors they will eventually want ROI… this why they are trying to force it down our throats

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago

LLMs are a really cool toy, I would lose my shit over them if they weren't a catalyst for the whole of western society having an oopsie economic crash moment.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is some amazing insight. 100% correct. This is an investment scam, likely an investment bubble that will pop if too many realize the truth.

AI at this stage is basically just an overrefined search engine, but companies are selling it like its JARVIS from Iron Man.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As someone (forgot which blog I read it on, sorry) recently observed: if AI made software development so much easier, we'd be drowning in great new apps by now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It's advertising. It's shoved in your face so you use Copilot instead of Google.

I setup a brother all in one printer for my mother in law and it wanted to install software that loads at startup that pops up constantly with their printer toner sales and marketing.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] python@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I've been wondering about a similar thing recently - if AI is this big, life-changing thing, why were there so little rumblings among tech-savy people before it became "mainstream"? Sure, Machine Learning was somewhat talked about, but very little of it seemed to relate to LLM-style Machine learning. With basically all other innovations technology, the nerds tended to have it years before everyone else, so why was it so different with AI?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

Because AI is a solution to a problem individuals don't have. The last 20 years we have collected and compiled an absurd amount of data on everyone. So much that the biggest problem is how to make that data useful by analyzing and searching it. AI is the tool that completes the other half of data collection, analyzing. It was never meant for normal people and its not being funded by average people either.

Sam altman is also a fucking idiot yes-man who could talk himself into literally any position. If this was meant to help society the AI products wouldnt be assisting people with killing themselves so that they can collect data on suicide.

[–] fezcamel@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

And additionally, I’ve never seen an actual tech-savy nerd that supports its implementation, especially in this draconian ways.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I was reading a book the other day, a science fiction book from 2002 (Kiln People), and the main character is a detective. At one point, he asks his house AI to call the law enforcement lieutenant at 2 am. His AI warns him that he will likely be sleeping and won't enjoy being woken. The mc insists, and the AI says ok, but I will have to negotiate with his house AI about the urgency of the matter.

Imagine that. Someone calls you at 2 am, and instead of you being woken by the ringing or not answering because the phone was on mute, the AI actually does something useful and tries to determine if the matter is important enough to wake you.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Most things are nothing more than smoke and mirrors to get your money. Tech especially. Welcome to end stage capitalism.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The 0.001% have stolen $76,000,000,000,000 from US workers alone in the last 40 years.

AI is just a way for them to burn money rather than allow the doors to have a raise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Some of the older lemmings here will remember what it was like when every company wanted to make a website, but they didn’t really have anything to put in there. People were curious to look at websites, because you hadn’t seen that many yet, so visiting them was kinda fun and interesting at first. After about a year, the novelty had worn off completely, and seeing YetAnotherCompanyName.com on TV or a road side billboard was beginning to get boring.

Did it ever get as infuriating the current AI hype though? I recall my grandma complaining about TV news. “They always tell me to read more online.” she says. I guess it can get just as annoying if you manage to successfully ignore the web for a few decades.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think back then, they had a product that was ahead of its time, and just needed time for us to adapt to.*

Now, they have a solution in search of a problem, and they don't know what the good use cases are, so they're just slapping it on like randomly and aggressively.

  • I hate the way we did though, and hope AI destroys the current corporate internet.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

I was an adult during that time, and I don't recall it being anywhere near as annoying. Well, except the TV and radio adverts spelling at you like "...or visit our website at double-you double-you double-you dot Company dot com. Again, that's double-you double-you double-you dot C-O-M-P-A-N-Y dot com."

YMMV, but it didn't get annoying until apps entered the picture and the only way to deal with certain companies was through their app. That, of if they did offer comparable capabilities on their website but kept a persistent banner pushing you toward their app.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (13 children)

A couple years ago I read a news article written by a woman who had just left her silicon valley career because she was one of the people forerunning the implementation of AI and it terrified her and she saw how bad it was and the long-lasting implications on society and she bailed out due to conscientious objections.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Carol2852@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Most obviously OpenAI is still burning money like crazy and they also start offering porn AI as everyone else. 🤷‍♂️ Sometimes the current AI is useful, but as long as the hallucinations and plain wrong answers are still a thing I don’t see it eliminating all jobs.

It’s unfortunate that they destroy the text and video part of the internet on the way. Text was mostly broken before, but now images and videos are also untrustworthy and will be used for spam and misinformation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Like my parent's Amazon Echo with "Ask me what famous person was born this day."

Like, if you know that, just put it up on the screen. But the assistant doesn't work for you. Amazon just wants your voice to train their software.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Those trying to sell it are trying to figure out where it's most useful. In one way, I think it's an amazing technology, and I also wonder how it can be best used. However, I can't stand it being pushed on me, and I wish I could easily say no. Acrobat Reader is particularly unbearable with it. Trying to describe a drawing?? Ughhh. Waste of space and energy like nothing else.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

TL;DR

4 layers of stupidification. The (possibly willfully) ignorant user, the source bias, the bias/agenda of the media owner, then shitty AI.

AI should be a backup to human skill and not a replacement for it. It isn’t good enough, and who knows when or if it will ever be at a reasonable cost. The problem with the current state of AI is that it’s being sold as a replacement for many human jobs and knowledge. 30-40 years ago we had to contend with basic human bias and nationalism filtering facts and news before it got to the end user, then we got the mega-media companies owned by the ultra wealthy who consolidated everything and injected yet more bias with the internet and social media but at least you got provided with multiple sources, now we have AI being pushed as a source that can be programmed to use biased sources and/or objectively wrong sources that people don’t even bother checking another source about. AI should be used to find unique solutions to medical research, materials design, etc. Not whether or not microwaving your phone is a good idea.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, the internet was fucking everywhere once the dotcom bubble kicked off. Everyone had a website, and even my mum was like "Don't bother your dad, he's on the internet" like it was this massive thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)

When someone comes up with something like this, I transport the phrase back to the 80s where people said the exact same thing about home computers. "if a computer was something everyone wanted or needed, it wouldn't be constantly shoved (in) your face by every product. People would just use it." Ok great but a computer turned out to be something everyone wanted or needed which is why computers were built into everything by the turn of the 90s, famously leading to the Y2k bug.

Then I transport the phrase back to the mid 90s where people said the exact same thing about the internet. By the end of the 90s, the internet provided the backbone communications structures for telecommunications, emergency management, banking, education, and was built into every possible product. Ten years later people got smartphones and literally couldn't put them down.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Dealers give drugs for free until you're hooked...

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In my nearly half century on this planet and having dealt with many a drug dealer in my younger days, absolutely none of them have been this pushy 😆

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›