77

“He was trying to tell them that he was a doctor and probably trying to tell him who he was, to be honest. And they were screaming that they did not effing care who he was,” she said. “And the next thing I knew, they had him on the ground, grabbed him by the shirt, threw him on the ground, face first into the concrete and had him in cuffs.”

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Spacebar@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago

Ronny Jackson was Trump's White House doctor who proclaimed “He has incredibly good genes, and it’s just the way God made him,”

He then ran for office.

So no, don't expect Rep. Jackson (R) to call for any type of change based on his brush with police brutality.

[-] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 11 months ago

I haven't looked into him or his policies, but going by the "Republican" qualifier, if he was ever against police reforms I sure hope he's rethinking that right about now.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 30 points 11 months ago

I'm not sure that Republicans are capable of self-reflection or empathy.

[-] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 11 months ago

No, but they sometimes change their stance when it personally affects them.

But he will most likely continue to be a walking hypocrite.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

He's probably just pissed off that they treated him like a black guy.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

Same thoughts I was having.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

It's the only time they change their stance.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Money changes thier stance too.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Narrator: He isn't.

[-] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

The absolute hubris of those officers to show up to a scene without a damned clue as to what's going on and take over. If they haven't already, they're gonna get someone killed.

[-] 520@kbin.social 18 points 11 months ago

Spoiler alert: they have

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 6 points 11 months ago

there was a study about natural disasters that concluded letting people involved in the problem resolve it was best, outside authority bogged down decision making and their need to establish control over providing support was detrimental to the situation

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They say a liberal is a conservative who once got arrested. Will Congressman Jackson maybe realize that police sometimes overstep their bounds and need accountability? Or did he learn nothing?

Then again he’s Trump’s loyal follower, he probably is upset the cops treated him like a black guy.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I've heard it the other way: that a conservative is a liberal who once got mugged....I like yours better

[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

Surely the leopards won't eat my face!

[-] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Says the Representative working for the party of Leopards Who Eat Faces! 😁

[-] Hairyblue@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

The police need better training is dealing with people and deescalating problems. There is no reason to strong arm every one and be so aggressive.

[-] Jonna@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I don't disagree but states like Washington that have long mandated de-escalation training still have this same shit happening. The nature of policing in a capitalist state leads police to view the public as the enemy. Their job is to uphold the status quo, which is structural inequality. Individual cops are still individuals, of course. They just have to swim against the tide of how their job and the culture within departments shapes them.

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

The police need better purpose. Despite slogans, they don't exist to "protect and serve" the communities they patrol, and they never have. They exist to protect rich property owners from the masses. One of the best ways of doing that is by making the masses afraid of the ownership class's pitbulls.

[-] Rodsterlings_cig@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Doesn't help that the supreme court protects both their ignorance of the law and specifically stated multiple times they are not bound by any duty that even closely resembles "protect and serve".

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

It says something about civic engagement that none of the cops recognized him.

[-] Rodsterlings_cig@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

How anyone can justify police acting this way in general, but definitely for a medical emergency is beyond me.

[-] downpunxx@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Ronny Johnson is a drunk quack, they absolutely did the right thing by nuking that asshole

[-] Im14abeer@midwest.social 8 points 11 months ago

A drunk quack with a medical license, still more qualified to assist in a medical emergency than any cop.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Regardless of his addictions or opinions, he is a doctor and therefore much more suited to first aid than any of the cops that showed up just to beat someone up

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Crackhead Versus ACAB. Fight!

[-] jtmetcalfe@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 months ago

Me sowing: Me reaping:

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
77 points (94.3% liked)

politics

18134 readers
3739 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS